2011 – 2017 A Green Road Beach Sand/Soil Ocean Radiation Readings; California, Oregon, Washington (800 CPM High Reading) Things Are Going From Bad To Worse, Ocean Biologists, Government, Mass Media Missing In Action, In Complete Denial

This article is based on 100 percent science, which consists of observation, measurement, collecting evidence plus data. In another way, AGR is also muck raking, by exposing the corrupting influence of money/profit/absolute power inside the nuclear industry. Wouldn’t you agree that it is in the interest of the nuclear industry to downplay, deny and cover up INVISIBLE radiation releases, in order to maximize profits and minimize ‘bad press’?

If you are interested in diving in deeper into the murky world of invisible poisons that are notoriously hard to see and measure, as well as muck raking the nuclear industry, keep on going. Otherwise, better step out now. This article is only for those with open minds and common sense. If you will not accept any evidence or data other than that issued by the nuclear industry, stop reading now.

What happened at Fukushima? It all depends on who you ask… The following article took five years of research and consulting with a large number of nuclear experts.. Come to your own conclusion after diving in. It won’t take you five years to figure out what is going on, and it is not pretty.

At Fukushima Daichi, 3 Or More Coriums Melted Out Of Containment Into Ground, Compared To 1 At Chernobyl – China Syndrome, Ongoing Criticalities, Evidence And Data, Multiple 100 Ton Corium Lava Fires Underground

Why would civilians end up creating a nuclear radiation testing lab? Well, one reason might be that they are tired of the government and nuclear industry lying to them, and they want the truth. What better way is there than to get a direct connection to what is really happening, by measuring the radiation contamination yourself?

MARCH 10, 2017 A GREEN ROAD DAILY NEWS

IWAKI, Japan, March 9 (Thomson Reuters Foundation) – At a laboratory an hour’s drive from Japan’s Fukushima nuclear plant, a woman with a white mask over her mouth presses bright red strawberries into a pot, ready to be measured for radiation contamination.

Six years after a massive earthquake off the coast of Japan triggered meltdowns at three of Fukushima’s reactors, local mothers with no scientific background staff a laboratory that keeps track of radiation levels in food, water and soil.

As some women divide the samples between different bowls and handmade paper containers, others are logging onto computers to keep an eye on data – findings that will be published for the public to access.

The women on duty, wearing pastel-coloured overalls, are paid a small salary to come in for a few hours each day, leaving them free to care for their children after school.

“In universities, data is handled by qualified students, who have taken exams qualifying them to measure radiation. Here, it’s done by mothers working part-time. It’s a crazy situation,” laughed Kaori Suzuki, director of Tarachine, the non-profit organisation that houses the mothers’ radiation lab.

via FEATURE-After Fukushima disaster, Japanese mothers don lab coats to measure radiation | Reuters

TEPCO claims nothing melted out, and nothing other than hydrogen explosions happened. What if reality was much different from the claim? TEPCO also denied that there was any melt down for THREE MONTHS, after multiple reactors had melted out, and/or exploded…

Via Nick MARCH 11, 2017 “Without a steady coolant supply, a hot reactor core will continuously boil off the water surrounding it until the fuel is no longer immersed. If fuel rods remain uncovered, they may begin to melt, and hot, radioactive fuel can pool at the bottom of the vessel containing the reactor. In a worst-case meltdown scenario the puddle of hot fuel could melt through the steel containment vessel and through subsequent barriers meant to contain the nuclear material, exposing massive quantities of radioactivity to the outside world.”

The nuclear industry viewpoint is that Fukushima did not happen, nothing came out and no radiation showed up in America. Thus there is no possible way that anything bad can happen, especially since WHOI is testing ocean water and finding nothing.

If nothing happened, nothing came out, and no one was affected by Fukushima, why is the following story in Japan pretty common?

FUKUSHIMA LADEN WITH PILES OF RADIOACTIVE SOIL THAT CAN’T BE MOVED INTO STORAGE
MARCH 10, 2017 A GREEN ROAD DAILY NEWS

One of the reasons behind Sakai’s decision not to return is the radioactively contaminated soil that remains in the village. Walking around the village, one can see mounds with green covers over them, concealing flexible containers that hold contaminated soil. According to the Ministry of the Environment, the amount of tainted soil stored temporarily like this, as of the end of January, totals roughly 2.4 million cubic meters for the village of Iitate alone, or enough to fill the Tokyo Dome baseball stadium twice.

So far, however, only about 6,000 cubic meters of soil have been transported to interim storage facilities, while the amount due to be transported next fiscal year stands at about 22,000 cubic meters. At this pace, under a simple calculation, it would take over 100 years to transport all of the waste to interim storage facilities.

“There’s no way I’m going to live surrounded by mountains of contaminated soil,” Sakai says.
via Fukushima laden with piles of radioactive soil that can’t be moved into storage – Fukushima 311 Watchdogs

HOW BAD IS FUKUSHIMA?

How bad was it? How bad is the situation today?

Hmmm, what happens if you dump hundreds of TONS of heavy metal radioactive poisons into sea water? Most of these ‘minerals’ get absorbed by the sea plankton and ocean algae, which feed on the deposited minerals and metals being dumped into the ocean. Within 48 hours, ocean water is cleared of most heavy metal radioactive poisons, according to scientific studies. Nuclear scientists KNOW that the worst place to test for radiation after a nuclear accident is ocean water.

WHY DON’T ANY MARINE BIOLOGISTS OR NUCLEAR SCIENTISTS FOCUS ON, REPORT ON, OR MEASURE RADIATION MOVING UP THE FOOD CHAIN VIA BIOCONCENTRATION OR BIOACCUMULATION?

These alleged nuclear scientists and marine biologists know that the best place to test for radiation is where it concentrates up the food chain, but that is being ignored and denied by the same people saying there is no danger from Fukushima or it’s fallout. Doesn’t it seem odd that they never mention bioaccumulation or bioconcentration?

Doesn’t it seem quite strange that they don’t look in the easiest place to find radiation contamination; in all filter feeders and all the way to the top of the food chain? These nuclear experts know all about this concentration effect up the food chain, but they refuse to point in that direction, and they refuse to test anyone or anything at the top of the food chain, where these radioactive heavy metal poisons concentrate and are much easier to measure than in ocean water…

Fukushima Pacific Ocean Heavy Metal Radioactive Plutonium; How It Bioconcentrates In Mussels, Sea Stars, Chitons, Clams, Oysters, Fish; Arnie Gunderson On Hot Particle Radiation And Bioaccumulation

Of course, no human testing or top of the food chain animals comprehensive testing is being done by anyone, because they might find something. Instead, huge amounts of money and energy are being spent testing ocean water for radiation, the worst place to test, and the LAST place radiation will be found coming from Fukushima. If you ask ocean biologists, and nuclear authorities, NOTHING bad is happening in the ocean.. NOTHING!

How many species have completely disappeared on the West Coast and the Pacific Ocean so far? 1,000? 5,000? And yet, somehow, there are always standard pat answers that avoid any mention of radiation or Fukushima. They KNOW that it is not Fukushima, despite never testing anything or anyone.. How is that science?

Science is about TESTING.

Fake science and fake news is spouting blind dogma, beliefs, plus pro corporate propaganda, but NEVER TESTING.

THE PACIFIC OCEAN IS DOING JUST FINE ACCORDING TO MARINE BIOLOGISTS AT WHOI AND ALL OF THE NUCLEAR PROMOTERS

http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2014/08/why-whoi-woods-hole-and-ken-buesseler.html

AGR is offering to conduct an ongoing yearly beach sand testing project, for Pacific ocean beaches, as well as international beaches, conditioned on receiving funding to accomplish this goal. (links below)

The beach sand radiation testing project is oriented towards both AGR and citizen scientists going out and doing simple CPM radiation readings, reporting them via Youtube (optional) and/or providing those readings and links to AGRP via email (agreenroad at symbol .gmail.com   .

These same beach sand samples can also be tested via radiography, which will show any hot particles that may be present. AGR already has some sand samples from 2014, and can add more to compare them back and forth from 2014 to today’s sand samples.

2017 UPDATE

Fukushima news; March 11 2017 Pismo says don’t eat out of the Pacific Ocean

According to one nuclear researcher, activist and whistle blower, things are going from bad to much worse.

Fukushima news; Nothern California dead tide pools March 10 2017

VIDEO: http://youtu.be/0VoJBBu6x48

2015 – SOMETHING REALLY BAD IS HAPPENING, REPORTS OF TIDE POOLS BEING STERILIZED OF JUST ABOUT ALL LIVING THINGS

BREAKING NEWS: Fukushima nuclear waste detected along Southern California coast — Highest levels seen anywhere in North America since testing program began — 8.4 Bq/m3 of radioactive cesium measured near beach between Los Angeles and San Diego (VIDEO MAP) August 25th, 2015

http://enenews.com/breaking-fukushima-nuclear-waste-detected-along-southern-california-coast-highest-levels-measured-anywhere-north-america-testing-program-began-84-bqm3-radioactive-cesium-beach-between-los-angele/

San Diego Beach                      42 CPM                 1/6/14

Ventura County Beach             50 CPM                 1/2/14

uwantsunVentura Ca

Faria Beach  Sand                    140 CPM                9/23/14                        Inspector Plus

Half Moon Bay, Ca.                         374 CPM                                   2014

Medcom tests Half Moon Bay beach sand

VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CV0GsWPE7pk

More details on Geiger Counter reading of 150 counts per minute maximum at chest level in California on the beach, taken on 12/20/2013; Dave took a reading 2 inches from the sand and got 412 CPM. Full article at http://goo.gl/bDYZvG

The Half Moon Bay (Surfer’s beach), California: 374 CPM reading verifies the 412 CPM beach sand reading above, again. The only question remaining on this beach is what causes the high radiation readings. The health dept claims the radiation is due to red plastic cutlery. Safecast reported it is due to thorium.

Safecast Confirmation Of Radioactive Beach In California

The normal background radiation should be in the range of 28 to 31 CPM, so all of these radiation readings are above background radiation level and above the normal error rate. Now it is important to have someone figure out what is causing this rise in radiation levels.

INTERNATIONAL BEACH SAND RADIATION READINGS

What may also be important is to monitor the dried seaweed radiation levels, because it concentrates radiation, just like sea animals can. Different species will concentrate in different amounts. A lot needs to be tested because one sample can test normal and the next can test 50 Bq/kg, and the next can read 2,000 Bq/kg. Different species will show up with different amounts, so it important to test as many different types as possible to see what is going on in an area.

Unless 1,000 individual critters of all species involved (seaweed, fish, crabs, shellfish and humans are tested MONTHLY and then it is done over again on a monthly basis, it is hard to draw any really firm conclusions about average radiation levels in anything, or how they are changing over time.

SEND IN A SAMPLE AND HAVE IT TESTED FOR $39 BY PETER FEBBRORILLO, WORKING WITH SAFECAST

Would you like to part of this citizen scientist project? Here is one way you can participate and you don’t need to own a radiation detector.

NATURAL RADIATION IS HARMLESS ‘HORMESIS THEORY’ DEBUNKED

It is also important to understand that even ‘natural’ radiation is potentially hazardous; both radon and thorium have negative health effects. For more details on the health hazards of thorium and radon, click on the following link;

Ann Coulter, Forbes, Conca, Corbett Report All Agree; More Heavy Metal Radioactive Poison Is Good For You, Mass Media And Pro Nuclear Industry Hormesis Theory Promoting Propaganda All Agree
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2014/08/ann-coulter-says-more-radiation-is-good.htmlDr. Caldicott MD; Radioactive Thorium Dangers, Half Life, Health Hazards
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/12/dr-calidocott-md-radioactive-thorium.html

Released a day before International Women’s Day, Greenpeace Japan’s report reveals the greater impact on women and children due to both social disadvantages and increased risks to radiation exposure. [1] Greenpeace Japan, Human Rights Now and Fukushima survivor Noriko Matsumoto are calling on the Abe government to comply with Japanese law and address some of the most serious violations.

The above report details how Japan is violating it’s own laws and international agreements around Fukushima negative consequences to it’s own citizens, but no one is held to account.

GREENPEACE 2017-03-07 13:20 – Tokyo, 7 March 2017 – Japan’s policy to resettle residents to heavily contaminated areas in Fukushima is in contravention of Japanese law and multiple international human rights treaties. Greenpeace Japan and Human Rights Now detailed today numerous human rights violations resulting from the Japanese government’s response over the past six years to the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster.

“If there is anything the nuclear industry learned from Chernobyl, it’s that a large exclusion zone is bad for business. It’s a constant reminder that a nuclear disaster is irreversible, and it’s women and children who are bearing the brunt,” said Kendra Ulrich, Senior Global Energy Campaigner with Greenpeace Japan.

Evacuation orders will be lifted in many areas of Iitate no later than 31 March 2017, to be followed one year later by the termination of compensation payments. [3] In 2013, the UN Special Rapporteur Anand Grover called on the Japanese government to rectify numerous issues that violated this fundamental right for Fukushima survivors.

“Japan is obligated under multiple human rights treaties to uphold citizens’ right to health. Instead of acting on the UN’s recommendations, the government has instead enshrined the violation of human rights into formal policy,” said Kazuko Ito, Secretary General of Human Rights Now.

The resettlement policy contravenes the ‘Nuclear Disaster Victims Support Act’ of June 2012 which defines the government’s responsibilities to nuclear survivors. Multiple human rights treaties that Japan is party to also obligate it to uphold citizens’ rights to “the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health”, which includes the right to information and the right to make informed choices regarding their health.

Greenpeace Japan and several Japanese civil society organisations (Human Rights Now, Friends of the Earth Japan, and Green Action Japan), recently sent a letter to the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) Special Rapporteurs asking that they assess the ongoing human rights issues faced by nuclear survivors. [4] Greenpeace will also be submitting comments to the UNHRC as a part of the current Universal Periodic Review of Japan on the plight of Fukushima evacuees.

Notes to editors:

Photos: http://media.greenpeace.org/shoot/27MZIFJJGP9YV 

[1] Unequal Impact: Women’s and Children’s Human Rights Violations and the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster 

[2] Of the 23,013 hectares in Iitate, 5,600 hectares have been decontaminated, much of it ineffectively – MOE: Environmental Remediation – Decontamination

[3] No return to Normal: Feb. 2017 – Greenpeace Iitate Case Studies

[4] Joint NGO Letter to the United Nations Human Rights Council Special RapporteursInternational Greenpeace Petition for Survivors’ Rights

Source; http://m.greenpeace.org/japan/ja/high/news/press/2017/pr201703071/

This nuclear mega disaster has just begun, and it will get gradually worse from here.. Go deeper to understand why….

VIDEO: http://youtu.be/sNrbynPd67M 1 hour plus

What is really difficult to measure and hard to figure out is; what effects is the 400 to 6000 pounds of plutonium that came out of Fukushima, having on the whole ecosystem and on human beings?

How Dangerous Is 400-6000 Pounds Of Plutonium Nano Particle Dust Liberated By Fukushima?

http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2013/08/how-dangerous-is-400-6000-pounds-of.html

Several scientists and research studies have documented that plutonium went around the world, and plutonium from Fukushima was measured in the USA and as far away as Lithuania. Why no plutonium showed up at the site above is a mystery, but there are clean and ‘hot’ radiation spots all around the world, so this could be one of this ‘clean’ plutonium areas.

There was an unpredented release of radiation into the Pacific and all over most of Japan in 2011. That radiation release continues to present day, due to multiple melted out 100 ton corium lava blobs underneath Fukushima.

Even much more sophisticated and expensive equipment than what Safecast used on the beach above has a hard time finding low doses of plutonium in animals, beach sand or plants.

Plutonium contamination is present all over the world, even if it is at very low levels.

The question is; what negative effect is the Fukushima plutonium, tritium, uranium, and buckyballs having on the food chain?

How does one track very low doses of plutonium through the food chain and living food web ecosystems in the Pacific ocean?

Doesn’t anyone want to know?

Or is an extinction level event ok? Everyone can just sleep on, totally unconscious, unaware, blissfully snoozing in absolute apathy, disbelief, denial and delusion?

Have you asked around lately, how many people around you have suffered from one or more bouts of Big C, leukemia or any other hundreds of diseases that low dose ionizing heavy metal radiation initiates, after a latency period, of course. You do know what the latency period is, right? All medical doctors know, but they are quiet about all of this too, for the most part.. After all, they make their living off of it.

End

2011 – 2017 A Green Road Beach Sand/Soil Ocean Radiation Readings; California, Oregon, Washington (800 CPM High Reading) Things Are Going From Bad To Worse, Ocean Biologists, Government, Mass Media Missing In Action, In Complete Denial

http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2014/01/2014-beach-sand-radiation-readings.html

Thank you for including the article link when publishing AGR article(s) elsewhere.

Website and contact page