The Warmongers Who Govern US



The Warmongers Who Govern US

As told to Lorena Martin by the interpreter

Being a foreigner, I didn’t care about American politics until fairly recently, when by chance I found myself recruited to serve as interpreter during the negotiations to extricate several tons of gold and cash from Africa. The stash used to belong to Colonel Muammar el-Gaddafi’s government, who had accumulated 143 tons of gold and more or less the same amount of silver (worth more than 7 billion dollars) to establish a pan-African currency—the Dinar—to free Africa’s economy from its dependence on Western currencies.

This, Hillary Clinton knew. The information had been given to her by Sidney Blumenthal, the attorney who defended Bill Clinton in the Monica Lewinsky case. The exchange, dated 2 April 2011, was amongst thousands of declassified e-mails recovered from her private server.

Up until early 2011, Libya was one of Africa’s greatest nations. In fact, Libya was economically independent, it grew its own food, owned its water, and had control of its oil fields. In a world where the newest push has been for the privatization of water, Libya had the world’s largest irrigation system, the Great Man-made River project, which not only brought water from the coastal cities to the desert, it also desalinized and recycled it. This madness had to be stopped.

Gaddafi’s Libya was a country where education was free, medical treatment was provided by the state for free, and having a home was considered an inalienable human right; the country had the lowest infant mortality rate and the highest life expectancy in all of Africa. What’s worse, Libya had the highest Human Development Index, a model Gaddafi planned to spread throughout Africa.

The Colonel’s biggest sin, however, was that the country coined its own money in its state-owned bank. For this outrage, Muammar el-Gaddafi, the autocrat who extricated Libya out of poverty to turn it into one of the richest countries in Africa, had to be eliminated.

For years already, warmongers intent to unleash the next wave of terror in the Middle East had been colluding with Western propaganda to portray Muslims as savages and Gaddafi’s regime as brutal; the time had come to raise the bar. Otherwise, how to justify NATO’s deplorable actions first in Libya, then in Syria?

In March 2011, US-NATO forces bombed the irrigation system and the plant where its components were manufactured, thus throwing the country into chaos. Surprisingly, the people did not welcome the interventionists who were destroying their country under pretext of democracy, but remained loyal to the man who inherited Africa’s poorest country in 1967 and turned it into one of the continent’s richest countries in less than twenty-five years. In view of this, more drastic measures were plotted.

Before anything, a motive had to be manufactured. For this particular intervention, a spin on operation AJAX was launched by the CIA, and on 20 October 2011 the dictator was violently assassinated by a paid rabble. The murder triggered a human rights disaster in Libya, therefore Clinton’s boast during a live interview “We came, we saw, he died” comes across as downright callous, especially when the true meaning behind her conceited doublespeak is “We deceived, we intervened, we murdered.”

Had the course of events ran as planned, Clinton and the Obama Administration that had to protect her in order to protect itself, wouldn’t have attempted to place the blame for an attack in Benghazi that resulted in the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans, on a “spontaneous” protest of enraged individuals because of an anti-Muslim video.

As Clinton’s e-mails clearly state, the attack was a pre-planned operation in which the assailants had full knowledge of the ambassador’s whereabouts. In other disclosed e-mails, Hillary Clinton told her family members and foreign leaders that the administration knew it was a planned terror attack [orchestrated by the CIA]. This is why the U.S. military did not mount an armed response during the attack.

Ultimately, Hillary Clinton’s objectives were money, power, and oil. This I know for a fact because I was brought into one of her schemes in 2013 to serve as interpreter for one of Gaddafi’s former Generals, a man who managed to flee Libya in 2011 with several truckloads of cash and gold.

General Aziz Mustafa used part of his booty to buy political asylum in Chad. As the conflict spread from Libya to the Middle East, he was desperate to leave Africa. For this, he had truckloads of gold to barter with.

I was working as a French teacher when I was brought in to interpret during the Skype negotiations with the General. On my first day, I was asked to sign a confidentiality agreement. I was not allowed to take notes nor was I given the General’s contact information. Furthermore, all the documents produced during the negotiation were shredded after its conclusion. As the operation progressed, I realized the danger I was putting myself into, but it was too late to backtrack. Though nobody put a gun on my head, I intuitively understood that I would not be permitted to leave until they decided that I could go. It is why I secreted a stack of documents to use as protection when the negotiations ended.

When the threats began—which I knew they would, given the illegality of the undertaking—I was able to tell my caller that if something happened to me, the documents would be made public. I then fled the country.

I am aware that a stack of documents is a very frail armor against a criminal elite intent on the destruction of democracy. I hold no illusions about my safety, but I’m tired of having to look over my shoulder whenever I step out. What will it be, I wonder. A rogue automobile when I’m walking across the street? A defenestration? A random mugging gone wrong? It would be ironic to end like that, because so far my political convictions have never been strong. Aside from my interpreting stint of three years ago, for the most part I’ve managed to keep myself on the margin of world affairs. I am not militant. I don’t participate in marches. I don’t raise my voice to protest injustice. Disappointed by how little things change, I hardly ever bother to vote.

It is because of people like me that the status quo of world affairs is worsening. Democracy is being destroyed. The world is controlled by psychopaths. Someone said that the first thing toward solving a problem is to recognize that there is a problem. I recognize that I am part of the problem; my inertia has made me so. Politicians count on the citizens’ civil disattention to pass laws that harm the people and destroy the world. They count on our lack of sympathy for “the other” to kill and displace thousands of people from the countries they invade to steal their resources. We let them get away with murder because it is easier to lose our humanity than be outraged by their crimes.

We are ruled by criminals who punish us in their criminal courts for exposing their crimes. The people of the United States of America are on the verge of being duped into electing what they have been manipulated to believe is the lesser of two evils when in fact the evil is universal. Sitting yet another warmonger on the presidential chair could have devastating consequences, not just for the American people, but for the rest of the world as well. I have known this for a long time, and still I did not exercise my right to do something to stop the psychopaths who are hell-bent on annihilation in order to help the rich get richer. My silence, together with the silence of many others, has made us complicit of their crimes.

After the first call to General Mustafa, a “Rescue Mission” was planned. Indeed, such amount of money and gold could not be left in the hands of a bunch of undeserving negroes when white people—powerful people—felt entitled to it.

CIA operative Culberson gave me instructions to find out where the gold was, and exactly how much of it there was. The General never disclosed his exact whereabouts. “You come here, and when my family and I are in the United States, I will tell you where the gold is,” he said. “Things don’t work like that,” Culberson said. “For all I know, there could be no gold at all.” The General took his laptop to a vault. On one pallet was a stack of gold bullion almost as tall as he was. On another, British pounds and euros. Culberson began to salivate. The General logged off. “Did you get the coordinates?” Culberson asked. The technician shook his head.

Once they realized those assets were most likely not going to be extricated without the General, Miguel D. Lausell joined the negotiations. He had joined Hillary Clinton’s staff on 19 September 2007 as Senior Political Advisor to her campaign. He was also a partner in Royal Global Services Inc., a business front incorporated in Delaware. Lausell also co-owned Madasi Oil Corp. in Puerto Rico. On 11 July 2008, Lausell, his business partner, and Madasi Oil Corp. were sued for fraud.

Other participants in the negotiations were Tomas O. Alvarez Mendoza, Judge of the Supreme Court of Venezuela; the nephew of Director of the International Monetary Fund Christine Lagarde, and the Special Forces team used for Clinton’s covert missions.

After several weeks of intense negotiations, a plan was finally approved by the General: A Special Forces team would fly to Africa by chartered airplane to collect the money and gold, the General, and his family. From there, they would fly to the Cayman islands, where the gold was to be deposited in a vault and the cash into an untraceable bank account. Culberson and Christine Lagarde’s nephew would be there to collect payment for services rendered and to funnel funds to the IMF to be laundered.

From the Cayman islands, the family was to be flown to Puerto Rico to wait for Supreme Court Judge Tomas O. Alvarez, who wold procure the family Venezuelan passports. From Puerto Rico, the family was to enter the United States as tourists. Once there, they would be issued American papers, provided they bought them with a truckload of gold.

It was Operation Paperclip all over again, except this time around, instead of Nazis, the United States government was bringing Muslim families into the country to be issued American citizenship and new identities, all under the noses of the American people.

Sadly, this is not the end of the story, but the beginning of a very tragic reality. Libya, a once prosperous nation with a healthy economy and a level of democracy that would have served as paradigm for the rest of Africa, was punished for daring to aspire to do so.

Libya’s waterworks had been destroyed. Its leader had been murdered. The buildings were reduced to rubble. The gold and silver stolen, the people massacred. So terrible was the carnage, that blood was splattered on the streets. Those who managed to flee, became refugees in Egypt, in Algeria, in central Africa, before they eventually made the perilous journey to Europe.

Five years after the United States-NATO coalition toppled Muammar el-Gaddafi, the country remains in chaos, but a destabilized country suits the vultures who are stealing its resources. Whilst the different factions that emerged afterwards massacre each other, and the Daesh (Islamic State) sprouts in strategic regions, Rothschild minions transfer Libya’s gold to his vaults and take the oil out of the country.

The operation was so successful, that NATO was commanded to attack Syria for its many sins: To begin with, Syria did not have a Central (Rothschild) bank, had no debt with the IMF, World Bank or anybody else; the country had banned genetically modified food; people were well informed about the affairs of the world and were against zionism and Israeli apartheid. Above all, Syria had enormous hydrocarbon and uranium reserves, which Israel wanted, and whatever Israel wants, the United States grants.

The result of this has been the largest refugee crisis Europe has ever seen. So far, close to one and a half million refugees have claimed asylum in Europe, and they keep arriving by the boatload. This is the direct result of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney’s policies and illegal intervention in Iraq, which gave genesis to Al Qaeda. However, it was Henry Kissinger who poisoned the Middle East.

ISIS is the brainchild of Kissinger disciples George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, who, for their own twisted reasons, only made matters worse in the Middle East during their term in office, yet the region’s radicalization can be traced all the way back to Kissinger, the warmonger who together with Robert McNamara manufactured the Vietnam war.

At the start of the Vietnam war, Lê Đức Thọ asked Kissinger “What kind of war do you want, a five year war, a fifty year war, a five hundred year war? Because whatever war you want, we will give it to you.” In spite of Thọ’s warning, pigheaded Kissinger pushed ahead because he was determined “to show everybody—including Britain, France, and the USSR—[his] power and determination so as to pass this message: wherever Americans go, they are irresistible … The Americans are winning everything—except the war,” said Kissinger’s mentor Moshe Dayan.

As it has been recorded by history, the United States did not win this war. It only came to an end when soldiers began to read alternative journalism instead of the propaganda that was being force-fed to them. Enraged by the deceit of those who connived and plotted to unleash this war on innocent people, they mutinied and refused to fight any longer. Many of these mutineers were killed right then and there by their own commanders for refusing to obey, then were reported as “casualties of war” to their families.

ISIS was created and armed by the United States and Israel. The CIA trained it, Hillary Clinton, a warmonger with a record of mendaciousness and villainy, nurtured it. “The U.S. has long used terrorism,” said General William Odom, director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan. The only way to avoid further terrorist attacks, is to stop being terrorists. This is something a warmonger president will not do.

“Much like Al Qaeda, the Islamic State (ISIS) is made-in-the-USA, an instrument of terror designed to divide and conquer the oil-rich Middle East and to counter Iran’s growing influence in the region … ISIS is not merely an instrument of terror used by America to topple the Syrian government; it is also used to put pressure on Iran … The fact that the United States has a long and torrid history of backing terrorist groups will surprise only those who watch the news and ignore history … The CIA first aligned itself with extremist Islam during the Cold War era. The CIA gave birth to Osama Bin Laden and breastfed his organization during the 1980ʹs …”

“The Islamic State is [the CIA’s] latest weapon that, much like Al Qaeda, is certainly backfiring … [The United States] is using ISIS in three ways: to attack its enemies in the Middle East, to serve as a pretext for U.S. military intervention abroad, and at home to foment a manufactured domestic threat, used to justify the unprecedented expansion of invasive domestic surveillance … Terrorism is the symptom; American imperialism in the Middle East is the cancer. Put simply, the War on Terror is terrorism; only, it is conducted on a much larger scale by people with jets and missiles … The Middle East policy revolves around oil and Israel. The invasion of Iraq has partially satisfied Washington’s thirst for oil, but ongoing air strikes in Syria and economic sanctions on Iran have everything to do with Israel” (Garikai Chengu, How the US Helped Create Al Qaeda and ISIS, counterpunch, September 2014).

“The state …. must see the sword as the main if not the only instrument with which to keep its morale high and to retain its moral tension. Toward this end it may— no, it MUST—invent dangers, and to do this it must adopt the method of provocation and revenge …. And above all, let us hope for a new war with the Arab countries so that we may finally get rid of our troubles and acquire our space” (from the diary of Prime Minister of Israel Moshe Sharrett, writing about a conversation with Army Chief of Staff Moshe Dayan, May 1955).