Here’s why everyone ought to be very concerned about these ‘Red Flag Laws’

 

 

Here’s why everyone ought to be very concerned about these ‘Red Flag Laws’

“Red Flag Laws” Will Lead to Soviet Style Gun Confiscation, Incrementally by Expanded Mental Health Issues for All That Oppose a Communist Takeover in America: Capt. Dave Bertrand, Ret. +Video

BERTRAND DAILY REPORT The War For Your Mind and Soul Continues

By Capt. Dave Bertrand, Ret.

Friends and Associates:

The video below is a tongue-n-cheek look at what a ‘Red Flag Law’ is all about.

Most would agree, ‘Red Flag Laws’ could be very effective when a neighbor, family member or a loved one of sorts, displays an immediate threat to the safety of others and it is known he/she owns a weapon. All it takes is one phone call to law enforcement, and the nightmare begins for the gun owner. If the mentally disturbed individual does not voluntarily give-up his weapons and is ticked-off enough at having a Swat Team tear down his door to remove weapons…….God help the person that made the call.

Here’s the real problem…….

As stated in the video, a majority of psychologists tasked with evaluating the individual suspect of a [possible] thought crime, are approximately 52% non-conservative and are likely anti-gun health officials, while a very small percentage are supporters of the Right to Bear Arms. Others in the survey are questionable.

Also….the “Red Flag Law” opens the door for false claims by ex-wives, neighbors, and their own children….no Due Process until after the gun confiscation event.

How about our military veterans that are mostly Republicans? PTSD or other minor issues could easily become their own nightmare. What can happen as a result of any anti-gun health or psychological questioning…”do you think you have PTSD?” Those that do might very well say no….

Note: If there is a particular segment of society in America the Democrat Communist Party do NOT want armed….the military veteran can and would be very dangerous during a [Hot] Civil War.

If WE allow ‘Pandora’s Box’ to be opened with feel good legislation meant to target those that really need to have their weapons taken from them….the end result is ALWAYS misuse of that power of which can easily expand and re-written by a Democrat Communist controlled government in the future to the extent of outright confiscation under the guise of mental illness.

The Soviet Union used mental illness as the excuse to confiscate weapons and wouldn’t you know….the Soviets declared that all dissent against the government was a mental disease. Sound familiar as this same ruse is evolving now in the U.S.?

As you have noticed, the population hears about a mass shooting and before the dead are buried, there is an immediate rush to know the shooter’s party affiliation. As we just witnessed, the El Paso shooter’s social media postings were edited immediately after the shooting, showing his party affiliation as Democrat before the shooting and changed to Republican accordingly.

That also brings into question about his lengthy manifesto that many say could not have been written by this mentally disturbed kid.

I should also point out……

There are two main states that can cause President Trump to lose the 2020 election and those states are Ohio and Texas. How convenient for the Democrat Communist Party……

The latest FBI Report, stating in the report and emphasizing “White Supremacy” as the reason for increased violence in America, makes no mention of Madonna saying she would “like to blow-up the White House,” or Johnny Dipshit saying, “when was the last time an actor assassinated a president,” or the hag that proudly held the resemblance of Trump’s head in her hand, let alone the constant anti-Trump rhetoric by the other hags on THE VIEW……and the shooting of a Republican, or ANTIFA violence !

Not a mention by the FBI Report or anything close to calling-out the Communists and their ANTIFA.

Therefore…..combine the FBI Report, the shootings in two key states, an outcry by the Communists for gun control, and Trump submitting to the Dems with “Red Flag” laws….we can easily see where it’s all headed.

Yes…”Red Flag Laws” can save lives, but eventually it is a means for incremental gun confiscation, while politicians avoid discussions about real security in schools by arming teachers and the need to encourage more carry concealed classes for citizens.

The other key state in the 2020 election is Florida…..stay vigilant, stay armed.

—Dave Bertrand


Contributor: Bill Crismon

Red Flag Laws are a Red Flag – Video

RED FLAG LAWS: ARE THEY COMING FOR YOUR GUNS?!

On February 14, 2018, a nineteen-year-old former student walked into the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, FL, and fatally shot 17 people. There was an immediate national outcry to “do something” to stop the violence. When information emerged that the shooter had documented mental health issues, lawmakers across the country began pushing for laws that would take away guns from individuals whose behavior raises a “red flag” that he or she could be a threat to themselves or others.

The purpose of these laws is to identify an individual that exhibits early warning signs of danger and prevent a criminal act from occurring by preemptively disarming the individual.

Commonly referred to as “Red Flag” laws, these bills model those already in existence in Connecticut, California, Indiana, Washington, and Oregon. In the fourteen months since the Parkland incident, ten more states have enacted their own versions. These states include Florida, Delaware, New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Maryland, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Colorado. Twenty-three other states have proposed measures of their own as of April 17, 2019.

HOW DO THESE LAWS WORK?

Red Flag bills allow police or family members to petition a state court to remove firearms from a person who presents a danger to themselves or others. At the initial hearing, the petition and evidence are presented supporting the claims the individual in question (the “Respondent”) is a threat. These hearings may be conducted “ex parte,” meaning the respondent is not present to defend himself or herself. If the order is granted, police will execute the order removing firearms with no notice to the Respondent.

READ MORE…………………….