High Treason In Full Public View?—-Are “Persons of Interest” Hillary and Bill Clinton Betraying Operatives Working For America’s Deadliest Foreign Enemy?
October 27, 2016
From: Steve Boyle, American National Service
With only a few adjustments to the Hall of Mirrors world we currently live in, the perspective of the American people can be brought into true focus as we near November 8th. The adjustments involve connecting just a few remaining dots to explain “how the world actually works.” as it pertains to Hillary and Bill Clinton. In this context, it is assumed that if Hillary becomes President, Bill will be installed in the White House as an advisor, thus creating a third (and possibly fourth) Presidential term for the Clinton family.
Dot #1: Why Are Hillary and Bill Clinton Involving Themselves With The Top Globalist Rothschild Banking Family?
British Evelyn de Rothschild (second from left) and his cousin Jacob Rothschild (see in following photograph, below) control and manage of the affairs of the Rothschild Banking Family in the City of London and participate in the coordination of a shadowy clique of British and European banking families.
Hillary Clinton, Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, former President Bill Clinton, and Lynn Forester de Rothschild
The Best Way To Understand The Interrelationship Of Hillary and Bill With The Rothschild Banking Family and Their Clique of Foreign, Dynastic Banking Families In the City of London Is To Follow The Leaked WikiLeaks Material
(Highlighting for emphasis will be done in red. My commentary will be done in blue.)
Dot #2: What Is THIS All About?
Hillary’s Massive Meltdown “If that F – – – ing Bastard Wins, We All Hang from Nooses!
By Bill Still
Hillary is afraid of the gallows if Trump wins. She was interviewed by Matt Lauer and went off in a tirade of cursing. Hillary said: ” If that f – – – ing bastard wins, we all hang from nooses!” Camera’s were not allowed to film the massive meltdown. But the staffers couldn’t believe how horrible she was.
Remember the Sept. 7 Commander-in-Chief Forum where Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton appeared separately but back-to-back for 30 minutes each?
According to an email forwarded to us late last night, which originated from a Comcast email address, the technical crew for NBC which produced the event is now speaking out about what took place moments after Clinton walked off the set – a massive profanity-laced tirade aimed at NBC’s host, Matt Lauer.
It turned out that Clinton had been fed all the questions for approval in advance of the forum.
According to a Comcast official (the parent company of NBC Universal) who apparently was quoting those on the set:
“When Matt posed the one legitimate question about the FBI investigation concerning her homemade server and the unsecured emails, we could see she was beginning to boil.”
According to an NBC Associate Producer of the Forum, as soon as Clinton got off the set, she exploded.
“Hillary proceeded to pick up a full glass of water and throw it at the face of her assistant, and the screaming started.”
“She was in a full meltdown and no one on her staff dared speak with her – she went kind of manic and didn’t have any control over herself at that point.”
“How these people work with this woman is amazing to me. She really didn’t seem to care who heard any of it.”
“You really had to see this to believe it. She came apart – literally unglued; she is the most foul-mouthed woman I’ve ever heard … and that voice at screech level … awful!”
“She screamed she’d get that f…..ing Lauer fired for this.”
Referring to Donald Trump, Clinton said:
“If that f – – – ing bastard wins, we all hang from nooses! Lauer’s finished…and if I lose it’s all on your heads for screwing this up.”
So, Crooked Hillary fears the gallows, eh? Interesting.
Her dozen or more aides were visibly disturbed and tried to calm her down when she started shaking uncontrollably, as she screamed to get an executive at Comcast the parent company of NBC Universal, on the phone. Then, two rather large aides grabbed her and helped her walk to her car.
Matt Lauer was massively criticized for the rest of the week on air by the Clinton campaign and the rest of the MSM as having conducted:
“an unfair and partisan attack on Clinton.”
According to the email, calls were made to the New York Times, the Washington Post, Huffington Post and Twitter executives with orders to crush Matt Lauer.
One staffer on the Clinton campaign told the NBC staff that they all fear Clinton’s wrath and uncontrollable outbursts, and one described Hillary as “an egotistical psychopath.”
Since Hillary does not allow any staff to have cell phones when she is in their presence, no footage is available.
Interim DNC chairman Donna Brazile, the first black woman to hold the position, was singled out by Hillary during the rant. She screamed at Donna:
“I’m so sick of your face. You stare at the wall like a brain dead buffalo, while letting that f – – – ing Lauer get away with this. What are you good for, really? Get the f – – – to work janitoring this mess – do I make myself clear?”
A female NBC executive said that Donna Brazile looked at Mrs. Clinton and never flinched, which seemed to enrage Hillary all the more. The executive continued:
“It was the most awful and terrible…and racist display – such a profane meltdown I have ever witnessed from anyone, and I will never forget it.
“That woman should never see the inside of the oval office I can tell you that. She was unhinged and just continued to verbally abuse everyone – she was out of control.”
Why did Lauer ask his rogue question? According to sources close to Lauer, because:
“… the American people deserve an answer from the former Secretary of State.”
(End of Before It’s News article)
Dot #3: Top Globalist Rothschild Banking Family Is Grooming Hillary for Presidency
WikiLeaks Show Rothschilds Grooming Clinton for Presidency — Months Before She Launched Candidacy
October 19, 2016
As Wikileaks reveals in the ongoing hugely-damaging release of John Podesta’s files, Lynn Forester de Rothschild, who maintains an incredibly cozy personal relationship with the Clintons, was already forming Hillary’s economic policy in January 2015 — long before the former secretary of state announced her candidacy.
(Commentary: Let’s hold up right here. Why is the Presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton allowing representatives of a foreign banking family to help her craft the future economic policy of the United States?)
On January 7, 2015, Lady Rothschild wrote to top Clinton aide, Cheryl Mills, under the subject heading “FW: Elizabeth Warren”:
“I think this blog overstates what Warren was doing, but we need to craft the economic message for Hillary so that Warren’s common inaccurate conclusions are addressed. Xoxo Lynn.”
(Commentary: And why is Hillary Clinton allowing her staff, through Cheryl Mills, to establish communication with representatives of the Rothschild Banking Family, especially concerning the 2016 Presidential Election process?)
In the blog Rothschild refers to, Warren attacks Clinton’s close association with Big Banks and Wall Street, by highlighting how enormous free trade deals and banking deregulation line the wallets of the elite at the expense of the working class.
Of course, the irony of both Lady Rothschild’s concern and her heralding the “need to craft” Hillary’s “economic message” cannot be overstated.
Heading an elite global banking empire, the notorious — or, more aptly, nefarious — Rothschild family collectively shapes the planet’s economic and, thus, political policies. Lynn Forester de Rothschild, who married billionaire financier Sir Evelyn de Rothschild in 2000, plays prominently throughout Clinton’s political career — including her tenure at the State Department. In fact, it could easily be argued Clinton’s Big Bank loyalty more accurately lies specifically with the Rothschild family.
Wikileaks’ previous release of Hillary Clinton’s emails disclosed an April 2010 exchange in which Rothschild tells Clinton under the subject heading “Miss you” that she “would love to catch up” and “I remain your loyal adoring pal.” Clinton responds in kind, “let’s make that happen,” and signs off, “Much love, H.”
Then in September 2010, Clinton messaged Rothschild, “I was trying to reach you to tell you and Teddy that I asked Tony Blair to go to Israel as part of our full court press on keeping the Middle East negotiations going.” She also asks, “Let me know what penance I owe you.”
Rothschild thanks Clinton for “personally reaching out to us,” and notes, “You are the best, and we remain your biggest fans. Sweet dreams and Godspeed with everything you are doing
In January 2012, Clinton emailed aides, reminding them about an upcoming “conference in England about climate change … sponsored by Jacob Rothschild at his historic estate, Waddesdon.”
And the Rothschild influence obviously continues — on May 12 this year, Clinton showed her true colors by attending a $100,000-per-plate fundraising dinner hosted by none other than Lynn Forester de Rothschild.
(Commentary: The question has to be asked: Is Hillary Clinton working for America or is she working for representatives of a foreign banking family. The Rothschilds are paying her significant money (a $100,000 a plate fundraiser is quite extraordinary) and “helping her craft the economic policy of the United States of America.” Why isn’t Hillary working with members of the U.S. government and economic consultants on her transition team?
Despite their insidious and overwhelming influence in global geopolitics and finance, the Rothschild dynasty manages to shield themselves from public scrutiny — an estimated trillion-dollar fortune makes such evasion simple. When snippets of their intimate relationships with the political and financial elite do surface, it only adds to the all-but-proven theory the Rothschilds essentially rule the globe through puppet politicians.
Considering Lynn Forester de Rothschild’s apparent hand in potential President Hillary Clinton’s economic policy, such theories don’t appear so far from the truth — and only further prove the United States has strayed from its democratically-based roots to become a banking and corporate plutocracy.
(Commentary: Just this short article should trigger a Congressional hearing about what Hillary Clinton thinks she is doing and who she thinks she is representing in taking a large amount of money from the Rothschild banking family and involving them in new American economic policy-making?)
(End of Free Thought Project article)
Dot #4: Top Globalist Rothschild Banking Family Is Helping Fund Hillary’s Presidential Campaign; Very Tight Personal Relationship Between Hillary and Lynn Forester de Rothschild
Selected not Elected — Rothschilds Hold $100,000 a Plate Dinner Fundraiser for Guess Who
May 15, 2016
The Rothschild banking dynasty is a family line that has been accused of pulling the political strings of many different governments through their control of various economic systems throughout the world. Historically, there is ample evidence to prove that the family has used its vast fortune to control the political apparatus of numerous nations throughout history, toppling regimes and bringing entire economies to their knees.
Although the Rothschild family now keeps a very low public profile, they still have significant business operations across a wide spectrum of sectors. While you may not find any one particular Rothschild on the Forbes’ most rich list, the family is estimated to control $1 trillion dollars in assets across the globe, thus having an extremely strong voice across the geopolitical/economic spectrum that many perceive as a hidden hand manipulating events silently from behind a veil of virtual secrecy and silence.
On September 23, 2010, Clinton emailed Lynn Forester de Rothschild (an email chain marked by heavy redaction) saying, “I was trying to reach you to tell you and Teddy that I asked Tony Blair to go to Israel as part of our full court press on keeping the Middle East negotiations going …”
Rothschild responds, thanking Clinton for “personally reaching out to us,” and adds, “You are the best, and we remain your biggest fans.”
This correspondence gives the greatest insight into the fact that the Rothschild family works behind the scenes to use their enormous clout to forward a geopolitical agenda using their bought and paid for politicians as a means to an end.
A January 9, 2012, email discusses a conference on the environment set to take place at Jacob Rothschild’s “historic estate, Waddesdon.”
It’s clear that while Hillary Clinton is a politician who often attempts to publicly portray herself as a candidate looking out for the interests of the common working American — a notion that has been widely challenged during this election cycle due to her adamant refusal to release the transcripts of her 12 speeches to various Wall Street institutions – for which she received almost $3 million dollars in compensation, a sum greater than most Americans will earn in their lifetimes.
The evidence of politicians for sale to the highest bidder lends credibility to a 2014 study from Princeton University that revealed the U.S. is not a republic or a democracy, but rather an oligarchy. An oligarchy is a form of government in which power resides in the hands of a small number of elites within a society.
For ruling class politicians to disingenuously act as if they are simple representatives of the people, when they clearly act in the interest of the billion-dollar oligarchs who finance their political adventurism, reveals a political system that clearly lacks legitimacy. The hijacking of the U.S. levers of power by a handful of elite families and institutions using crony politicians such as Clinton is unmistakable.
(End of Free Thought Project article)
Dot #5: Hillary’s Close Ties With The World’s Two Top Globalists: The Rothschild Banking Family and Rockefeller Banking Family Why?
We Searched Hillary’s Emails & Her Relationship With Rothschild/Rockefeller is Now on Full Display
March 21, 2016
Hillary Clinton has been deemed a sure bet for the White House, as it’s widely speculated the inflammatory Donald Trump and socialist-leaning Bernie Sanders stray too far from establishment politics to be truly electable. But it wasn’t until an examination using Wikileaks searchable archive of Clinton’s emails that the establishment’s love of the Democratic warhawk became truly apparent.
Buried in thousands of the former Secretary of State’s emails sent via her personal server, are intimations of her close relationship with the infamous Rothschild banking family and hints for a potential Rockefeller-State partnership.
Lynn Forester de Rothschild wrote an email on April 18, 2010, in which she tells Hillary she would “love to catch up” — and “I remain your loyal adoring pal.” Clinton responds “let’s make that happen,” and signs her response, “Much love, H.”
On September 23, 2010, Clinton emailed Lynn Forester de Rothschild (an email chain marked by heavy redaction) saying, “I was trying to reach you to tell you and Teddy that I asked Tony Blair to go to Israel as part of our full court press on keeping the Middle East negotiations going …”
A January 9, 2012, email discusses a conference on the environment set to take place at Jacob Rothschild’s “historic estate, Waddesdon.”
On New Year’s Eve 2012, Lynn Forester de Rothschild sent an email to Clinton “praying for” her speedy recovery. “And, my email box is lighting up with all the PUMA’s and their 18M prayers for Hillary campaign,” states the email, which is signed, “Love, Lynn, Evelyn, Ben and Jake.”
An email to Clinton, dated October 15, 2009, from Melanne Verveer — former director of Pres. Obama’s State Department office for Global Women’s Issues and longtime Clinton family insider — states:
“Speaking at UNESCO Monday with the new director on the unfinished Beijing agenda [REDACTED] called to say she wants to give us several million dollars to subsidize a fund to give an annual award for innovation in empowering women that would be a rockefeller-State [sic] partnership.”
Then, on March 10, 2012, Verveer hints at least at a possible locale for Hillary’s future endeavors:
“I forgot to tell you that Judith Rodin offered you a suite of offices after you leave State for your own use at Rockefeller Fdtn, if you’re interested –with no strings attached. She also said they’d be happy to provide you with a month at their center in Bellagio if you just want to read and write in a beautiful place.”
Though none of the emails The Free Thought Project examined appeared overtly damning — thanks, in part, to sometimes heavy redaction — the evidence of Clinton’s comfort with the establishment lends credence to theories of her being the ‘chosen’ candidate.
Numerous emails evidence Hillary’s staff carefully monitoring — and even manipulating—mainstream news outlets as well. Lynn F. de Rothschild told Hillary in August 2009 about a fluff piece journalist Les Gelb was eager to pen for Parade Magazine. Other emails show an almost paranoid eye Clinton kept trained on the Tea Party and its journalists and mouthpieces.
To reiterate, nothing particularly damning in itself was found in this admittedly cursory search — but the relationships these emails document, alone, evidence Hillary’s concrete establishment roots. While Trump infuriates the GOP and Sanders’ popular support lacks translation into delegate votes, perhaps these documents support the popular theory Hillary Clinton will be the next president — no matter what.
(End of Free Thought Project article)
Dot #6: Hillary Subverts The Primary and Election Process And Violates The U.S. Constitution By Collusion With The Treasonous “Mainstream Media”
WikiLeaks’ 10 Most Damning Clinton Emails that Prove Mainstream Media is Scripted & Controlled
October 18, 2016 95 Comments
Washington, D.C. – With information coming out of WikiLeaks at a fast and furious pace, it’s difficult for the average person to keep up with the many bombshell revelations being exposed. This is happening so much that the most damning evidence is ending up as background noise in the 24-hour election news cycle without ever making it into the mainstream news.
On October 7th, 2016, WikiLeaks publish thousands of emails belonging to John Podesta’s private email archives. More emails have been released in the days that followed. Podesta is Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign Chairman. He previously served as Chief of Staff to President Bill Clinton and Counselor to President Barack Obama.
The Podesta emails give insight into why there has been such little fanfare in the mainstream media regarding many of the most damning allegations against Clinton.The fact that most of the newsworthy information contained in the emails is not being reported by the corporate media is indicative of the incestuous relationship between the mainstream media and the Clinton campaign – and is on full display in the Podesta emails.
While there are dozens of bombshell revelations contained within the emails –including transcripts of speeches to Wall St. banks that Clinton had refused to release, hidden policy positions, and evidence of collusion with brutal regimes – the most damning is the collusion and control of the U.S. media on display in the emails.
Essentially, the media has been weaponized as a means of controlling public opinion by propagandizing the American people. World renowned academic Noam Chomsky, in his book “Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media,” detailed how U.S. media frequently serve as an errand boy for U.S. corporate, military and imperial interests.
Chomsky forwarded the idea of what he called a “propaganda model.” Although the book was written in 1988, it speaks precisely to what is currently taking place and clearly revealed in the Podesta emails.
“The media serve, and propagandize on behalf of, the powerful societal interests that control and finance them. The representatives of these interests have important agendas and principles that they want to advance, and they are well positioned to shape and constrain media policy.”
-Chomsky With knowledge of what is currently transpiring, here are the ten most damning Clinton emails regarding the media’s collusion with her presidential campaign, with hotlinks to the original WikiLeaks release.
1. Clinton Staff hosts private “off-the-record cocktail party” with 38 “influential” reporters, journalists, editors, and anchors (from 16 different mainstream media outlets including CNN, NBC, CBS, NYT, MSNBC, & more) with the stated goal of “framing the race.”
2. Donna Brazile (CNN contributor at the time, and current DNC Chairman now) leaked CNN town hall questions to Hillary Clinton’s staff prior to the debate.
3. Clinton campaign and the New York Times coordinating attack strategy against Trump.
4. Glen Thrush, POLITICO’s chief political correspondent and senior staff writer for POLITICO Magazine, sends John Podesta an article for his approval. Writes: “Please don’t share or tell anyone I did this. Tell me if I fucked up anything.”
5. Huffington Post contributor Frank Islam writes to John Podesta in an email titled “My blogs in the Huffington Post”, says “I am committed to make sure she is elected the next president.” “Please let me know if I can be of any service to you.”
6. Clinton staffer “Placing a story” with Politico / New York Times: “place a story with a friendly journalist” “we have a very good relationship with Maggie Haberman of Politico” “we should shape likely leaks in the best light for HRC.”
7. John Podesta receiving drafts of New York Times articles before they’re published.Clinton staff “placing a story with a friendly at the AP (Matt Lee or Bradley Klapper).”More media collusion: NYT and AP “helpful” to Clinton campaign.
8. Clinton staff colluding with New York Times and Wall Street Journal to paint Hillary’s economic policies in a “progressive” light.
9. CNBC panelist colluding with John Podesta on what to ask Trump when he calls in for aninterview.
10. Clinton staff appearing to control the release times of Associated Press articles.The reality revealed in these emails is one of media collusion with powerful interests, which only serve to keep the American people in the dark about what is actually transpiring. The exact opposite of transparency.Please share this article to wake people up to the fact that their news is scripted by powerful entities as a means of influencing people’s perceptions!
(End of Free Thought Project article)
Dot #7: Hillary Subverts The Primary and Election Process And Violates The U.S. Constitution By Collusion With The Treasonous “Mainstream Media”
WikiLeaks List Exposes At Least 65 Corporate ‘Presstitutes’ Who Colluded to Hide Clinton’s Crimes
Thanks to Wikileaks and the Intercept, in fact, we now have a list of no less than 65 mainstream “reporters” whose campaign coverage constitutes propaganda for the Clinton campaign — and no wonder, considering the obscenely lopsided drivel presented by their outlets.
As (actual) journalists Glenn Greenwald and Lee Fang reported on October 9, the Intercept exclusively received documents obtained by the source known as Guccifer 2.0 evidencing Clinton campaign tactics to court journalists portraying the former secretary of state in a positive light.
“As these internal documents demonstrate,” the Intercept reported, “a central component of the Clinton campaign strategy is ensuring that journalists they believe are favorable to Clinton are tasked to report the stories the campaign wants circulated.
“At times, Clinton’s campaign staff not only internally drafted the stories they wanted published but even specified what should be quoted ‘on background’ and what should be described as ‘on the record.’”
Under the — not-at-all oblique insult to the fundamentals of journalism — heading “Placing a Story,” the memo’s author wrote:
“As we discussed on our call, we are all in agreement that the time is right [to] place a story with a friendly journalist in the coming days that positions us a little more transparently while achieving the above goals.”
Specifically named as a suggested journalist plant is Maggie Haberman of Politico, whom they note will assist in doing “the most shaping” of the narrative they have in mind.
Haberman, however, is far from the only pro-Clinton media shill. As the Intercept noted, a review of the metadata for one of the obtained documents found it had been penned by campaign communications director, Jennifer Palmieri — who created a list of ostensible pundits and journalists potentially amenable to targeting with the pro-Clinton message.
The Intercept also revealed an R.S.V.P. list of 38 media friendlies invited to a pre-campaign announcement soiree with ‘top campaign aides’ at the home of strategist Joel Benenson last year on April 10, which was “a fully off-the-record gathering designed to impart the campaign’s messaging.”
Although the outlets they represented unsurprisingly included left-leaning MSNBC, Huffington Post, and Politico, the list also includes journalists from the Daily Beast, Vice, Vox, The New Yorker, and even People Magazine.
In the Wikileaks document, the true scope of Clinton campaign skulduggery is revealed in another lengthy guest list for a parallel function hosted by Mr. Leaked Emails, himself, John Podesta, on April 9 last year.
Press secretary Jesse Ferguson — who authored both lists — wrote to the top members of Clinton’s team:
“Here is the current RSVP list to the Thursday Night (4/9) dinner at Podesta’s. As a reminder, this is with the 25 reporters more closely following HRC (aka the future bus).”
Although the collusion between the media and both the Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee has graciously trickled out thanks to leaked documents from Wikileaks and others, these lists of named journalists willing to cross the line between journalism and campaigning are shameful — if not helpful tools to know with certainty whose reporting is garbage.
In fact, besides obliterating any previous claims of unbiased journalism made by the once-prestigious media institutions dotting these lists, the names and practices described prove mainstream media is effectively moot — by its own hand.
Dot #8: Hillary Globalist Plan Works To Dumb Down The American Public To Prepare Them For Surrendering America, American Rights, and the U.S. Constitution and Forcing the American People Into Serfdom In The Globalist One-World Government
Wikileaks Emails Show Clinton Insiders “Conspired to Produce an Unaware and Compliant Citizenry”
In this particular exchange, Bill Ivey — Chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts under President Bill Clinton — wrote to Podesta in apprehension Hillary Clinton “is not an entertainer” and thus won’t be able to compete with bombastic reality star Donald Trump.
Ivey queries Podesta how they could “offset” this unexpected flaw in Clinton not being a “celebrity in the Trump, Kardashian mold.”
But what Ivey states next in this lamentation characteristic of 2016’s surreality has become the subject of hushed debate — because if his words are to be taken literally, they portend a possible methodological collusion to keep Americans docile and submissive — perhaps in the vein of panem et circenses.
Ivey wrote on March 13, 2016, with emphasis added:
While it has indeed been posited the presidential debates have devolved to little more than bread and circuses — the ultimate intoxicating distraction for the masses — the tone of Ivey’s email does connote a darker subplot to the now veritably proven rigging affected by the DNC in conjunction with Hillary’s campaign.
And not just the rigging of elections, alone, but any one of several leaks of documents from Guccifer 2.0, Wikileaks, disclosures through Freedom of Information Act requests, FBI Director James Comey’s abrupt announcement not to recommend charges against the former secretary of state, and multiple allegations of fraud stemming from the nascent presidential primary season should — for their blatant evidence of at least something untoward — should by now have convinced the nation this is all pure theater.
Theater, that is, tasked with keeping the distraction infinitely more attention-snatching than even the flagrant corruption, arrogance, ignorance, and general brutishness displayed — quite honestly — from both parties.
But, perhaps in desperation not to see either one of the most despised candidates in decades take a seat in the Oval Office — coupled with the reality-TV spectacle of scandal on display — voters have indeed gone a bit rogue in their outrage.
Ivey bemoans Trump’s literal status as entertainer while apparently ignoring the equally ratings-grabbing specter of Clinton’s past. He wrote:
“Well, we all thought the big problem for our US democracy was Citizens United/Koch Brothers big money in politics. Silly us; turns out that money isn’t all that important if you can conflate entertainment with the electoral process. Trump masters TV, TV so-called news picks up and repeats and repeats to death this opinionated blowhard and his hairbrained ideas, free-floating discontent attaches to a seeming strongman and we’re off and running.”
For those old enough to remember many other elections, this cycle has veered unequivocally toward the bizarre, as Ivey somewhat rhetorically asks Podesta,
“How does this get handled in the general?”
The wise among us could answer simply, boycott the vote — this rotten, broken system is rigged for its own demise. Lead yourself. Don’t be compliant. Subvert and work outside this box intended to sculpt your obedience.
Because, if what Ivey discussed about an unaware and compliant citizenry is to be interpreted in the literal, the more hell and awareness you raise, the better someone will hear you.
Dot #9: Hillary Engineers Globalist Scheme To Involve America In Funding and Supporting ISIS, While Telling the American People That America Is Fighting ISIS—-Massive Deception To Perpetuate Continuous War
WikiLeaks Exposes Hillary’s Stunning Connection to ISIS — Mainstream Media Blackout Ensues
Staying true to their word, WikiLeaks, with one simple tweet, dropped another bomb on the Clinton campaign – one so damaging it will almost surely be ignored by the mainstream media.
The latest revelation by the whistleblower organization reveals Hillary Clinton was a director of, and received over $100,000 from, French industrial giant Lafarge, which was recently exposed as secretly sponsoring the Islamic State for profit.
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) August 1, 2016
These latest revelations expose the deep relationship between Hillary Clinton and Lafarge — a company proven to be working with and funding ISIS. The information was released one week after a statement made by Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, during an interview with Democracy Now, implicated Clinton as being connected to arming terrorists.
“Hillary’s hacked emails include info on Hillary arming jihadists,” Assange said.According to an investigative report in The Canary by respected academic and journalist Nafeez Ahmed:
Documents obtained by several journalistic investigations reveal that Lafarge has paid taxes to the terror group to operate its cement plant in Syria, and even bought Isis oil for years…
Lafarge also has close ties to Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Apart from being a regular donor to the Clinton Foundation, Clinton herself was a director of Lafarge in the early 1990s, and did legal work for the firm in the 1980s. During her connection to Lafarge, the firm was implicated in facilitating a CIA-backed covert arms export network to Saddam Hussein.
Among its earliest benefactors was former First Lady and current presidential hopeful, Hillary Clinton. From 1990 to 1992, Clinton served on Lafarge’s Board of Directors. Under her tenure, Lafarge’s Ohio subsidiary was caught burning hazardous waste to fuel cement plants. Clinton defended the decision at the time.
Then just before her husband, Bill Clinton, was elected president in 1992, Lafarge was fined $1.8 million by the Environmental Protection Agency for these pollution violations. Hillary Clinton had left the board of Lafarge in spring, just after her husband won the Democrat nomination. A year later, under Bill’s presidency, the Clinton administration reduced Lafarge’s EPA fine to less than $600,000.
This type of quid-pro-quo is found to be common throughout the whole of the political apparatus in the U.S. However, it has become a specialty of the Clintons, a la the Clinton Foundation/State Department pay for play schemes, which we highlighted in a recent article.
The investigative report by The Canary goes on to reveal the nefarious nature of the Clinton/Lafarge connection:
In the late 1980s, according to an archived investigative report in the American Spectator, Hillary Clinton was connected to Lafarge when the firm was involved in facilitating CIA support for Saddam Hussein’s secret weapons programme.
The American Spectator report from November 1996 cited sources confirming that Hillary Clinton did legal work for Lafarge in the late 1980s before she became a director. The report also claimed that Lafarge’s US subsidiary:
“provided key services for the covert arms export network that supplied Saddam Hussein. To prevent exposure of that secret supply line, and collateral damage to Hillary Clinton – who joined Lafarge board in 1990, just as the arms pipeline was being shut down… the Justice Department was told to bury the investigation… But investigators from other US government agencies who worked on the case say they were ‘waved off’ whenever they got too close to exposing the direct involvement of the intelligence community in the arms export scheme.”Lafarge remains close to the Clintons to this day. In 2013, Lafarge’s Executive Vice President for Operations, Eric Olson, was a ‘featured attendee’ at the Clinton Global Initiative’s annual meeting.
The company is a regular donor to the Clinton Foundation – the firm’s up to $100,000 donation was listed in its annual donor list for 2015. Lafarge is also listed again as a donor to the Clinton Foundation for the first quarter of 2016.
The dark reality of these connections to the Clinton apparatus should raise serious red flags, and must be brought to light for the American public to see.
The American people have a right to see the types of activities that have been carried out by Hillary Clinton and her cronies. Since the mainstream corporate media refuses to provide a modicum of in-depth investigative coverage of the nefarious deeds undertaken by the Clintons, it is up to citizens on social media to help awaken the sleeping masses.
Please share this critical information far and wide and help expose the depths of Hillary’s corruption!
Dot #10: Hillary and Bill Clinton’s Undisclosed Globalist Beliefs and Plans, Including Formation of North American Union of America, Canada, and Mexico As Step To Destroy American National Sovereignty And To Force The American People Into Their New World Order Fantasy
In closed-door remarks delivered to a foreign bank, Hillary Clinton declared that her “dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders.”
This statement from one of Clinton’s private paid speeches was discovered in leaked emails of Clinton’s campaign chair, John Podesta, which were made public by WikiLeaks.
One email, which provided partial transcripts of some of Clinton’s speeches, reads in part:
*Hillary Clinton Said Her Dream Is A Hemispheric Common Market, With Open Trade And Open Markets.
“My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere.” [05162013 Remarks to Banco Itau.doc, p. 28]
In her remarks to Banco Itau, Clinton also denounced the idea of putting up barriers to global trade, a statement which will likely raise concerns with grassroots and working-class voters in her own party. “We have to resist protectionism, other kinds of barriers to market access and to trade,” Clinton said.
Even though it has gone virtually unreported by corporate media, BreitbartNews has extensively documented the Clintons’ longstanding support for “open borders.” Interestingly, as the LosAngelesTimes observed in 2007, the Clinton’s praise for globalization and open borders frequently comes when they are speaking before a wealthy foreign audiences and donors.
In July 2007, Bill Clinton praised the benefits of “open borders” and “easy immigration” while delivering the keynote address at the 16th Telugu Association of North America (TANA) conference in Washington D.C. to a crowd of thousands of Indian Americans. As the LosAngelesTimes reported at the time, Clinton “drew applause at a conference of 14,000 Indian Americans in Washington as he extolled the benefits of ‘open borders, easy travel, easy immigration.’” It went on to report, “The same day, he headlined a fundraiser at the conference for his wife’s [failed 2008 presidential] campaign.”
In a 2003 speech delivered to Yale University, Bill Clinton called for the establishment of a “global community,” praised the “openness of our borders to immigrants,” and declared that America “has great obligations to open our borders.” Clinton said that he believes the formation a “genuine global community”—complete with an “over-arching system” to regulate it—to be “the great mission of the 21st century.”
The latest WikiLeaks revelation documenting Hillary Clinton’s explicit support for “open borders” may pose unique challenges to her campaign, as it means that for months, Clinton’s campaign has deliberately sought to mislead the American people about her position on immigration.
Clinton’s campaign website promoted material insisting that the “claim that Hillary Clinton supports open borders” is “false”– even though, by Clinton’s own admission, “open borders” is her “dream.”
Clinton’s new pushback against publicly labeling herself as for “open borders” while clearly championing open border policies is perhaps related to the fact that increasing immigration levels is not a popular policy. According to Pew, an overwhelming 83 percent of the American electorate overall would like to see immigration levels frozen or reduced.
Clinton’s newly revealed remarks are equally interesting in that they demonstrate corporate media’s failure to meaningfully examine or accurately report on Clinton’s immigration position.
Indeed, for months, while Republican nominee Donald Trump has repeatedly made the case that his opponent supports open borders, many in the media have denounced Trump’s assertion as false—without providing any substantive evidence to counter his claim.
For instance, Politifact, the Associated Press, CNN, FactCheck.org, and The Washington Post have all tried to argue that it’s not true that Clinton supports open borders. In doing so, these “fact checkers” have demonstrated that they either don’t know what “open borders” means, or they are deliberately parroting talking points provided by the Clinton campaign to cover up Clinton’s record on the issue.
Interestingly, these so-called “fact checks” rarely mention how many migrants would be imported into the country under a Hillary Clinton Presidency. While Bill Clinton has described our current immigration policy as one of “open borders,” his wife has championed policies that would open our borders even further.
- For example, the 2013 Gang of Eight bill Clinton supported would have tripled green card issuances—permanently resettling 33 million foreign nationals on green cards in the span of a single decade—and would have doubled foreign guest worker visas to compete for American jobs.
- The 2006 Ted Kennedy immigration plan Clinton supported would have more than doubled legal immigration by increasing the number of family-based and employment-based visas.
- Clinton’s refugee program, which she outlined in 2015, calls for a 550 percent increase the number of Syrian refugees admitted. If Clinton were to continue this policy throughout her presidency, the U.S. could potentially permanently resettle nearly one million Muslim migrants during the first term of her presidency alone—and all of their children born on American soil would be automatically awarded U.S. citizenship.
- The Center for Immigration Studies’ Steve Camarota has projected that, based on the minimal figures Clinton has put forth thus far, Clinton could add 10 million new immigrants to the U.S. during her first term alone – in addition to the 11 million illegal immigrants Clinton has said she plans to amnesty within her first 100 days in office.
(End of Newsl.Org article)
Dot #11: WikiLeaks Reveals Hillary’s Undisclosed Globalist Beliefs and Plans In Her Secret Speeches To The Top Globalist Wall Street Banks
‘Holy grail of US journalism’: WikiLeaks releases transcripts of Clinton’s paid Wall St. speeches
The highlighted texts were taken from John Podesta’s hacked email account, and published by WikiLeaks along with the eighth batch of Clinton’s campaign chair’s emails.
The speeches were made at private events back in 2013 after Clinton had already left the State Department.
WikiLeaks obtained and released today an American journalism “holy grail” — Hillary Clinton’s Goldman Sachs transcripts. Three of them.
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 16, 2016
The transcripts were attached to a January 23, 2016 email titled “Goldman Sachs paid speeches” sent by top campaign aide Tony Carrk, who apparently marked potentially problematic passages should the speeches ever be made public.
‘To intervene in Syria as covertly as possible’
In her June 2013 speech at a Goldman Sachs conference in South Clinton spoke of US’ foreign policy, saying she would like the US to intervene in Syria as “covertly as is possible.”
“The problem for the US and the Europeans has been from the very beginning: what is it you – who is it you are going to try to arm? […] How do intervene – my view was you intervene as covertly as is possible for Americans to intervene. We used to be much better at this than we are now. Now, you know, everybody can’t help themselves. They have to go out and tell their friendly reporters and somebody else: Look what we’re doing and I want credit for it, and all the rest of it,” Clinton said.
‘Putin too defensive’
In her June 2013 speech, she also commented on relations between US and Russia, saying she wished she could “continue to build a more positive relationship with Russia.” She added, however, that Putin had rejected a number of her attempts to work together “out of hand,” while Dmitry Medvedev, “who was president in name but was obviously beholden to Putin,” was more willing to cooperate when he was in office.
“We would like to see Putin be less defensive toward a relationship with the United States so that we could work together on some issues,” Clinton said.
‘Great’ relations with bankers
In an October 2013 speech, the presidential nominee commented on her relations with bankers, stating they were “great” when she worked with Wall Street as a New York senator.
Clinton, however, chided the big banks for not doing enough to hype economic growth and said that there has to be a balance in how much banks are regulated.
“Right now, there are so many places in our country where the banks are not doing what they need to do because they’re scared of regulations, they’re scared of the other shoe dropping, they’re just plain scared, so credit is not flowing the way it needs to restart economic growth,” she said, adding that “there’s nothing magic about regulations, too much is bad, too little is bad.”
Clinton also said that people should understand how Wall Street works and what impact it has on the global state of affairs. In order to do it she said that “more thought has to be given to the process and transactions and regulations so that we don’t kill or maim what works, but we concentrate on the most effective way of moving forward with the brainpower and the financial power that exists here [on Wall Street].”
Hillary’s alleged cozy relations with Wall Street have repeatedly fallen under fire during the US presidential race, with her Democratic rival and now-supporter Bernie Sanders urging Clinton to release transcripts. She has in turn promised to make them public if the Republican candidate Donald Trump releases his tax returns.
— RT America (@RT_America) October 15, 2016
‘Obstructionist senators should get out’
Regarding the operation of the US Senate, Clinton called for eliminating the filibuster rules which make a 60-vote threshold necessary to pass most proposals rather than a 51-vote majority. She claimed “we need to change the rules in the Senate” as “it’s only gotten more difficult to do anything.”
“Policies deserve a vote up or down. And I don’t think that a small handful of senators should stand in the way of that, because, you know, a lot of those senators are really obstructionist. They should get out,” she said boldly.
In another speech, Clinton commented on the presidency of Barack Obama, dismissing the idea that he could have been able to do more in the US if he sided with Republicans in Congress more often.
“I know that he spent a lot of time early on in the first term with the Republicans in trying, as you recall […] It turned out that the Republicans’ side, particularly in the House, couldn’t deliver,” she said.
Clinton apology tour: ‘I had grown men cry’
In one transcript, Clinton also spoke of the State Department information leaks by Chelsea Manning published by WikiLeaks back in 2010, when she had to go on what she branded a ‘Clinton Apology Tour’ to calm world leaders who felt insulted by them.
“So out come hundreds of thousands of documents. And I have to go on an apology tour. And I had a jacket made like a rock star tour. The Clinton Apology Tour […] It was painful,” Clinton said.
“Leaders who shall remain nameless, who were characterized as vain, egotistical, power hungry, corrupt. And we knew they were. This was not fiction. And I had to go and say, you know, our ambassadors, they get carried away, they want to all be literary people. They go off on tangents. What can I say? I had grown men cry. I mean, literally,” Clinton said at the Innovators’ Summit in Arizona.
The remarks Clinton made in the three Goldman Sachs speeches are not out of step with her public remarks on the same issues at the time. But, as the hacked Podesta emails show, Clinton’s campaign was worried about them nonetheless as they appeared somewhat more straightforward in style: some sections of these speeches had even been highlighted by Clinton’s staff as something that in their view could compromise the presidential candidate if ever they were published.
Clinton’s campaign has so far declined to verify the leaked emails. Goldman Sachs did not immediately provide any comment on Saturday, Reuters reported. But the releases, coming out daily for the last week, even though revealing her views and actions before the presidential campaign started, have been a big challenge for Clinton’s team, as her aides have been forced to constantly comment on the newly-emerging leaks with the elections quickly approaching.
Goldman Sachs paid speeches
The 3 (I misspoke about 5 earlier) speeches to Goldman are attached with some parts highlighted.
Below are some of the more noteworthy quotes. Here is the Politico story Mandy was referencing earlier http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2013/12/wall-street-white-house-republicans-lament-of-the-plutocrats-101047
*Clinton Said, With Dodd-Frank, There Was “A Need To Do Something Because For Political Reasons” Because Members Of Congress “Can’t Sit Idly By And Do Nothing.” *
“And with political people, again, I would say the same thing, you know, there was a lot of complaining about Dodd-Frank, but there was also a need to do something because for political reasons, if you were an elected member of Congress and people in your constituency were losing jobs and shutting businesses and everybody in the press is saying it’s all the fault of Wall Street, you can’t sit idly by and do nothing, but what you do is really important.” [GS2, 10/24/13]
*Tim O’Neill Told Clinton “We Really Did Appreciate It” When She Had Been “Courageous In Some Respects To Associated With Wall Street And This Environment.”
*“MR. O’NEILL: By the way, we really did appreciate when you were the senator from New York and your continued involvement in the issues (inaudible) to be courageous in some respects to associated with Wall Street and this environment. Thank you very much.
Well, I don’t feel particularly courageous. I mean, if we’re going to be an effective, efficient economy, we need to have all part of that engine running well, and that includes Wall Street and Main Street. And there’s a big disconnect and a lot of confusion right now. So I’m not interested in, you know, turning the clock back or pointing fingers, but I am interested in trying to figure out how we come together to chart a better way forward and one that will restore confidence in, you know, small and medium-size businesses and consumers and begin to chip away at the unemployment rate. So it’s something that I, you know, if you’re a realist, you know that people have different roles to play in politics, economics, and this is an important role, but I do think that there has to be an understanding of how what happens here on Wall Street has such broad consequences not just for the domestic but the global economy, so more thought has to be given to the process and transactions and regulations so that we don’t kill or maim what works, but we concentrate on the most effective way of moving forward with the brainpower and the financial power that exists here.” [GS2, 10/24/13] (Hillary is just winging it all the way through with nothing but blather.)
*Speaking About Financial Regulations, Clinton Said “The People That Know The Industry Better Than Anybody Are The People Who Work In The Industry.”
“There’s nothing magic about regulations, too much is bad, too little is bad. How do you get to the golden key, how do we figure out what works? And the people that know the industry better than anybody are the people who work in the industry.” [GS2, 10/24/13] (Just blather)
*Clinton Said “I Represented All Of You For Eight Years. I Had Great Relations And Worked So Close Together After 9/11 To Rebuild Downtown.” *
“I represented all of you for eight years. I had great relations and worked so close together after 9/11 to rebuild downtown, and a lot of respect for the work you do and the people who do it, but I do — I think that when we talk about the regulators and the politicians, the economic consequences of bad decisions back in ’08, you know, were devastating, and they had repercussions throughout the world.” [GS2, 10/24/13]
*Clinton Said “Banks Are Not Doing What They Need To Do Because They’re Scared Of Regulations, They’re Scared Of The Other Shoe Dropping.” *
“I mean, right now, there are so many places in our country where the banks are not doing what they need to do because they’re scared of regulations, they’re scared of the other shoe dropping, they’re just plain scared, so credit is not flowing the way it needs to to restart economic growth. So people are, you know, a little — they’re still uncertain, and they’re uncertain both because they don’t know what might come next in terms of regulations, but they’re also uncertain because of changes in a global economy that we’re only beginning to take hold of.” [GS2, 10/24/13]
(End of RT article)
Commentary: It is clear that Hillary Clinton knows nothing about Wall Street, banking, finance or anything else dealing with overseeing and working effectively with America’s rogue financial sector. She is just filling the air with useless blather that has no effective purpose or impact. And she is not decisive as to her role in speaking to this financial audience—-she continuously inserts nervous oral pauses—-“you know,” “you know” because she has no confidence in what she is saying. It is likely that she has always played an obedient role in dealing with this crowd.
Dot #12: Hillary’s Involvement With Globalist Agent Provocateur and Public Enemy No. 1—-George Soros
Rarely does the world get a true look inside the corrupt world of Western oligarchs and the brazen manipulations they use to enhance their fortunes at the expense of the public good. The following comes from correspondence of the Hungarian-born billionaire, now naturalized American speculator, George Soros. The hacker group CyberBerkut has published online letters allegedly written by Soros that reveal him not only as puppet master of the US-backed Ukraine regime. They also reveal his machinations with the US Government and the officials of the European Union in a scheme where, if he succeeds, he could win billions in the plunder of Ukraine assets. All, of course, would be at the expense of Ukrainian citizens and of EU taxpayers.
What the three hacked documents reveal is a degree of behind-the-scene manipulation of the most minute details of the Kiev regime by the New York billionaire.
In the longest memo, dated March 15, 2015 and marked “Confidential” Soros outlines a detailed map of actions for the Ukraine regime. Titled, “A short and medium term comprehensive strategy for the new Ukraine,” the memo from Soros calls for steps to “restore the fighting capacity of Ukraine without violating the Minsk agreement.” To do the restoring, Soros blithely notes that “General Wesley Clark, Polish General Skrzypczak and a few specialists under the auspices of the Atlantic Council [emphasis added—f.w.e.] will advise President Poroshenko how to restore the fighting capacity of Ukraine without violating the Minsk agreement.”
Soros also calls for supplying lethal arms to Ukraine and secretly training Ukrainian army personnel in Romania to avoid direct NATO presence in Ukraine. The Atlantic Council is a leading Washington pro-NATO think tank.
Notably, Wesley Clark is also a business associate of Soros in BNK Petroleum which does business in Poland.
Clark, some might recall, was the mentally-unstable NATO General in charge of the 1999 bombing of Serbia who ordered NATO soldiers to fire on Russian soldiers guarding the Pristina International Airport. The Russians were there as a part of an agreed joint NATO–Russia peacekeeping operation supposed to police Kosovo. The British Commander, General Mike Jackson refused Clark, retorting, “I’m not going to start the Third World War for you.” Now Clark apparently decided to come out of retirement for the chance to go at Russia directly.
Naked asset grab
In his March 2015 memo Soros further writes that Ukrainian President Poroshenko’s “first priority must be to regain control of financial markets,” which he assures Poroshenko that Soros would be ready to assist in: “I am ready to call Jack Lew of the US Treasury to sound him out about the swap agreement.”
He also calls on the EU to give Ukraine an annual aid sum of €11 billion via a special EU borrowing facility. Soros proposes in effect using the EU’s “AAA” top credit rating to provide a risk insurance for investment into Ukraine.
Whose risk would the EU insure?
Soros details, “I am prepared to invest up to €1 billion in Ukrainian businesses. This is likely to attract the interest of the investment community. As stated above, Ukraine must become an attractive investment destination.” Not to leave any doubt, Soros continues, “The investments will be for-profit but I will pledge to contribute the profits to my foundations. This should allay suspicions that I am advocating policies in search of personal gain. “
For anyone familiar with the history of the Soros Open Society Foundations in Eastern Europe and around the world since the late 1980’s, will know that his supposedly philanthropic “democracy-building” projects in Poland, Russia, or Ukraine in the 1990’s allowed Soros the businessman to literally plunder the former communist countries using Harvard University’s “shock therapy” messiah, and Soros associate, Jeffrey Sachs, to convince the post-Soviet governments to privatize and open to a “free market” at once, rather than gradually.
The example of Soros in Liberia is instructive for understanding the seemingly seamless interplay between Soros the shrewd businessman and Soros the philanthropist. In West Africa George Soros backed a former Open Society employee of his, Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, giving her international publicity and through his influence, even arranging a Nobel Peace Prize for her in 2011, insuring her election as president. Before her presidency she had been well-indoctrinated into the Western free market game, studying economics at Harvard and working for the US-controlled World Bank in Washington and the Rockefeller Citibank in Nairobi. Before becoming Liberia’s President, she worked for Soros directly as chair of his Open Society Initiative for West Africa (OSIWA).
Once in office, President Sirleaf opened the doors for Soros to take over major Liberian gold and base metals assets along with his partner, Nathaniel Rothschild. One of her first acts as President was to also invite the Pentagon’s new Africa Command, AFRICOM, into Liberia whose purpose as a Liberian investigation revealed, was to “protect George Soros and Rothschild mining operations in West Africa rather than champion stability and human rights.”
Naftogaz the target
The Soros memo makes clear he has his eyes on the Ukrainian state gas and energy monopoly, Naftogaz. He writes, “The centerpiece of economic reforms will be the reorganization of Naftogaz and the introduction of market pricing for all forms of energy, replacing hidden subsidies…”
In an earlier letter Soros wrote in December 2014 to both President Poroshenko and Prime Minister Yatsenyuk, Soros openly called for his Shock Therapy: “I want to appeal to you to unite behind the reformers in your government and give your wholehearted support to a radical, ‘big bang’ type of approach. That is to say, administrative controls would be removed and the economy would move to market prices rapidly rather than gradually…Naftogaz needs to be reorganized with a big bang replacing the hidden subsidies…”
Splitting Naftogaz into separate companies could allow Soros to take control of one of the new branches and essentially privatize its profits. He already suggested that he indirectly brought in US consulting company, McKinsey, to advise Naftogaz on the privatization “big bang.”
The totality of what is revealed in the three hacked documents show that Soros is effectively the puppet-master pulling most of the strings in Kiev. Soros Foundation’s Ukraine branch, International Renaissance Foundation (IRF) has been involved in Ukraine since 1989. His IRF doled out more than $100 million to Ukrainian NGOs two years before the fall of the Soviet Union, creating the preconditions for Ukraine’s independence from Russia in 1991. Soros also admitted to financing the 2013-2014 Maidan Square protests that brought the current government into power.
Soros’ foundations were also deeply involved in the 2004 Orange Revolution that brought the corrupt but pro-NATO Viktor Yushchenko into power with his American wife who had been in the US State Department. In 2004 just weeks after Soros’ International Renaissance Foundation had succeeded in getting Viktor Yushchenko as President of Ukraine, Michael McFaul wrote an OpEd for the Washington Post. McFaul, a specialist in organizing color revolutions, who later became US Ambassador to Russia, revealed:
Did Americans meddle in the internal affairs of Ukraine? Yes. The American agents of influence would prefer different language to describe their activities — democratic assistance, democracy promotion, civil society support, etc. — but their work, however labeled, seeks to influence political change in Ukraine. The U.S. Agency for International Development, the National Endowment for Democracy and a few other foundations sponsored certain U.S. organizations, including Freedom House, the International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute, the Solidarity Center, the Eurasia Foundation, Internews and several others to provide small grants and technical assistance to Ukrainian civil society. The European Union, individual European countries and the Soros-funded International Renaissance Foundation did the same.
Soros shapes ‘New Ukraine’
Today the CyberBerkut hacked papers show that Soros’ IRF money is behind creation of a National Reform Council, a body organized by presidential decree from Poroshenko which allows the Ukrainian president to push bills through Ukraine’s legislature. Soros writes, “The framework for bringing the various branches of government together has also emerged. The National Reform Council (NRC) brings together the presidential administration, the cabinet of ministers, the Rada and its committees and civil society. The International Renaissance Foundation which is the Ukrainian branch of the Soros Foundations was the sole financial supporter of the NRC until now…”
Soros’ NRC in effect is the vehicle to allow the President to override parliamentary debate to push through “reforms,” with the declared first priority being privatization of Naftogaz and raising gas prices drastically to Ukrainian industry and households, something the bankrupt country can hardly afford.
In his letter to Poroshenko and Yatsenyuk, Soros hints that he played a key role in selection of three key non-Ukrainian ministers—Natalia Jaresko, an American ex- State Department official as Finance Minister; Aivras Abromavicius of Lithuania as Economics Minister, and a health minister from Georgia. Soros in his December 2014 letter, referring to his proposal for a “big bank” privatization of Naftogaz and price rise, states, “You are fortunate to have appointed three ‘new Ukrainian’ ministers and several natives (sic) who are committed to this approach.”
Elsewhere Soros speaks about de facto creating the impression within the EU that the current government of Yatsenyuk is finally cleaning out the notorious corruption that has dominated every Kiev regime since 1991. Creating that temporary reform illusion, he remarks, will convince the EU to cough up the €11 billion annual investment insurance fund. His March 2015 paper says that, “It is essential for the government to produce a visible demonstration (sic) during the next three months in order to change the widely prevailing image of Ukraine as an utterly corrupt country.” That he states will open the EU to make the €11 billion insurance guarantee investment fund.
While saying that it is important to show Ukraine as a country that is not corrupt, Soros reveals he has little concern when transparency and proper procedures block his agenda. Talking about his proposals to reform Ukraine’s constitution to enable privatizations and other Soros-friendly moves, he complains, “The process has been slowed down by the insistence of the newly elected Rada on proper procedures and total transparency.”
Soros suggests that he intends to create this “visible demonstration” through his initiatives, such as using the Soros-funded National Reform Council, a body organized by presidential decree which allows the Ukrainian president to push bills through Ukraine’s legislature.
George Soros is also using his new European Council on Foreign Relations think-tank to lobby his Ukraine strategy, with his council members such as Alexander Graf Lambsdorff or Joschka Fischer or Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, not to mention former ECB head, Jean-Claude Trichet no doubt laying a subtle role.
George Soros, now 84, was born in Hungary as a Jew, George Sorosz. Soros once boasted in a TV interview that he posed during the war as a gentile with forged papers, assisting the Horthy government to seize property of other Hungarian Jews who were being shipped to the Nazi death camps. Soros told the TV moderator, “There was no sense that I shouldn’t be there, because that was–well, actually, in a funny way, it’s just like in markets–that if I weren’t there–of course, I wasn’t doing it, but somebody else would.”
This is the same morality apparently behind Soros’ activities in Ukraine today. It seems again to matter not to him that the Ukrainian government he helped bring to power in February 2014 US coup d’etat is riddled with explicit anti-semites and self-proclaimed neo-Nazis from the Svoboda Party and Pravy Sektor. George Soros is clearly a devotee of “public-private-partnership.” Only here the public gets fleeced to enrich private investors like Mr. Soros and friends. Cynically, Soros signs his Ukraine strategy memo, “George Soros–A self-appointed advocate of the new Ukraine, March 12, 2015.”
F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.
Dot #13: Hillary Works For The Globalists—-WikiLeaks Reveals George Soros Giving Orders To U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton
George Soros was Hacked! — Thousands of Files Expose Election Manipulation & More
August 15, 2016 13 Comments
All the data was posted online by the group claiming responsibility for the hack, DC Leaks. Saturday’s data dump includes hundreds of internal documents from multiple departments of Soros’ groups, predominantly the Open Society Foundations.
Somebody hacked Soros. His critics will be busy today. This doc alone shows Soros’s anti-Israel network | http://t.co/xZ9TFslK0o
— Mike Doran (@Doranimated) August 14, 2016
DC Leaks claims to be the work of American activists who want to present the truth about the “US decision-making process as well as about the key elements of American political life.” The group’s website claims to be “launched by the American hacktivists who respect and appreciate freedom of speech, human rights and government of the people.”
US security experts, however, are blaming the leak on Russian hackers, according to Bloomberg, in a similar reaction seen in the wake of the DNC leaks.
Security experts now say that site, DCLeaks.com, with its spiffy capitol-dome logo, shows the marks of the same Russian intelligence outfit that targeted the Democratic political organizations, reads the report.
This move by the US to blame the Russians is a predictable one as the previous leak posted by the group exposed private emails of the US general formerly in charge of NATO and his deliberate attempt to provoke conflict with Russia.
Soros’ Open Society Foundations provides funding to the International Consortium for Investigative Journalists, which came under the spotlight earlier this year after the release of the Panama Papers, which included millions of records from law firm Mossack Fonseca showing how the wealthy are using tax havens, according to a report by RT.
The Panama Papers leak came under criticism from WikiLeaks, who claimed the US government and Soros funded the project to attack Russia and President Vladimir Putin.
The site is not searchable, so it is difficult to look for key terms. However, some gems are already beginning to surface. For example, a group has shared a Full list of Soros NGOs manipulating elections in all EU member states.
— ⚓ Cain Raiser (@ActaNonVerba_) August 14, 2016
Another file shows Soros’ plans to counter Russian policy and traditional values. In the proposal, we can see a $500,000 budget request for an Open Society program designed to counter Russian influence among European democracies.
As the files are searched, there will undoubtedly be even more unscrupulous details to unfold as Soros is anything but ethical. As the Free Thought Project previously reported last week, a WikiLeaks email showed his direct control over Hillary Clinton.
Found within the WikiLeaks’ Hillary Clinton email archive is an email with the subject ‘Unrest in Albania,’ in which Soros makes clear to Clinton that “two things need to be done urgently.” He then directs the Secretary of State to “bring the full weight of the international community to bear on Prime Minister Berisha” and “appoint a senior European official as mediator.” Revealing the influence he wields within the corridors of power, Soros then provides Secretary of State Clinton with three names from which to choose. Unsurprisingly, Clinton acquiesced and chose one of the officials recommended by Soros — Miroslav Lajcak.
Spearheaded by WikiLeaks a decade ago, the means of ‘ruler’ accountability is now forever changed. No longer does the public have to sit back and be spoon fed the lies and half truths from their televisions. In today’s computer age, the oligarchs are finding it hard to maintain their innocence thanks to the heroic actions of hackers. Bit by logical bit their masks are being pulled back and their criminal influence is exposed.
(End of Free Thought Project article)
(Commentary: Contrary to even alternative media accounts of George Soros, which portray him as a free-lance eccentric socialist billionaire, all you have to do is ask one question, namely, is George Soros working to accelerate the “controlled disintegration” of the 28-nation-states of the European Union and accelerate the “controlled disintegration” of America? The answer is a resounding “YES.” Accordingly, it is not a stretch to re-assess George Soros as one of the very top minions of the clique of foreign banking families of the City of London. He masterminded the mass migration that has done incalculable damage to the nation-states of the EU and he is trying very hard to destabilize America’s social order and, therefore, should be permanently expelled with a price on his head, just as Putin did, as well as collapse all the Soros NGOs embedded throughout America. But Obama and Hillary Clinton would block this action because they both are receiving money and orders from Soros to accelerate the controlled disintegration of America and its economy. In other words, the clique of foreign banking families in the City of London are engineering the global controlled disintegration plan and George Soros is leading that initiative. Obama and Hillary Clinton are clique minions answering to George Soros who is a senior clique minion. This arrangement explains why the communication from Soros to U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is clearly an ORDER, not a request or a consultation.)
Dot #14: It Is Transparently Clear That Hillary Works For The Globalists, She’s Subordinate To George Soros, and Is Acting As An Enabler Of Soros’ Many Globalist Schemes To Further The Controlled Disintegration America’s Social and Economic Structure To Hasten Our Surrender To The Globalist One-World Government Fantasy
Make Soros Happy’ — Leaked Email Exposes Clinton Campaign’s Yearning to Gratify Corrupt Billionaire
Greg Speed, president of the Soros-funded organization America Votes, wrote an email to aide Huma Abedin to extend an invitation “for Secretary Clinton to join us at an evening reception at the home of George Soros in December. We would be thrilled to have her serve as honored guest and speaker at this gathering of our top supporters honoring America Votes’ work over the past 10 years and looking forward to the next decade.”
Abedin, seemingly unsure about the invitation, forwards the email message to Clinton campaign strategist and manager Robby Mook, asking,
Mook tellingly replies:
“I would only do this for political reasons (ie to make Soros happy) It’s very unclear to me how much AV will matter next cycle. And I haven’t seen then adding any value this cycle. I also worry a little it will cause donor confusion vis a vis Priorities.”
America Votes, which works “with over 400 state and national partner organizations to advance progressive policies, win elections, and protect every American’s right to vote,” and has received millions from Soros, describes itself as “the common link between many of the largest and most influential issue and membership organizations in the country. Our work has brought together a wide range of causes and built a unified coalition that has transformed how the progressive community works. Together, we have engaged communities across the country to take action on critical issues – from fighting for working families, to advancing women’s healthcare, to protecting the environment and more – and mobilized millions of voters to turn out on Election Day.”
As the Free Thought Project has reported at length, many documents from Wikileaks’ files show the cozy relationship between Clinton — as well as campaign insiders — and Soros.
Soros has been previously exposed as pulling powerful strings behind Clinton and her campaign in previous document caches revealed by Wikileaks and on the site, DCLeaks.
From hopes of capitalizing on police violence against minorities to implement, in essence, federalized policing in the U.S. and attempts to influence the Supreme Court on immigration, to plans of manipulating journalists over the refugee crisis and demands the Clinton Foundation align the U.S. and European Union on policy, Soros seems to have his hands in nearly every imaginable pocket — most particularly that of Hillary Clinton, herself.
Hillary’s alleged cozy relations with Wall Street have repeatedly fallen under fire during the US presidential race, with her Democratic rival and now-supporter Bernie Sanders urging Clinton to release transcripts. She has in turn promised to make them public if the Republican candidate Donald Trump releases his tax returns.
(End of Free Thought article)
Dot #15: Hillary Works For The Globalists—-George Soros’ Scheme To Centralize Control of Local Enforcement At The Federal Level, In All Likelihood, Within The US Department of Homeland Security
Leaked Soros Memo Reveals Potential Plan to Use Black Lives Matter to Federalize US Police
August 31, 2016
The document shows that OSF saw the killings of Mike Brown, Eric Garner, Walter Scott, and Freddie Gray as an opportunity to implement this mission of federal police guidelines. OSF, according to the documents, then held a meeting titled, “Police Reform: How to Take Advantage of the Crisis of the Moment and Drive Long-Term Institutional Change in Police-Community Practice.”
The memo further documents that Soros-financed groups and personalities influenced a Task Force on 21st Century Policing, created by President Obama. Last may, the task force released a final report consisting of 60 recommendations recommending protocol to local departments on how to modify policing practices.
The information is from a 61-page report of an Open Society U.S. Programs Board Meeting that took place in New York City in May of last year.
States the board meeting document:
The federal government is seeking philanthropic support for a number of its initiatives. In addition to seeking support to advance the implementation of the recommendations of the Presidential Taskforce, the White House recently launched the Policing Data Initiative to explore how best to use data and technology to build trust, voice, and solutions to improve community policing. The Department of Justice recently selected the first six cities to host pilot sites for the National Initiative for Building Community Trust and Justice, which was launched last fall to help repair and strengthen the relationship between law enforcement and the communities they serve by exploring strategies intended to enhance procedural justice, reduce implicit bias, and support racial reconciliation.
We are gaining a better understanding of these efforts in order to determine how best USP can use this moment to create a national movement. We have already had a set of preliminary conversations with about a dozen key stakeholders and will undertake a field scan to map the areas of work currently underway to advance police reform, including an assessment of the redundancies and gaps in work, and opportunities for collaboration. As we proceed, we will engage the funder network we helped to establish, the Executive Alliance on Men and Boys of Color, which now includes forty foundations.
U.S. Programs (USP) is a part of OSF with the stated mission of working to further a vibrant democratic society in which all people can meaningfully participate in its civic, economic, and political life.
According to the above excerpt, USP was thinking of ways to capitalize on police killings to ‘create a national movement’ to implement their agenda.
The think tank also raises the question of how to properly steer the ostensible ‘grassroots’ organizations, such as Black Lives Matter, to achieve USP goals.
The events of the past several months have understandably led to a wide range of activities, including a variety of advocacy efforts, to respond to the significant challenges in policing that have been exposed and the opportunity to promote meaningful and lasting change. For example, organized under the banner of the Civil Rights Coalition on Police Reform, organizations like the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under the Law, LCCHR, and LDF are advocating for federal reform efforts with a particular emphasis on data collection and transparency and, as noted above, 35 effecting federal funding streams. A variety of other national advocacy organizations, including grantees Advancement Project, PolicyLink, the Center for Popular Democracy and the ACLU are working to provide advocates with toolkits and resources to help their organizing efforts. Locally based groups such as the Ohio Student Association, the Organization for Black Struggle, the Asian Law Caucus, and the ACLU of New Jersey, to name a few, are advocating for specific reforms at the city and state levels. Another layer of grassroots and youth-oriented groups like Freedom Side, Ferguson Action, Black Lives Matter and Million Hoodies Movement for Justice are also advocating for specific reforms. The range of efforts underway raises a number of questions and concerns about capacity, the need for coordination and the appropriate prioritization of policy objectives, among others, which we will discuss in the policing portion of the meeting.
While the intentions of reforming police in America seem noble, the very idea of a Soros-led initiative is chilling.
Another memo, leaked earlier this month, showed the billionaire was potentially funding the Black Lives Matter movement, to the tune of $650,000. Now, as today’s memo shows, we know why.
Earlier this month, in an email found within the WikiLeaks’ Hillary Clinton archive, with the subject ‘Unrest in Albania,’ Soros makes clear to Clinton that “two things need to be done urgently.” He then directs the Secretary of State to “bring the full weight of the international community to bear on Prime Minister Berisha” and “appoint a senior European official as mediator.” Revealing the influence he wields within the corridors of power, Soros then provides Secretary of State Clinton with three names from which to choose. Unsurprisingly, Clinton acquiesced and chose one of the officials recommended by Soros — Miroslav Lajcak.
Soros-affiliated organizations are deeply connected to numerous color revolutions, such as the Arab Spring, and a number of other uprisings across the world. They have been intimately involved in the coup that took place in Ukraine, and subsequent ratcheting up of Cold War tensions with Russia.
As these leaked memos and emails prove, the United States is nothing more than one of Soros’ pawns.
While Americans remain oblivious and argue over straw men fed to them by the mainstream media, the police state is growing — both here and abroad. As the citizens are promised ‘reform’ the only thing that actually changes are the puppets in marble buildings.
(end of Free Thought article)
Dot #16: Hillary Works For The Globalists—-George Soros Is Being Permitted To Be The Wrecking Ball Of America’s Democracy. Why?
Soros-Linked Voting Machines Cause Concern Over Rigged Election
October 24, 2016
By Joseph Jankowski
A U.K. based company that has provided voting machines for 16 states, including important battleground states like Florida and Arizona, has direct ties with billionaire leftist and Clinton crusader George Soros.
With recent WikiLeaks emails showing that Hillary Clinton received foreign policy directives and coordinated on domestic policy with Soros, along with receiving tens of millions of dollars in presidential campaign support from the billionaire, concerns are growing that these shadowy players may pull the strings behind the curtains of the upcoming presidential election.
As Lifezette reports, the fact that the man in control of voting machines in 16 states is tied directly to the man who has given millions of dollars to the Clinton campaign and various progressive and globalist causes will surely leave a bad taste in the mouth of many a voter.
The balloting equipment tied to Soros is coming from the U.K. based Smartmatic company, whose chairman Mark Malloch-Brown is a former UN official and sits on the board of Soros’ Open Society Foundation.
According to Lifezette, Malloch-Brown was part of the Soros Advisory Committee on Bosnia and also is a member of the executive committee of the International Crisis Group, an organization he co-founded in the 1990s and built with funds from George Soros’ personal fortune.
In 2007 Soros appointed Malloch-Brown vice-president of his Quantum Funds, vice-chairman of Soros Fund Management, and vice-chairman of the Open Society Institute (former name of OSF).
Browns ties also intertwine with the Clintons as he was a partner with Sawyer-Miller, the consulting firm where close Clinton associate Mandy Grunwald worked. Brown was also a senior advisor to FTI Consulting, a firm at which Jackson Dunn, who spent 15 years working as an aide to the Clintons, is a senior managing director.
When taking that into account, along with the poor track record Smartmatic has of providing free and fair elections, this all becomes quite terrifying.
An astonishing 2006 classified U.S. diplomatic cable obtained and released by WikiLeaks reveals the extent to which Smartmatic may have played a hand in rigging the 2004 Venezuelan recall election under a section titled “A Shadow of Fraud.” The memo stated that:
“Smartmatic Corporation is a riddle both in ownership and operation, complicated by the fact that its machines have overseen several landslide (and contested) victories by President Hugo Chavez and his supporters.”
“The Smartmatic machines used in Venezuela are widely suspected of, though never proven conclusively to be, susceptible to fraud,” the memo continued. “The Venezuelan opposition is convinced that the Smartmatic machines robbed them of victory in the August 2004 referendum. Since then, there have been at least eight statistical analyses performed on the referendum results.”
“One study obtained the data log from the CANTV network and supposedly proved that the Smartmatic machines were bi-directional and in fact showed irregularities in how they reported their results to the CNE central server during the referendum,” it read.
With such suspicion and a study which claims to prove that the U.K. firm’s equipment tampered with the 2004 Venezuelan recall election, should be enough for states to reject these machines if they desire a fair election.
Smartmatic is providing machines to Arizona, California, Colorado, Washington DC, Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, Nevada, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin, which means these Soros and Clinton linked machines are going to take the votes of thousands of Americans.
While GOP nominee Donald Trump has been voicing his opinion that the elections are indeed rigged due to media bias, and the proof that mainstream polls are heavily weighted to favor Clinton, it is needless to say that if the results show Hillary as a winner in November, there is going to a mess to shuffle through to find signs of honesty.
Dot #17: Hillary Works For The Globalists—-The Rigged 2016 Democratic Primary, the Rigged Mainstream Media, Rigged Hillary Violent Protestors, Rigged Voting Machines, And Now, Rigged Polls
New Podesta Email Exposes Playbook For Rigging Polls Through “Oversamples”
Earlier this morning we wrote about the obvious sampling bias in the latest ABC / Washington Post poll that showed a 12-point national advantage for Hillary. Like many of the recent polls from Reuters, ABC and The Washington Post, this latest poll included a 9-point sampling bias toward registered democrats.
“METHODOLOGY – This ABC News poll was conducted by landline and cellular telephone Oct. 20-22, 2016, in English and Spanish, among a random national sample of 874 likely voters. Results have a margin of sampling error of 3.5 points, including the design effect. Partisan divisions are 36-27-31 percent, Democrats – Republicans – Independents.”
Of course, while democrats may enjoy a slight registration advantage of a couple of points, it is nowhere near the 9 points reflected in this latest poll.
Meanwhile, we also pointed out that with huge variances in preference across demographics one can easily “rig” a poll by over indexing to one group vs. another. As a quick example, the ABC / WaPo poll found that Hillary enjoys a 79-point advantage over Trump with black voters. Therefore, even a small “oversample” of black voters of 5% could swing the overall poll by 3 full points. Moreover, the pollsters don’t provide data on the demographic mix of their polls which makes it impossible to “fact check” the bias…convenient.
Now, for all of you out there who still aren’t convinced that the polls are “adjusted”, we present to you the following Podesta email, leaked earlier today, that conveniently spells out, in detail, exactly how to “manufacture” the desired data. The email starts out with a request for recommendations on “oversamples for polling” in order to “maximize what we get out of our media polling.”
I also want to get your Atlas folks to recommend oversamples for our polling before we start in February. By market, regions, etc. I want to get this all compiled into one set of recommendations so we can maximize what we get out of our media polling.
The email even includes a handy, 37-page guide with the following poll-rigging recommendations. In Arizona, over sampling of Hispanics and Native Americans is highly recommended:
Research, microtargeting & polling projects
– Over-sample Hispanics
– Use Spanish language interviewing. (Monolingual Spanish-speaking voters are among the lowest turnout Democratic targets)
– Over-sample the Native American population
For Florida, the report recommends “consistently monitoring” samples to makes sure they’re “not too old” and “has enough African American and Hispanic voters.” Meanwhile, “independent” voters in Tampa and Orlando are apparently more dem friendly so the report suggests filling up independent quotas in those cities first.
– Consistently monitor the sample to ensure it is not too old, and that it has enough African American and Hispanic voters to reflect the state.
– On Independents: Tampa and Orlando are better persuasion targets than north or south Florida (check your polls before concluding this). If there are budget questions or oversamples, make sure that Tampa and Orlando are included first.
Meanwhile, it’s suggested that national polls over sample “key districts / regions” and “ethnic” groups “as needed.”
– General election benchmark, 800 sample, with potential over samples in key districts/regions
– Benchmark polling in targeted races, with ethnic over samples as needed
– Targeting tracking polls in key races, with ethnic over samples as needed
And that’s how you manufacture a 12-point lead for your chosen candidate and effectively chill the vote of your opposition.
(End of Zero Hedge article)
Dot #18: Hillary Works For the Globalists—-Taking A Page Out Of The Globalist George Soros Election Fraud Playbook, Hillary, Her Campaign, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, And The Democratic National Committee (DNC) Subverted The 2016 Democratic Primary and Violated The U.S. Constitution
Hillary’s Rigged Primary Victories are Showing the World Presidents are Selected — Not Elected
In 2012, Maricopa County had 200 polling locations open on primary day, but reduced the number of polling stations to only 60 for 2016.
The extreme reduction of polling locations served to create wait times of over 5 hours to cast a ballot; an extreme amount of time that working class citizens often don’t have the luxury of waiting.
Maricopa County Recorder Helen Purcell, who was responsible for the reduction in polling places in 2016, attempted to justify her actions by claiming that voter turnout was traditionally low, so she simply reduced the number of polling locations to save money.
Consider: 2012 primary had 300,000 voters and 200 polling places. 2016 primary has estimated 800,000 voters at 60 polling places. #12News
— JOE DANA (@JoeDanaReports) March 23, 2016
Indicative of something more nefarious afoot, Pima County, home to Tucson, had almost double the number of polling locations open compared to Maricopa County, even though Pima County is only approximately one-third the size.
On top of having far too few polling locations open in general, the lack of stations in densely populated Latino neighborhoods indicate something far more organized, given that almost 41 percent of Phoenix residents are Latino.
“In my district, there is only one polling place,’’ Democratic State Senator Martin Quezada told AZCentral.com. “In my neighboring district, LD 30, there are no polling places.”
“It is no coincidence many poor and predominantly Latino areas didn’t get a polling place,” AZCentral.com editorial columnist Elvia Diaz wrote Tuesday night.
These types of anomalies are seemingly par for the course though when it comes to establishment political elites like Hillary Clinton, which begs the question; are elections being rigged?
A statistical analysis of the 2008 to 2012 vote results revealed that widespread electronic vote rigging taking place, exposing that over 1 million votes were switched from other GOP candidates, to Mitt Romney, during the 2012 GOP presidential primary.
“This substantial effect exceeds reasonable statistical bounds and we calculate that the probability of such election results happening by chance is beyond typical or even extreme,” Francois Choquette, co-author of the analysis said.
Think back to 2008, Clinton was facing upstart candidate Barack Obama, who had just won Iowa and had a commanding lead going into New Hampshire in both pre-election polls, as well as exit polling on election night.
But the final results were dramatically different from the polls, in which every one had Obama winning with an average lead of 8.3 percent, yet Clinton ended up winning by 2.6 percent, somehow unaccountably gaining 10 percentage points over night.
Adding to the suspicion, various pre-election polls had been fairly precise in their predictions for all other candidates in the same race, but had mysteriously miscalled the numbers for Clinton and Obama.
Interestingly, the hand-counted paper ballot results favored Obama, while Clinton won in the districts where electronic voting machines secretly counted ballots.
Clinton: statewide optical scan tally: 52.73 percent
Obama: statewide optical scan tally: 47.27 percent
Clinton: statewide hand-count tally: 46.75 percent
Obama: statewide hand-count tally: 53.25 percent
According to a report featured in Truth-out:
Hillary Clinton’s upset win was imagined by some as a fix perpetrated by rogue elements among her more conservative New Hampshire Democratic backers. Others pointed the finger at Republican operatives who they believe may have orchestrated her victory, judging Obama the stronger horse against Romney (or any other GOP candidate).
As it happens, the Premier Voting Machine company, which controlled over three-quarters of the New Hampshire primary, was actually the same Republican-friendly Diebold Voting Machine Company involved in the controversial upset victory by President George W. Bush over John Kerry in Ohio in 2004. (The company had just switched names.)
Diebold CEO Walden O’Dell, who had publicly pledged to deliver Ohio to Bush in 2004, was later mired in widespread accusations of a conspiracy to rig out Kerry late on election night in Ohio. Top cyber-security experts charged that Karl Rove’s online vote-gathering apparatus used a “man in the middle” hack to alter the results, in collusion with the ultra partisan Ohio secretary of state, Kenneth Blackwell, the co-chair of the Committee to Re-Elect George W. Bush.The man who built the vote-tabulating system, GOP tech guru Michael Connell, died in a suspicious private plane crash after being subpoenaed and then compelled to testify against Rove. Two election officials were eventually convicted of rigging the Ohio recount.
Programming the counting for the 2008 New Hampshire primary was a little known company called LHS Associates, which used the same infamous GEMS software long proven to be easily manipulated by insiders to alter the outcome of the election and produce a matching, fraudulent poll tape report.
With such entrenched political elites working to game the system, is there actually any hope that our elections are representative?
Sadly, the answer is no.
Even after being made aware of the vulnerabilities of the voting machines, by computer expert Harri Hursti, prior to the 2008 NH primary, the New Hampshire State House Subcommittee on Election Equipment chose to continue to use the easily tampered with software.
Over the course of this election cycle, one thing has become apparent; the political elite and the party bosses are the ones that select the President of the United States, citizen voting is simply a formality to provide legitimacy to the ruling elite.
Presidents are selected, not elected. – Franklin Delano Roosevelt
Dot #19: Hillary, An Embedded Globalist Minion Acknowledging She Receives Instructions From the Globalist Command Network, The Council on Foreign Relations In New York and In Washington, DC
Who is Hillary Clinton Speaking To In This Video? She Is speaking to members of the Council on Foreign Relations, the globalist headquarters in New York and Washington, DC that takes its orders from the globalists’ world headquarters in the City of London. Why is America’s U.S. Secretary of State appearing at the Council of Foreign Relations and why is she acknowledging that she receives policy instructions from them?
You have now been presented 19 dots—-most based on recent WikiLeaks disclosures—-to try to connect and make sense out of Hillary Clinton and help you predict what her actions will be if she becomes the President of the United States of America, and, most important, her impact on America under her term of office, whether it be four years or eight years, or longer.
You are now in an ideal position to go down the deepest of deep rabbit holes with me to mull over the possibility that there is an alternative explanation of “how the world actually works and who, specifically, is pulling the stings from the top.” The “mainstream media” has always been there to prevent you from using your critical thinking to form your own unique personal perspective that might better explain why America appears to be on its last legs, how it happened, and what we can do about it.
But, first a warning:
We Americans have been “trained” to immediately reject any and all explanations that do not conform with the endless false narratives presented to us from the domestic and international “mainstream media” and reinforced by the coordinated information outlets within American “education” and American “entertainment.” The training we have received has been repetitious, rigorous and centered around the use of the Pavlovian and toxic term “no, no, that’s just a conspiracy theory,” meaning that you will be shamed and shunned if you don’t immediately get back in line with the false media explanation of how the world actually works. Effectively, this programmed response trained into us is meant to shut off the critical thinking of the entire American public to leave us in the dark and disempowered. It is important to know that this mind-game is based on the fallacy that if new explanations we hear about are beyond our current knowledge and beyond our current imaginations, then that explanation automatically must be false.
But, this entire mind-game is preposterous. Why? Because we all know that scientists, inventors, innovators, planners, forward thinkers, futurists, and the like must learn to function and move forward in spheres where new trial explanations are beyond their current knowledge and beyond their current imaginations. And if they automatically shut off their critical thinking, there would be no scientific advances, inventions, innovations, new plans, new understandings, and expanding horizons of critical thinking itself. And why is that? Because there is a natural discovery process that must be pursued by scientists, inventors, innovators, planners, forward thinkers, futurists and the like, who are the spark plugs for the natural evolutionary advance of humankind. Otherwise, the advancement of our societies would be brought to a halt and we would all be back to a feudal existence wherein the State or Church or both would be once again blocking scientific advance and critical thinking as some form of disloyalty or heresy.
And Before We Start, A Quick Reference Check of Background Information:
From 2010 through 2013, I researched and authored A Grandfather’s Encouragement To Our Next Generation, (under his pen name, Robert O’Bannon) in an effort to help American youth and young adults, as well as our next generation across the world, to develop their own perspective of “how the world actually works” in order to maintain control of their destinies as all the world’s populations are roiled by the current social and economic disintegration.
In mid-2016, I completed the sequel, titled: Restoring The Peace, which is the first component to a larger work, titled American National Service: Rebuilding America and Its Economy From the Ground Up.
- The American National Service Website: www.americannationalservice.com
- The file-sharing download link to the two e-books described above: http://spaces.hightail.com/space/elrhN
Now Let’s Head Down The Rabbit Hole Together and I’ll Add Commentary To Ease You Through The Grim Parts And Try To Reinforce Your Critical Thinking
And let’s remember that what you see and read is not meant to be the final word. Instead, it is just a series of reference points which you can accept, reject, or temporarily hold until you can put your own jigsaw puzzle together and form your own unique perspective of how you think the world actually works.
Here We Go
The First Stop As We Descend Will Be The Portal To:
The Council On Foreign Relations
Where We Will Find One Of The Largest Infestation of Globalist Minions Who—Under Instructions of the Top Globalists In The City Of London, Are Carrying Out the Controlled Disintegration of America, the American People, American Sovereignty, American Principles, and Our U.S. Constitution All For The Purpose of Forcing Us Into Their One-World Government Fantasy.
They Have Finally Figured Out That They Are On The Wrong Side Of History and Irrespective Of The Outcome Of The 2016 Presidential Election, They Are Going To Be Subject To Criminal Investigations and Grand Jury Hearings To Determine Their Involvement In Committing Treason Against Their Own Country, in Crimes Against Humanity, in War Crimes, and In Other Extraordinary Criminality.
Then, Those Found Guilty Will Be Rounded Up and Brought To Justice Under Which Many Of Them Will Be Immediately And Permanently Deported and Incarcerated In Solitary Confinement For Life In The Pre-Determined Netherworld Location Described And Pictured Below.
To find the “persons of interest” in the upcoming criminal investigatiions and grand jury hearings, please click on the following link: http://www.cfr.org/about/membership/roster.html?letter=I
Person of Interest: Robert Rubin—-Co-Chairperson
Person of Interest: Carla Hills—-Co-Chairperson
Person of Interest: David Rubinstein—-Vice Chairman
Person of Interest: Richard Haass—-President
Council On Foreign Relations
23 July 2009
Written by James Perloff
During his presidential campaign, Barack Obama consistently promised Americans “change.” Such promises aren’t new to the voting public.
When Jimmy Carter ran for president, he said:
“The people of this country know from bitter experience that we are not going to get … changes merely by shifting around the same group of insiders.” And top Carter aide Hamilton Jordan promised: “If, after the inauguration, you find a Cy Vance as Secretary of State and Zbigniew Brzezinski as head of National Security, then I would say we failed. And I’d quit.” Yet Carter selected Vance as Secretary of State and Brzezinski as National Security Adviser; the “same group of insiders” had been shifted around; and Jordan did not quit.
Carter’s administration was dominated by members of the Trilateral Commission, which had been founded by Brzezinski and David Rockefeller. In 1980, when Ronald Reagan was campaigning against Carter, he protested:
I don’t believe that the Trilateral Commission is a conspiratorial group, but I do think its interests are devoted to international banking, multinational corporations, and so forth. I don’t think that any Administration of the U.S. Government should have the top nineteen positions filled by people from any one group or organization representing one viewpoint. No, I would go in a different direction.
Yet after his election, President Reagan picked 10 Trilateralists for his transition team, and included in his administration such Trilateralists as Vice President George Bush, Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger, U.S. Trade Representative William Brock, and Fed Chairman Paul Volcker. Yet the entire North American membership of the Trilateral Commission has never numbered much over 100.
The reason that presidential candidates’ promises of “change” go largely unfulfilled once in office: they draw their top personnel from the same establishment groups — of which the Trilateral Commission is only one.
Chief among these groups is the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the most visible manifestation of what some have called the American establishment. Members of the council have dominated the administrations of every president since Franklin D. Roosevelt, at the cabinet and sub-cabinet level. It does not matter whether the president is a Democrat or Republican. As we will later see, Barack Obama is no exception to CFR influence.
Power Behind the Throne
In theory, America’s government is supposed to be “of the people, by the people, for the people.” While this concept rang true in early America, and many individuals still trust in it, the last century has seen the reality of power increasingly shift from the people to an establishment rooted in banking, Wall Street, and powerful multinational corporations. Syndicated columnist Edith Kermit Roosevelt, granddaughter of Teddy Roosevelt, explained:
The word “Establishment” is a general term for the power elite in international finance, business, the professions and government, largely from the northeast, who wield most of the power regardless of who is in the White House. Most people are unaware of the existence of this “legitimate Mafia.” Yet the power of the Establishment makes itself felt from the professor who seeks a foundation grant, to the candidate for a cabinet post or State Department job. It affects the nation’s policies in almost every area.
Roosevelt added that this group’s goal is “a One World Socialist state governed by ‘experts’ like themselves.”
David Rockefeller, the longtime chairman (and now chairman emeritus) of the CFR, acknowledged the role of the establishment in trying to lead America in the one-world direction in his 2002 book Memoirs:
For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as “internationalists” and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.
Two major means the establishment employs for controlling government policy: (1) through its influence within the two major parties and the mass media, it can usually assure that both the Republican and Democratic presidential candidates will be its own hand-picked men; (2) by stacking presidential cabinets with CFR members at key positions — especially those involving defense, finance, foreign policy, and national security — it can assure that America will move in the direction it wants. Since the council’s founding in 1921, 21 secretaries of defense or war, 19 secretaries of the treasury, 17 secretaries of state, and 15 CIA directors have hailed from the Council on Foreign Relations.
Prior to the CFR’s founding, what Congressman Charles Lindbergh, Sr. (the father of the famous aviator) called the “Money Trust” — a cabal of international bankers including the houses of Rockefeller, Morgan, and Rothschild — conspired to create the Federal Reserve System. Their agents, such as Paul Warburg and Benjamin Strong, who had secretly planned the Fed at a nine-day meeting on Jekyll Island, were then put in charge of the system itself. This gave them control of American interest rates, and, by virtue of this, control of the stock market, as well as the capacity to have the U.S. government spend without limit by having the Fed create money from nothing. The result has been decades of inflation and skyrocketing national debt. (For full details, see the April 13, 2009 New American or Our Monetary Mayhem Began With the Fed.)
Not just an accumulation of wealth, but a consolidation of political power was involved. The Money Trust had backed Woodrow Wilson in the presidential elections, and then controlled him through their front man, Edward Mandell House, who lived in the White House. The trust recognized how the power of government could be used to advance their own interests.
Wilson, surrounded by the bankers, traveled to the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, which was settling the aftermath of World War I. His chief proposal there, of course, was the League of Nations — a first step toward world government. However, although the League was established by the Versailles Treaty, the United States did not join because the Senate refused to ratify the treaty.
In response to this rejection, the bankers’ circle, still in Paris, held a series of meetings and proposed to establish a new organization in the United States, whose purpose would be to lead America into the League. This organization was incorporated in New York City two years later as the Council on Foreign Relations.
Architects of a New World Order
The CFR’s goal was formation of an incrementally stronger world government. Admiral Chester Ward, former Judge Advocate of the U.S. Navy, was a CFR member for 16 years before resigning in disgust. He stated:
“The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national independence, and submergence into an all-powerful one-world government.”
After World War II, the League’s successor, the United Nations, was born. Contrary to what the public is commonly told, the UN was not founded by nations who had tired of war. The UN was conceived by a group of CFR members in the State Department calling themselves the Informal Agenda Group. They drafted the original proposal for the UN, and secured the approval of President Roosevelt, who then made establishing the UN his highest postwar priority. When the UN held its founding meeting in San Francisco in 1945, 47 of the American delegates were CFR members.
Though the UN was not initially set up as a world government, the intent was that it would develop into one over time. John Foster Dulles (CFR), an American delegate to the UN founding meeting who later became Secretary of State under Eisenhower, acknowledged as much in his book War or Peace:
“The United Nations represents not a final stage in the development of world order, but only a primitive stage. Therefore its primary task is to create the conditions which will make possible a more highly developed organization.”
Two other postwar institutions, the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, were technically created at the 1944 Bretton Woods Conference. But the initial planning was done by the CFR’s Economic and Finance Group, part of their wartime War and Peace Studies Project. The World Bank and IMF act as a loan-guarantee scheme for multinational banks. When a loan to a foreign country goes awry, the World Bank and IMF step in with taxpayer money, ensuring that the private banks continue to receive interest payments. Furthermore, the World Bank and IMF dictate conditions to the countries receiving bailouts, thus giving the bankers a measure of political control over indebted nations.
Despite what Americans were told, the postwar Marshall Plan was not invented by General George Marshall, though he did announce it in a 1947 Harvard commencement speech. The Marshall Plan was dreamed up at a CFR study group with David Rockefeller as its secretary. Marshall was simply selected to announce the plan because, as a general, he would be perceived as politically neutral and help garner bipartisan congressional support for the plan. Unknown to the public, Marshall Plan funds were circuitously rerouted by John J. McCloy — appointed U.S. High Commissioner to Germany — to Jean Monnet, founder of the Common Market, which evolved into today’s European Union, a microcosm of world government. McCloy returned home to become chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations in 1953.
The tragic Vietnam War was run almost entirely by CFR members. William P. Bundy (CFR) drafted the Tonkin Gulf Resolution before the now-discredited Tonkin Gulf Incident even took place. Bundy’s father-in-law, Dean Acheson (CFR), as leader of a senior team of advisers nicknamed “the Wise Men,” persuaded Lyndon Baines Johnson to dramatically escalate the war beginning in 1965. And Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara (CFR) helped develop the “rules of engagement” (e.g., preventing the Air Force from attacking critical targets) that guaranteed the war’s disastrous prolongation. This generated a huge slide to the left among American college students. When Bundy left the State Department, David Rockefeller appointed him editor of the CFR’s journal Foreign Affairs. And McNamara, one of the leading architects of the Vietnam War debacle, became president of the World Bank.
Broadening the Scheme
The CFR is not a uniquely American phenomenon. It has counterpart organizations throughout the world — e.g., the Royal Institute of International Affairs in England, the French Institute of International Relations, etc.
To help coordinate policy on an international scale, CFR chairman David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski founded the Trilateral Commission in 1973. “Trilateral” refers to the coordination of three global regions: North America, Europe, and Asia. The commission’s meetings allow the gathering together of heads of state, banks, multinational corporations, and media. Republican Senator Barry Goldwater called the commission “David Rockefeller’s newest cabal,” and said, “It is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States.” The commission, like the annual secretive meetings of the Bilderbergers and the notorious Bohemian Grove, enables the international power elite to privately assemble and plan our destiny.
Jimmy Carter was a member of the commission, hand-picked to be president after meeting with Brzezinski and Rockefeller at the latter’s Tarrytown, New York, estate. Carter filled his administration with CFR members and Trilateralists. Indeed, Brzezinski noted in his memoirs that “all the key foreign policy decision makers of the Carter Administration had previously served in the Trilateral Commission.” Carter then embarked on a destructive course of foreign policy that included betraying the Shah of Iran, leading to the installment of Ayatollah Khomeini and the U.S. hostage crisis; betraying President Anastasio Somoza of Nicaragua, resulting in a Marxist dictatorship under the Sandinistas; and betraying Taiwan in order to recognize Communist China — a move previously set up by Richard Nixon’s overtures to China, dictated by his own CFR advisers.
Under Bill Clinton (a CFR member who selected 12 CFR members for his cabinet), the United States enacted NAFTA, an economic alliance with Mexico and Canada. This arrangement was created by the establishment, not by the American people, who did not suspect the game being played on them. Not only did NAFTA swamp us with cheap, job-destroying imports, but it was designed to be the foundation for a continental economic union leading to political union. Robert Pastor (CFR), a key architect of North American integration, acknowledged in the January/February 2004 issue of Foreign Affairs: “NAFTA was merely the first draft of an economic constitution for North America.” And Andrew Reding of the World Policy Institute said: “NAFTA will signal the formation, however tentatively, of a new political unit — North America. With economic integration will come political integration. By whatever name, this is an incipient form of international government. Following the lead of the Europeans, North Americans should begin considering formation of a continental parliament.” [Emphasis added.]
A similar stratagem had been used against the peoples of Europe — by first deceptively hooking them into an “economic” alliance called the Common Market, which then, requiring common laws to regulate trade, transformed via a series of steps into the European Union, the super-national government of Europe that is swallowing up national sovereignty.
Following the initial step enacted under Clinton, President George W. Bush, whose father was a CFR director, moved toward politicizing the NAFTA alliance. On March 23, 2005, he met Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin to launch the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), the rudiments of a North American Union. CNN’s Lou Dobbs said of it:
“President Bush signed a formal agreement that will end the United States as we know it.”
Furthermore, regional alliances such as the European Union and proposed North American Union are not ends, but only steppingstones to world government. As CFR/Trilateralist Zbigniew Brzezinski stated:
“We cannot leap into world government in one quick step. The precondition for genuine globalization is progressive regionalization.”
In furtherance of this, on April 30, 2007, President Bush stood at the White House beside Angela Merkel, president of the European Council, and José Manuel Barroso, president of the European Commission, and announced the signing of a new agreement to “strengthen transatlantic economic integration.” It called for “joint work in the areas of regulatory cooperation, financial markets, trade and transport security, innovation and technological development, intellectual property rights, energy, investment, competition, services, and government procurement,” and various other steps toward economic integration. But as usual, “economic integration” is the predecessor of political integration. CFR members have dreamed of a political union between the United States and Europe since the 1950s, when the CFR-dominated Atlantic Union Committee promoted a merger they called “Atlantica.”
Candidate Barack Obama revealed he would proceed with the Bush initiatives. In a speech in Berlin on July 24, 2008, he stated:
That is why the greatest danger of all is to allow new walls to divide us from one another. The walls between old allies on either side of the Atlantic cannot stand. The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand. The walls between races and tribes; natives and immigrants; Christian and Muslim and Jew cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down…. Yes, there have been differences between America and Europe. No doubt, there will be differences in the future. But the burdens of global citizenship continue to bind us together…. In this new century, Americans and Europeans alike will be required to do more — not less. Partnership and cooperation among nations is not a choice; it is the one way, the only way, to protect our common security and advance our common humanity.
Obama had only been president for a little over two months when he traveled to Europe for a series of meetings with European leaders. He attended the G20 Summit, which ended with a tentative agreement to launch a new global financial system, using as the rationale for this major step toward global government the recent Fed- and government-spawned financial meltdown.
Henry Kissinger — foreign policy mouthpiece of the establishment for four decades — wrote an article for the January 12, 2009 issue of the International Herald Tribune entitled “The Chance for a New World Order.” He stated:
As the new U.S. administration prepares to take office amid grave financial and international crises, it may seem counterintuitive to argue that the very unsettled nature of the international system generates a unique opportunity for creative diplomacy….Even the most affluent countries will confront shrinking resources. Each will have to redefine its national priorities. An international order will emerge if a system of compatible priorities comes into being….The alternative to a new international order is chaos.
Kissinger also stated on CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street”: “The president-elect is coming into office at a moment when there is upheaval in many parts of the world simultaneously…. His task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a new world order can be created. It’s a great opportunity, it isn’t just a crisis.”
Past statements reveal that the establishment wants a single currency for the world, just as the EU has consolidated its currencies into the “euro.” As far back as the 1944 Bretton Woods Conference, John Maynard Keynes proposed a world currency he dubbed bancor. Richard L. Gardner (CFR) wrote in the Fall 1984 Foreign Affairs: “I suggest a radical alternative scheme for the next century: the creation of common currency for all the industrial democracies and a joint Bank of Issue to determine that Monetary Policy.”
In March of this year, Obama and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown met with reporters at the White House. Brown announced that “there is the possibility in the next few months of a global new deal that will involve all the countries of the world in sorting out and cleaning up the banking system.” Obama added that:
Globalization can be an enormous force for good…. But what is also true is … we still have a 1930s regulatory system in place in most countries designed from the last great crisis, that we’ve got to update our institutions, our regulatory frameworks, so that the power of globalization is channeled for the benefit of ordinary men and women.
If trends continue, however, the changes can be expected to benefit a tiny handful of the global elite, not “ordinary men and women.” Further evidence that Obama’s administration will simply continue the globalist agenda is indicated by his appointments.
CFR Domination Continues
During his campaign, Obama selected the ubiquitous Zbigniew Brzezinski (CFR), promoter of the “regional” approach to world government, as one of his top foreign policy advisors. Obama called Brzezinski “one of our more outstanding thinkers” and “somebody I have learned an immense amount from.” Presumably Brzezinski’s teachings included the world government he advocates.
For Treasury Secretary, Obama chose Timothy Geithner: Senior Fellow in International Economics at the CFR, Bilderberger, former head of the New York Federal Reserve, and former employee of both the IMF and Kissinger Associates. One doesn’t get more establishment than that! It is Geithner who is managing the bailout of Wall Street with taxpayer dollars. Assisting Geithner at Treasury in overseeing the auto industry bailout is fellow CFR member Stephen Rattner.
For Director of the National Economic Council — a U.S. government agency created by a Bill Clinton executive order — Obama selected Lawrence Summers (CFR, Bilderberger). Former Chief Economist at the World Bank, his last position was at the investment firm of D. E. Shaw & Co, where he earned $5.2 million in one year while working one day per week. Henry Kissinger had said Summers should “be given a White House post in which he was charged with shooting down or fixing bad ideas.”
For Defense Secretary, Obama elected to continue with Bush pick Robert Gates (CFR, Bilderberger). During the Carter administration, Gates served as a special assistant to Zbigniew Brzezinski. In 2004, he co-chaired a CFR Task Force on Iran with Brzezinski, who lauded Gates in Time in 2008. Joining Gates in the Defense Department are fellow CFR members Michele Flournoy (Under Secretary of Defense for Policy), Jeh C. Johnson (Defense Department General Counsel), and Kathleen Hicks (Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Strategy, Plans and Forces).
For Secretary of State, Obama chose Hillary Clinton, who has attended the top-secret Bilderberger meetings. Hillary is not a CFR member, but husband Bill is, and her State Department is laden with CFR members, including James B. Steinberg (Deputy Secretary of State), William J. Burns (Under Secretary for Political Affairs), Susan Rice (U.S. Ambassador to the UN), Jacob J. Lew (Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources), Todd Stern (Special Envoy for Climate Change), and many others.
The Department of Homeland Security, which many Americans fear may turn our country into an Orwellian surveillance society, was conceived before 9/11 by a task force called the U.S. Commission on National Security, nine of whose 12 members belonged to the CFR. The administration of the department under Obama is particularly heavy with CFR members, including Janet Napolitano (Secretary), Jane Holl Lute (Deputy Secretary), Juliette Kayyem (Assistant Secretary, Office of Intergovernmental Programs), and Alan Bersin (Assistant Secretary, Office of International Affairs).
Thus the CFR continues to dominate our government’s key areas: finance, defense, foreign policy, and security. To this may be added various other Obama CFR appointees, such as Mona Sutphen (White House Deputy Chief of Staff), Paul Volcker (Chairman, Economic Recovery Advisory Board), Peter Cowhey, (Senior Counsel, Office of U.S. Trade Representative), and Eric Shinseki (Secretary of Veterans Affairs).
The idea that Barack Obama became president from a “grass-roots” movement is illusory. American government policy continues to be largely dictated by the rich and the few. This is generally unknown to the public — not because it is a bizarre conspiracy theory, but because the same power elite who run our government, mega-banks, and multinational corporations also run the major media, as an inspection of the CFR membership roster would reveal.
Membership in the CFR, of course, is not an automatic condemnation. A few people are added as “window dressing” to give the group distinction and a veneer of diversity. An example is movie star Angelina Jolie. No one suspects Jolie knows much about foreign affairs or is a conspirator for world government. But within the CFR are hardcore globalists who, linked with their foreign counterparts through the Bilderbergers and Trilateral Commission, head the drive for one-world government.
Though numerically small (less than 1,000 members during the Kennedy years, less than 4,500 today), this organization has dominated every administration for over seven decades.
As long as the CFR controls our government, we can anticipate more of the same: diminishing national sovereignty; free flow of immigration (which confuses national identity and weakens national loyalties); increasing jobs losses through multinational trade agreements; further internationalization of law (Law of the Sea Treaty, Kyoto Protocol, World Court, global taxation, etc.); increasing loss of freedoms in a “surveillance society”; progressive organization of the United States, Mexico, and Canada into a North American Union; and ultimately, broader merger into a world government where all power will be concentrated in the hands of the elite.
Eternal vigilance continues to be the price of freedom.
(End of New American article)
To Get To The Globalists Who Are Pulling The Strings At The Top, The Next Step Is To Pass Through The Portal Of The Wizard Of Oz
The Perfect Analogy: The Wizard of Oz
Directly after this short clip, you will be presented with new explanation of “how the world actually works,” and best analogy to get there is the stunning discovery by Dorothy, the Tin Man, the Cowardly Lion, and the Straw Man of how the Kingdom of Oz actually worked. Remember that when Todo, their dog, pulled back the curtain with its teeth, what they discovered was beyond their current knowledge and also beyond their current imaginations.
The top globalists we seek behind the curtain have been in existence much longer that most Americans could ever imagine, as you will see.
And from here, please understand that the only reason you haven’t discovered much of what you will now see and here is because the “mainstream media,” from which we receive nearly all our information is owned by the top globalists and its core purpose is to maintain a solid curtain of lies, deceptions, distractions, disinformation, and psychological mind-games to keep us dumbed down, unaware, and For most Americans, this is currently beyond their current knowledge and their current imaginations. I had no idea–no knowledge–that America had a “most deadly foreign enemy,” nor was that possibility even in my current imagination. Therefore, my own reaction upon first learning of this high treason by the “mainstream media” was shock, denial, and nausea.
I’ll try to give this disturbing information to you as gently as possible:
Where Are The Top Globalists Located? They Mostly Operate From the City of London.
“The City of London Corporation, officially and legally the Mayor and Commonalty and Citizens of the City of London, is the municipal governing body of the City of London, the historic centre of London and the location of much of the UK’s financial sector. In 2006 the name was changed from Corporation of London to avoid confusion with the wider London local government, the Greater London Authority.
The corporation claims to be the world’s oldest continuously elected local government body. Both businesses and residents of the City, or “Square Mile”, are entitled to vote in elections, and in addition to its functions as the local authority analogous to those undertaken by the boroughs that administer the rest of London it takes responsibility for supporting the financial services industry and representing its interests. The corporation’s structure includes the Lord Mayor, the Court of Aldermen, the Court of Common Council, and the Freemen and Livery of the City. ” (From Wikipedia)
The Top Globalists—-America’s Most Deadly Enemy—-Are A Clique of Foreign Banking Families, Joined By Old-Line Narcotics Families and Royal Families of Bygone European Monarchies; and All Are Dynastic Families of Long Lineage and Immense Wealth Beyond Our Imaginations
“Persons of Interest” in Investigating the Clique of Foreign, Dynastic Families in the Global Narcotics Trade Monopoly
Queen Elizabeth II the largest landowner on Earth
Queen Elizabeth II, head of state of the United Kingdom and of 31 other states and territories, is the legal owner of about 6,600 million acres of land, one sixth of the earth’s non ocean surface.
She is the only person on earth who owns whole countries, and who owns countries that are not her own domestic territory. This land ownership is separate from her role as head of state and is different from other monarchies where no such claim is made – Norway, Belgium, Denmark etc.
The value of her land holding. £17,600,000,000,000 (approx).
This makes her the richest individual on earth. However, there is no way easily to value her real estate. There is no current market in the land of entire countries. At a rough estimate of $5,000 an acre, and based on the sale of Alaska to the USA by the Tsar, and of Louisiana to the USA by France, the Queen’s land holding is worth a notional $33,000,000,000,000 (Thirty three trillion dollars or about £17,600,000,000,000). Her holding is based on the laws of the countries she owns and her land title is valid in all the countries she owns. Her main holdings are Canada, the 2nd largest country on earth, with 2,467 million acres, Australia, the 7th largest country on earth with 1,900 million acres, the Papua New Guinea with114 million acres, New Zealand with 66 million acres and the UK with 60 million acres.
She is the world’s largest landowner by a significant margin.
The next largest landowner is the Russian state, with an overall ownership of 4,219 million acres, and a direct ownership comparable with the Queen’s land holding of 2,447 million acres.
The 3rd largest landowner is the Chinese state, which claims all of Chinese land, about 2,365 million acres.
The 4th largest landowner on earth is the Federal Government of the United States, which owns about one third of the land of the USA, 760 million acres.
The fifth largest landowner on earth is the King of Saudi Arabia with 553 million acres.
(Queen Beatrix has stepped down in favor of her son)
The Du Pont Family, Wilmington, Delaware—-arrived in America in 1800
The Du Pont family is an American family descended from Pierre Samuel du Pont de Nemours (1739-1817). The son of a Parisian watchmaker and a member of a Burgundian Huguenot family, and descendant of a minor noble family on his mother’s side, he and his sons, Victor Marie du Pont and Éleuthère Irénée du Pont, immigrated to the United States in 1800 and used the resources of their Huguenot heritage to found one of the most prominent of American families, and one of its most successful corporations, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, initially established by Éleuthère Irénée as a gunpowder manufacturer.
In 1802, Éleuthère Irénée du Pont established a gunpowder mill on the banks of the Brandywine Creek near Wilmington, Delaware. The location provided all the necessities to operate the mill: a water flow sufficient to power it, available timber (mainly willow trees) that could be turned into charcoal fine enough to use for gunpowder, close proximity to the Delaware River to allow for shipments of sulfur and saltpeter, the other ingredients used in the manufacture of gunpowder. There were also nearby stone quarries to provide needed building materials. Over time the Du Pont company grew into the largest black powder manufacturing firm in the world (from Wikipedia).
Prescott Bush is the father of George Herbert Walker Bush
UN Special Representative for International Migration
Person of Interest as Co-Conspirator With George Soros To Carry Out The Controlled Disintegration
Of The European Union By Overwhelming The European Population With Muslim Immigrants
Top American-Born Minions Serving the Clique of Foreign Banking Families
The Clique’s Israeli Trojan Horse Command Network
The clique of dynastic banking families has developed a specific network of individuals who have infiltrated the U.S. government, its agencies, and all key American institutions, including the establishment media, American education, and the entertainment industry, among many other organizations that constitute the vital parts of our American society. This network is referred to as the clique’s “Israeli Trojan Horse” because the clique created its own nation—Israel—-on May 1, 1949 and proceeded to launch a deep infiltration of American institutions and those of many other nation-states to cloak and carry out its global criminality.
The Clique’s Trojan Horse: Israel, their NeoCons, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Israeli Lobby (AIPAC) Have Infiltrated the Pentagon
The Israeli government has had a sway over the U.S. government that is totally out of proportion, given the size of Israel’s population (approx. 7 million people) and its modest importance to America’s national interests. It’s a loose dot that needs connecting. As usual it is a “tell” of something that has been going on for quite some time—a concealed scheme of the clique to combine Israel, its American neocons, and the ADL for the purpose of moving its minions into the Pentagon to try to lock up control of the U.S. military. The most important part the clique’s strategy has been to force the American public to provide enormous financial support to Israel, particularly in a huge military buildup that already includes nuclear weapons. That is why U.S. foreign aid has been severely out of balance in favor of this tiny country of Israel. Since Since 2001 the American taxpayers have provided a yearly average of $2.7 billion of foreign aid, with $2.2 billion annually (over 80%) going to Israeli military costs.
The country that receives the next highest foreign aid is Egypt, with an annual average of $1.8 billion, of which an average of $1.3 billion (72%) was designated for Egypt’s military costs. The chart above proves my point. By piecing together several databases, it is clear that Israel receives more than double the amount of foreign aid from the U.S. taxpayers than any other foreign aid recipient. But, again, what does Israel offer to justify double the aid of any other country?
Israel’s purpose has always been to be: (i) the clique’s military fortress in the Middle East to protect its ownership interest in that region’s vast oil reserves” and, even more important, (ii) to have the Israeli government, its intelligence agencies, and its military become the active agent, working entirely for the clique in carrying out its concealed schemes and manufacture the high level of global fraud designed to cover these schemes. Accordingly, the Israeli Trojan Horse network is merely an extension of the concealed clique into American and all other nations the clique seeks to control.
This scheme started with the substantial funding provided by the clique to enable it to gain full control over the Israeli government at its inception on May 14, 1948. It was in the clique’s interest to construct a military fortress in the midst of its widespread oil holdings in the Middle East in an environment of very unfriendly Muslim populations. This has been the concealed scheme of the clique, namely, to improve its monopoly over the world’s oil reserves. The Iraq War gained them control over the fifth largest oil reserves; the rigged Arab Spring movement resulted in capturing Libya, with its tenth largest oil reserves. Now, Iran, with its 4th largest oil reserves, is next, with Israel’s dominant military machine—including nuclear weapons—breathing down their necks.
The reason this is a Trojan Horse story is because Israeli government officials enter America on false pretenses. Their cover story is that Israel needs that high level of financial assistance because it is beleaguered by unfriendly Arab countries that would like to drive the Israeli population into the sea and only a strong defense will deter attacks on Israel. This a patently false because Israel has nuclear weapons and an unparalleled military machine funded by the U.S. taxpayer, and the full retaliatory might of the U.S. military behind that, if needed. None of their Arab neighbors have such an overwhelming military machine. Operating behind this charade, the Israeli Trojan Horse inserts throughout the U.S. government and its institutions, (i) undercover spies (Americans and Israelis), and (ii) it finances and directs a visible set of Americans—deceptively referred to as New Conservatives (nicknamed: neocons) as if they were an authentic American interest group. My research indicates they are no such thing. Instead, they are an unconstitutional presence in our military and State Department, under the control of the clique of families and are here to fill important positions inside the Pentagon, as well as in the State Department. In other words, the Israeli Trojan Horse is just another fraudulent scheme of the clique of families. Its real purpose is to gain full control of the use of the American military to serve its interests. And as happens from time to time, when the Israeli Trojan Horse and its spies and neocons attract criticism, the clique’s Anti-Defamation League (ADL), headed by Abe Foxman, swings into action to smear those asking legitimate questions with accusations of anti-semitism and hate crimes, which, in turn, triggers American politicians to come to the full support of Israel for fear of voter retaliation. The Israeli Trojan Horse includes its all powerful American lobbying group, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), which has locked nearly all members of the U.S. Congress and the Administration under its control through massive bribery, otherwise known as campaign finance funding.
Digging down into the clique’s “intrigues, within intrigues, within intrigues,” my research indicates that one of their schemes currently underway is to foment a war between the U.S., on one side, and China and Russia on the other side. Fomenting war has been a central part of the clique’s playbook since their inception: it is immensely profitable to them, it destabilizes rival powers, and a nuclear war with China and Russia would also serve the clique’s world de-population plans, as mind-boggling as it seems. In this current scheme, Iran is the pawn. The Israeli government, under clique-installed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has demanded that Israel and the U.S. jointly bomb Iranian nuclear facilities to prevent the Iranian government from developing nuclear weapons. That is the distraction that the clique has created with its controlled media smokescreen. Meanwhile, its three-headed terrorist organization—Mossad, SIS, and the CIA—is waging a covert, special operations war within Iran, assassinating Iranian nuclear scientists, blowing up Iranian facilities, arming ethnic separatist groups on Iran’s borders, and carrying out cyber-warfare against Iranian nuclear facilities. My research indicates that the U.S. military sees and understands this machination, and has expressed to President Obama and Congress its unwillingness to get drawn into a war in Iran, which could escalate to include Russia and China. Of course, Israeli Trojan Horse is working behind the scenes within the Pentagon to force a U.S. military confrontation with Syria and Iran, that has blown up in their face.
Commentary: When subjected to public scrutiny, some of the members, junior partners, and minions of the foreign clique of dynastic banking families mentioned herein try to hide behind authentic Judaism and deceptively claim anti-semitism and hate crimes at work. These individuals who pretend to be Jews are impostors and are not Jews in any way. The colossal destruction and enormous loss of life (to Gentiles and Jews alike) left in the wake of clique schemes have proven irrefutably that they don’t have a religious or humanitarian bone in their bodies, only the instincts of lower-order criminal psychopaths; the last dregs of a dying feudal era that originated in early Venetian dominance of European monarchies and populations.
Of course, we only hear from the clique-controlled media about Israeli spy activities in America when Israeli spies are caught. Their names are few: Stewart Nozette (2009), Ben-ami Kadish (2008), and Jonathan Pollard (1987). But what about the visible element of the Israeli Trojan Horse; who are these neocons?
ROGUE AMERICA, THE QUIET MUTINY
HOW PRIVATIZATION, RELIGION AND CONSTITUTIONAL AB– USES HAVE CREATED A SHADOW STATE
Forces well outside any political system envisioned by the Founding Fathers control America, forces capable of side-stepping or overruling any elected official or any law, up to and including, even especially, the Constitution of the United States of America.
By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor, on January 14, 2011
A little over 2 weeks ago, John Wheeler III, former Special Assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force, a man whose Washington resume put him in contact with presidents, was found in the back of a garbage truck. Two weeks later, there is no police investigation, no cause of death, no questions from the press, just silence, deafening silence.
Nothing is said of Wheeler’s career, a high profile Vietnam veteran, a man much admired, even loved. Work, bio-chem warfare, nuclear programs, now totally blacked out. All that remains is a moment or two of video, very inexplicable, Wheeler, the consummate disciplined professional drifting in what seems to be an LSD induced haze. There, the curtain was drawn, the door was closed, no further cover story, no prepared lie, the imagineers responsible for such things caught off balance, this time at least.
John Wheeler was clearly, The Man Who Knew Too Much.
Wheeler was also a contractor, part of the army of private citizens that now control everything that the Department of Homeland Security does not. We call this privatization.
PRIVATIZATION AND UNACCOUNTABILITY
Privatization, another word for parallelization put control of most defense and intelligence functions into the hands of unaccountable no-bid private contractors, invariably politically partisan and many uniquely willing to engage in criminality on a level heretofore unimagined.
What the marriage between a private sector, tasked with the most sensitive functions of national security, those requiring the most oversight, those subject to the most hideous abuses and an administration no longer clearly in control of the reins of government, have done to the world is a disaster, unique even by 20th century standards.
The largest military power in the history of man would become a defacto mercenary force, virtually seizing Central Asia, pre-staging it for systematic enslavement, for stripping it of resources. The economic model is amazing in scope. $300 billion a year are spent in Afghanistan. $200 billion of that is stolen. The only result of America military action? Destruction of the region, impoverishment of America and $65 billion in heroin production.
Wheeler death leads us down several avenues. They twist, they turn, they interweave, but they all end up one place, one inexorable place, another factoid making up the mosaic, the pattern revealing the fact, now unavoidable to so many, that a secret government exists. Government may be the wrong word, as chaos is hardly government and chaos is where that mosaic is taking us. A senseless and almost childish alternative reality has been created by the press and pop culture, groups that Helen Thomas would tell us are one in the same.
Hiding behind a veil of secrecy, protected by Kafkaesque bureaucracies, one upon another, shielded by a total breakdown of societal responsibility, each sector, be it pubic education, finance, news and media, government and defense, each more complicit than the last, an overwhelming hunger for truth and a feeling of solidity, of believability has driven millions to follow conspiracy as the new religion.
Even that, itself, is now managed, Wikileaks and its press partnerships, the alternative media drowned in a cacophony of rubbish, co-opted, infiltrated, influenced and bought.
1963 THRU REAGAN
Since the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963, there have been continual whispers about a shadow government running the United States. This cabal is said to have taken America into Vietnam, its most disastrous war and planned, with Israel, the false flag USS Liberty attack in 1967 to push America into invading the Middle East.
The first undeniable public signs of a shadow government came to light under Reagan with Iran Contra, when a White House based group, selling arms to our enemies, running drugs on a massive scale, was discovered. Dozens of top officials were tried, convicted, some convictions were overturned on manufactured technicalities, others, including a Secretary of Defense, received presidential pardons. The claim was fighting communism in Central America. The truth, the communists left power after losing free elections, ones the communists, themselves held, while our patriots, the secret government, filled our cities with crack cocaine by the ton, lined their own pockets and built an organization that would later be used to rig elections and derail America freedoms.
COUP BY LEWINSKI
Normally, the shadow government is never spoken of. We saw the hand of a shadow government when, then ˜first lady Hillary Clinton talked about a vast right wing conspiracy. She was immediately crushed by the press for this and her attempt to break the stranglehold the pharmaceutical industry has on congress, one recently re-instituted with vigor. It was the shadow government that unleashed Monica Lewinsky and later used private financing to impeach President Clinton.
Hillary, in an act of incredible bravery, had stepped on the real third rail of American power. No, it isn’t the typical sacred cow, Israel. Today we say that Carter was anti-Israel, but it was Reagan who had the character to stand up to them, a power long disappeared from American politics.
Hillary threatened the pharmaceutical industry, then at the height of its influence. Today, with up to 40% of America military forces on anti-psychotic medications, the dream of mind control and MK Ultra has been exceeded beyond any but the wildest imagination. With typical side effects being suicidal ideation, chemical castration, tremors, delusion, loss of will, loss of judgement, loss of employability, generations of zombies walk, drive, stumble, many in a semi-dreamlike state, through America’s 21st century landscape.
Censorship and secrecy are needed less and less as pharmacology and dumbed down public education takes its inevitable toll.
The shadow government gained form in 2000. The Republican nomination was rigged, John McCain was crushed by manufactured scandals, all with one purpose, to put the team of Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, cohorts since the Nixon years, into power. The vehicle was the hapless dupe, George W Bush.
The 2000 election, rigged voting machines, a strict construction Supreme Court picking a president based on a wildly liberal interpretation of the constitutions equal protection theory, was the opening salvo in a war, the globalists against humanity. Implementation of the agenda began with 9/11 and the phony terror wars.
The mechanism of entropy, corruption, economic collapse and the drug empire in Afghanistan, there is little doubt anymore. Forces well outside any political system envisioned by the Founding Fathers control America, forces capable of side-stepping or overruling any elected official or any law, up to and including, even especially, the Constitution of the United States of America.
Normally, the shadow government covers its tracks well, as members of the 9/11 Commission have been shouting from the rooftops for years. Even when it doesn’t, secrecy and censorship step in, always protecting the public from the problems created by, well, created by censorship and secrecy.
MINOT-BARKSDALE, THE FORGOTTEN MUTINY
In August 2007, at least 6 nuclear warheads were stolen from Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota. The moment they were loaded, they disappeared from America’s nuclear inventory, location unknown, something that is not supposed to happen. There is no possible misinterpretation of orders, no mistake, no wrong label issue. These weapons were stolen, pure and simple. Discussions of individual commanders having authority to deploy weapons, stories of accidents, confusion or political alignments within the Air Force are red herrings.
Nothing is more controlled, more secure, more restricted, more classified, more protected than the nuclear arsenal of the United States. However, on that fateful day in 2007, a half dozen or more, hydrogen bombs, were plucked out of a secure bunker with no paperwork, no orders, nothing.
This is the military. People are jailed for losing flashlight batteries.
They were loaded into the weapons bay of a B-52 long range bomber for transport to places unknown, for purposes unknown. The plane had no orders, was part of no mission, operated under no legal command structure, in fact, the moment the weapons were loaded, was no longer an American plane at all. A mission, even under the most innocent possible circumstances, that would have required the knowledge of the President and his staff, certainly the Joint Chiefs of Staff and likely the National Security Council as well, seems to have authorized itself, out of thin air.
Though the plane later landed at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana, there is no evidence supporting this as the intended destination, far from it.
The theft, hijacking, you pick the term, these are the best two so far, happened outside the command authority of the United States government, contravening all protocols for the storage, handling and deployment of nuclear weapons. The incident was also a violation of treaties requiring America to safeguard her stockpile of nuclear weapons, not just from environmental disasters but, as with this incident, from a mutiny by members of the military and civilian branches of our government, acting outside authority, acting as civilians, an act of piracy, mutiny, an act of insurrection.
All the things Israel warns America about every day, radical groups in Iran and Pakistan getting control of nukes really happened, but not with Muslim radicals and not in the Middle East, it happened here at home. The radicals were Christians, of a sort at least, possibly intent on Armageddon, maybe planning to sell the weapons to Iran or North Korea or, more likely, tucking them away for a rainy day.
The Minot-Barksdale incident demonstrated, not only that a secret government exists but it is capable of waging, not only foreign policy but of mounting a credible thermonuclear threat to the world.
A NOT SO COINCIDENTAL COINCIDENCE
When a planeload of nuclear weapons is hijacked by an extremist organization tied to the highest levels of power in America, we might ask, why then? What was going on in America in August 2007? Did something happen then? Why were 6 nuclear weapons stolen at the exact same time America suffered the largest financial collapse, became the victim of the largest financial crime in world history? Is this a coincidence?
We know these things for sure:
This was the 11th hour, the last minutes of the 11th hour, the last chance to begin a war with Iran. Iraq had been temporarily stabilized by massive bribes paid out under General Petraeus’ Sunni Awakening program, a “band-aid” fix that would soon come apart, Afghanistan had become a hopeless quagmire and the public had turned on President Bush, giving him the lowest approval ratings of all time, leaving his presidency failed and discredited.
What had begun as a minor mortgage crisis had revealed a deeper disease, the toxic derivitives schemes that would collapse America’s entire financial system. Only 5% of the mismanaged funds were mortgage related, 95% was a massive Ponzi scheme by banks that had taken to creating wealth out of thin air, underwriting the entire American economy, bond and stock markets, corporate earnings, pension plans, all backed by nothing at all. The money most American’s thought they had wasn’t even the counterfeit trash spewed by the Federal Reserve. It was, in fact, imaginary, soon to be gone, poof!
How could 6 nuclear weapons, providing this was the only theft, something we may never learn, be used to cover the crimes of America’s entire financial community? What use of weapons of mass destruction would have changed the public’s perception, a public increasingly suspicious of the other great coincidence of all time, 9/11?
Were weapons to be taken outside the country to attack others or to be brought back, a container in a seaport, a vending machine in a stadium, atop a missile, brought home? For years, the front men for the secret government, the ones easily recognized, had done little but prepare America for such an eventuality. With $12 trillion dollars missing, would the incineration of an American city be enough?
MEANS, MOTIVE AND OPPORTUNITY
Professional law enforcement personnel, where such things still exist, look at any criminal act in three stages, Means, Motive and Opportunity. Means and motive are not obvious at all, not unless one is willing to accept that top commanders of the United States Air Force are traitors.
Let’s take a second to examine a frightening trend that may have led to this seeming vulnerability. How could the United States Air Force have been infiltrated with commanders loyal to power structure outside any accepted norm? What kind of values would make this possible? To understand the breakdown in command in the Air Force, we must look at the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs.
THE TALIBANIZATION OF THE AIR FORCE
Several months ago, Veterans Today was contacted by a delegation of officers candidates attending the Academy. They told us that the Academy was run by a religious cult, known as Dominionists. This group, this cult, violent, predatory, accused of brain washing recruits, tormenting, intimidating, is rapidly gaining total control of the officers corps of the United States Air Force. Their agenda is a strange version of Evangelical Zionism, subservience of women, bizarre beliefs in nuclear apocalypse and, worst of all, a total disregard for Constitutional authority and legal command structure.
Is this group capable of stealing nuclear weapons which might be used against the United States? The only answer is a resounding Yes!
Can the beliefs of a bizarre religious cult constitute motive for nuclear theft? Does this cult have enough means and opportunity to attempt this kind of operation, one possibly meant to bring about a nuclear apocalypse and trigger the “end times” as required by their beliefs?
What American has proven to the world, at least those nations with a free press and a people still capable of critical thinking is that, not only is the nuclear arsenal of the United States the most vulnerable, those guarding it are the most radicalized and the most prone toward acts of terrorism.
America’s nuclear arsenal has been guarded by a Taliban for decades. What could the motive for this be?
THE TAIWAN QUESTION AND MORE
An American B-52 was forced to land and hand over its cargo of nuclear weapons at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana and 80 Air Force personnel were forced to resign. Problems with discipline were listed as the reason. The Air Force calls the incident a bent spear, a simple violation of procedure.
Despite the public whitewash, the bent spear was clearly, not only a broken arrow but as Senator Levin indicated, no breach of nuclear procedures of this magnitude has ever occurred. Senator Bill Nelson called it sloppy. What it wasn’t was the first time such a thing has happened.
In 2006, what we are told were nuclear fuses for the Minuteman III missile were sent to Taiwan, packaged as helicopter batteries.
At that time, the Minuteman was undergoing major upgrades, not only in safety mechanisms but in targeting capability also. The fusing units that were available for shipment weren’t simply fuses, they were designed to upgrade our aging fleet of Minuteman missiles, America’s state of the art targeting technology for our most important deterrent system.
What really happened? Certainly not what we were told. Does Taiwan have the technology, having adapted it to systems they have purchased elsewhere, nuclear triggers, perhaps they have one or more of the nuclear weapons believed to be missing from the Israeli-South African arsenal? Did they keep the technology or sell it to China or India? Was this another accident,?
In October, 2010, 50 Minuteman III missiles, 1/9th of those in America’s arsenal, went walkabout for 45 minutes, under the control of, well, we don’t really know. We only know that the official government of the United States didn’t have them, enough megatonage to turn Europe into a cinder.
A month later, an ICBM was launched from a submarine 35 miles off Los Angeles. The US claimed it was an airplane, a weather balloon but missile technicians identified it as a large ICBM, unknown origin, unauthorized and, as with the murder of John Wheeler III, something Americans are asked to overlook, forget, pretend never happened.
THE SHADOW IN PLAIN SIGHT
Normally, hubris, the ego that makes criminal sociopaths want their work appreciated, whether it is looting banks or raping and murdering busloads of small children, has negative consequences. When Vice President Cheney established a special operations command inside his own office, one that directed military and intelligence operations without budget approval or legal oversight of any kind, he was demonstrating the hubris of a criminal psychopath.
Look at the legality, even by Alberto Gonzales standards.
It is one thing for a nation state to resort to torture, kidnapping or even acts of military aggression, backed by attempts at justification such as those seen in 2003 by Colin Powell at the United Nations. Powell lost his career, the respect of the world and America was branded a rogue nation and aggressor.
When an elected official, such as the Vice President, an office tasked with attending funerals and, in actuality, nothing else, begins, not only formulating policy outside the office of the presidency but conducting military operations on its own authority, an authority that does not exist, no law, certainly not the constitution, then the individual holding that office is in insurrection against the government of the United States.
The vice president can’t order kidnappings, killings by the dozen, maybe hundreds or more, can’t command troops in the field, the vice president is the Commander in Chief of nothing whatsoever. There is no command authority of any kind, real or implied, in that office nor can any be assigned or transferred there unless the President of the United States is incapacitated.
The 25th Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1967, contains the following language:
Section 3. Whenever the President transmits to the President pro-tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.
Section 4. Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.
Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.
Outside of these specific circumstances, the Vice President acts in an advisory capacity only with no authority other than that outlined in the Constitution, which specifies that the Vice President presides over the Senate and may cast tie-breaking votes if and when circumstances dictate.
The issue of Vice President Cheney is only germane based on his public assumption of clear presidential and super-presidential authority, extra-constitutional authority, during the administration of George W. Bush. The actions involved, aggressive war, operation of secret prisons, assassinations and more are capital crimes as outlined during the Nuremberg War Tribunals and subject to international jurisdiction.
Do these acts, the ones Cheney (and Rumsfeld) publicly acknowledge, the ones we can prove, combined with coincidences, so many of those, give adequate reason for us to assume a conspiracy, a secret globalist cabal, is acting in place of the intended government of the United States? Has the brush of history, itself, left little room for assumptions otherwise?
Commentary: This is as far as the “alternative media” will go to describe how the world actually works. The writer, Gordon Duff, alludes to a “shadow government” that rules America and engages in extreme criminality and extreme unconstitutional behavior, but he cannot or will not connect the dots he mentions herein to anyone higher than the members of the Bush administration. Nonetheless, it is certainly plausible to suggest that the Bush family is, and has been, a junior partners with the concealed clique of foreign dynastic banking families, a relationship which goes back to the 1930s, when President George W. Bush’s grandfather, Prescott Bush, was a partner with Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. in the 1930s. This firm and the Union Banking Corporation, which Prescott Bush later founded, participated in financing Hitler’s Third Reich, as did the clique. Another tell of the Bush family connection with the clique was that Prescott, his son, George H.W. Bush, and his grandson, George W. Bush were groomed at Yale and also at Yale’s Skull and Bones secret society, which were, and continue to be, training grounds for clique minions in America. This treasonous Bush family relationship with a foreign enemy power—the clique—would fully explain all the odd circumstances described in Gordon Duff’s piece, particularly the ability for the clique to install Richard Cheney—-who was far more experienced that George W. Bush—-as Vice President with presidential powers. And it would explain the infiltration of the Air Force top hierarchy with clique minions as well as how the nuclear weapons could be stolen for nefarious purposes. In fact, it is plausible that the nuclear weapons were destined to be dropped on Iran to end its own nuclear program and to force regime change that would immediately result in Iran’s new government joining the clique’s fraudulent global banking system. A common thread between America’s enemies is their refusal to be part of the clique’s suffocating control of the world’s financial system. History has proven that refusing to participate practically guarantees enormous political pressure, espionage, economic disturbances, weather catastrophes, destruction of nuclear plants (Fukushima) and war, if necessary.
“Mainstream Media” Creates Mass Deception: Mass Deception Breeds Mass Psychosis
Mass Psychosis: a severe mental disorder of whole groups or populations in which thought and emotions are so impaired that contact is lost with external reality. Furthermore, mass psychosis is exacerbated by the inability of members of whole groups or populations to exercise their critical thinking skills.
The long plan of controlled disintegration of America and its economy wouldn’t be complete without a sophisticated psychological warfare weapon in the hands of the concealed clique of foreign, dynastic banking families in the City of London. The sophistication comes from a psychological warfare weapon that: (i) surrounds us with a non-stop flow of deceptions to lock us within a high wall of false reality and, (ii) overwhelms us with an intense barrage of false messages the intended impact of which is to change our personal identities to ones more conducive to the clique’s one-world government fantasy. A number of psychological warfare operations come to mind and can be seen as tools used to carry out massive acts of fraud:
1. The Deception of America’s Current Economic Recovery, which, since 2008-2009, has proven to be built on fraudulent data. GDP is declining, the real unemployment is at 23%, national debt is at $19 trillion+. All other metrics of economic health are in ominous retreat and only now is the public realizing the mountains of lies and false data that kept them in the dark.
2. The Deception of Globalization: The concealed clique manufactured “globalization” as if it were an evolutionary advance of humanity. All three sources of the false narrative (news media/education/entertainment) swung into action in a coordinated manner to deceive the public and only now, with the elimination of our manufacturing sector and our middle class nearly gone, are we finally awake.
3. The Deception of Global Terrorism: The coordination of the media, entertainment, and education swung into action to create the entirely manufactured global menace of “terrorism.” Fourteen years after 9/11, this massive fraud is finally being dragged to the surface.
4. The Deception of Radical Islamic Fundamentalism: The age-old “divide and conquer” machinations were applied in the 9/11 fraud. Americans used to have a kind regard for the Muslim faith, but the psychological warfare invented deep suspicions and fear of Muslims as being violent madmen. This warfare continues with the clique-created and funded ISIS being instructed to carry out the most vile acts in their military operations simply to perpetuate the fraudulent characterization of Muslims.
5. The Deception of Domestic Terrorists, Constitutionalists, Sovereign Citizens, and Right-Wing Extremists are manufactured by the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI as both agencies entrap targets and encourage them to commit criminal acts meant to distract and confuse the American public.
6. The Deception of Lone Gunmen and Bombers creating the false aura of fear, uncertainty, and doubt in the public mind, when one after another of this incidences are proving to be staged by members of the Israeli Trojan Horse network within the DHS the FBI. The American people are now wise to this fake phenomenon as demonstrated by the immediate reaction of Charleston, S.C. residents to marched together to defeat race riot agitation. The public also has read about George Soros, the criminal provocateur, who spend $33 million to organize outside protestors to come into Ferguson, Missouri during demonstrations by local residents and to provide funding for Black Lives Matter group for his own agenda to accelerate violence against police across America.
What Is the Nature of This Psychological Warfare Weapon Used To Produce Relentless, Non-Stop Deceptions on a National and Global Scale?
This “psyops” weapon lays down an endless barrage of lies, disinformation, distractions, and false narratives. Its main components are intertwined and consist of all the mainstream media, nearly all education sources, and nearly all entertainment sources, which have long ago been taken over and used to create a high wall of false reality that surrounds us and blocks out nearly all alternative information.
The net effect of this psyops weapon laying down its heavy, endless barrage is to separate us from external reality and lay the seeds for mass psychosis, as well as much hoped-for national and personal identity change toward servitude in the clique’s feudal one-world government fantasy.
The Original Source of the Clique’s Psychological Warfare Operations: The Tavistock Institute in London
Americans know practically nothing about the clique’s unparalleled proficiency in combining media, entertainment, and education to create a psychological warfare weapon of extraordinary power. Accordingly, you may have a hard time accepting the existence of this compartment of the clique’s organizational structure surface. Nonetheless, my research indicates the existence a Tavistock Institute headquartered at 30 Tabernacle Street in London. My research indicates that Dr. John Coleman is a reliable source on the subject of the Tavistock Institute. He was a British intelligence officer for the British MI6 until he left to write a body of work consisting of eight books and many monographs about the power structure of the world. In this clip he talks about the Committee of 300 at the top. See (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCzR7NCeMYA) I have found that his work is supported by the same level of substantial research and real world connections as that of the Executive Intelligence Review, which is also well-respected.
In his book, Tavistock Institute of Human Relations—Shaping the Moral, Spiritual, Cultural, Political and Economic Decline of the United States of America (2005), Dr. Coleman states the following:
“The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations was unknown to the people of the United States before I exposed its existence in my 1969 monograph. Up to that time, Tavistock had successfully retained its secretive role in shaping the affairs of the United States, its government and its people since its early beginning in London, in 1913 at Wellington House. (pull up: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wellington_House) Tavistock began as a propaganda-creating and disseminating organization centered at Wellington House, where the original organization was put together, with the intent of shaping a propaganda center that would break down the stiff public resistance being encountered to the looming war (WWI) between Britain and Germany. The project was given to the Harmsworth brothers, Lord Rothermere and Lord Northcliffe; and their mandate was to produce an organization capable of manipulating public opinion and directing that manufactured opinion down the desired pathway to support for a declaration of war by Great Britain against Germany.” (this is an example of “fomenting war.”)
“Funding was provided by the British royal family, and later by the Rothschilds to whom Lord Northcliffe was related through marriage. Arnold Toynbee was later selected as Director of Future Studies at the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA). Two Americans, Walter Lippmann and Edward Bernays, were appointed to handle the manipulation of British and American public opinion in preparation for the entry of the United States into WWI, and to brief and direct President Woodrow Wilson, while Toynbee concentrated on changing British public opinion. From a somewhat crude beginning, Wellington House grew into an organization that was to shape the destiny of German, Britain and more especially the United States; a highly sophisticated organization able to manipulate and create public opinion through what is commonly termed, ‘mass brainwashing.’ In 1921, Wellington House operations were transferred to the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations…..During the course of its evolvement, Tavistock expanded in size and ambition…….In this endeavor the members of the board consulted with the British royal family and obtained the approval of the ‘Olympians’ (the inner core of the Committee of 300) to formulate a strategy (to foment WWII). Funding was provided by the monarchy, the Rothschilds, the Milner Group and the Rockefeller family trusts. In preparation for changing and reshaping public opinion for the second time in less than twelve years, by unanimous consent of the board, Spengle’s massive book Decline of the West: Volume I, Form and Actuality (1945) was adopted as the blueprint for a new working model to bring about the decline and fall of Western civilization necessary to create and establish a New World Order inside a One World Government.”
Coleman’s study of the Tavistock Institute sheds light on the clique’s installation of Woodrow Wilson as President of the United States (1913-1921) and the causes of the current diminished condition of America’s middle class. He wrote:
“The resounding success of Wellington House and its enormous influence on the course of American history began before 1913. Wilson had spent almost a year tearing down the protective trade tariffs that had defended the American domestic markets from being overwhelmed by ‘free trade,’ essentially the practice of allowing cheap British goods made with cheap labor in India, to flood the American market.” Remember that governments protect their key domestic industries from that too much foreign competition by imposing tariffs (fees) on imports in those sensitive industries.
“On October 12, 1913 Wilson signed a bill that was the beginning of the end of the unique American middle class….The bill was described as a measure to ‘adjust tariffs,” but it would have been accurate to describe it as a bill to ‘destroy tariffs.’”
“Such was the hidden power of Wellington House that the vast majority of the American people accepted this lie, not knowing or realizing that it was the death knell for American commerce that would eventually lead to NAFTA, GATT and the World Trade Organization (WTO) (these are international trade treaties and a fraudulent global organization that weakened the American economy and the American middle class). Even more astonishing was the acceptance of the Federal Income Tax Act that was passed on September 5, 1913, to replace trade tariffs as the source of revenue for the Federal Government. A tax on income is a Marxist doctrine not found in the U.S. Constitution anymore than the Federal Reserve Bank is found in the Constitution.”
This examination of the propaganda and psychological warfare produced by the Tavistock Institute reveals a core deception, namely its effort to conceal its actual objective of a creating a feudal one-world government under the control of a tiny, elite clique and mask it as a socialistic form of government, namely, a classless, stateless society based on common ownership of resources. All three Tavistock schemes were misrepresented as socialistic, “for the common good” changes, which were contrary to American principles established in the U.S. Constitution. The three schemes were:
- Breaking down nation-state protections such as removing tariffs in the name of “free trade” of commerce for all the world’s populations working in common.
- The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 as protecting the world’s financial system (America’s financial system, included) from violent swings and financial panics.
- The Revenue Act of 1913 as an example of a natural initiative of everyone pitching in to cover the operational costs of government.
These fundamental Tavistock schemes were steps to prepare America for an undisclosed purpose and they shed light on the comment made to Norman Dodd, the Director of Research of the Reece Committee by Rowan Gaither, head of the Ford Foundation in 1953:
“The substance was to the effect that we should make every effort to so alter life in the United States as to make possible a comfortable merger with the Soviet Union.” (the clique-controlled Ford Foundation has been an integral participant in constructing the New World Order)
How Effective Is Tavistock In Propaganda and Psychological Warfare?
Coleman states that America has been a primary target of the clique-controlled Tavistock Institute and its Wellington House predecessor since the early 1900s and it has conditioned the American population to participation in every war since World War I. Coleman also states that the Tavistock Institute has used psychological warfare to weaken American principles, morality, and solidarity. How is this carried out? (Please slow down and absorb these Tavistock Institute revelations)
“The Tavistock Clinic in London was where Sigmund Freud had settled when he arrived from Germany……Tavistock Institute was established…for the purposes of mind control and public opinion-making, and to establish, on a carefully-examined scientific basis, at what point the human mind would break down under subjection to prolonged bouts of psychological distress……Tavistock’s chief theoretician, Dr. Kurt Lewin (right), came to the United States to organize the Harvard Psychological Clinic, the MIT Research Center for Group Dynamics, the Institute of Social Research at the University of Michigan……Moreover, a large number of influential people at top policy levels were trained in Dr. Lewin’s theory of topological psychology, which is to this day the most advanced method of behavior modification brainwashing.”
In what you read next, I suggest you open your mind to the possibility that all Americans—including you, our next generation—have been the target of Lewin’s deep behavior modification program.
“Tavistock’s ‘Long Range Penetration and Inner Directional Conditioning’ developed by Dr. Kurt Lewin…is primarily a program where thought control is practiced on mass groups…..The Lewin doctrine is not easy for the layman to follow. Basically, Lewin said that all psychological phenomena occur in a domain defined as psychological phase space. This space is composed of two interdependent fields, the environment and the self.
“The concept of controlled environment arose from the study that if you have a fixed-personality (one susceptible to being predictably profiled), and if you want to elicit from this personality a particular type of behavior, then all you have to do is control the third variable of the equation and thus produce the desired behavior. This was the norm in social-psychology formulas. MI6 uses it in almost every type of situation involving negotiations, army counterinsurgency operations, and labor negotiations. And diplomatic negotiations used it apparently until the 1980s.”
“After 1960, Tavistock changed the equation by placing greater emphasis on the technique of controlled environment, not the behavior, but the desired personality. What Lewin set out to accomplish was far more drastic and permanent; altering the deeper structures of human personalities. In short, what Lewin succeeded in doing was to move beyond ‘behavior modification’ to ‘identity change.’ (slow down—let this sink in)
This is where you have to dig in and exercise your introspection. Suspend your disbelief for a moment and consider that we all may be surrounded by a high wall of engineered false reality much like the film “Matrix” portrayed. In what ways, if any, has your behavior, and perhaps even your identity, been changed by this false reality?
“Identity change was adopted by the nations of the world. Nations worked to acquire a ‘new personality’ that would change the way the world looked at them. The theory relied upon the original formulations of two Tavistock theoreticians, Dr. William Sargent’s theory in his Battle for the Mind–A Physiology of Conversion and Brainwashing (1997), and Kurt Lewin’s own work on “personality regression.”
“Lewin observed that:
‘…the inner self of the individual displays certain reactions when under tension from the environment. When there is no tension, then the normal inner self of a person is well differentiated, balanced multifaceted, versatile….When a reasonable amount of tension is applied from the environment, then all the various abilities and faculties of the inner self go on alert, ready for effective action. But, when an intolerable amount of tension is applied, then this geometry collapses into a blinded, undifferentiated soup; a primitive, a regressed personality. The person is reduced to an animal; the highly differentiated and versatile abilities disappear. The controlled environment takes over the personality.’”
“It will come as no small surprise to learn that Lewin and his team founded the Stanford Research Center, the Wharton School of Economics, MIT, and the National Institute of Mental Health among scores of other institutions fondly believed to be ‘American’ institutions. During the course of years, the Federal Government contributed millions upon millions of dollars to Tavistock and its expanded web of interlinking institutions, while corporate America and Wall Street came up with matching amounts. What has come out of this is what Tavistock called ‘a three-system response’ (i.e.) how population groups react to stress resulting from ‘contrived situations’ that become crisis management exercises. What we have in the U.S. and Britain is a government that creates a situation viewed by its citizens as a crisis, and government then manages that ‘crisis.’ An example of a ‘contrived situation’ was the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941. The attack on Pearl Harbor was ‘contrived’ as previously explained herein with the transfer of Rockefeller cash to Richard Sorge the master spy, and then to a member of the imperial family to prompt Japan to fire the first shots so that the Roosevelt administration could take the United States to war…..Tavistock played an enormous role in crafting the massive wave of anti-Japanese propaganda that swept the United States into the war in Europe via war against Japan.”
Here the “intrigue within the intrigue” was to contrive a war with Japan as a means to pull the American public, against its will, into joining the war in Europe, already fomented by the clique of foreign banking families, to serve its purposes to deal with its arch-rivals, i.e. by defeating Germany and substantially weakening Russia.
“Another example is the more recent Gulf War when the hue and cry was raised about Iraq’s alleged stocks of nuclear and chemical weapons, the so-called ‘weapons of mass destruction’ (WMDs)…..In short, the two Western leaders (Bush, Jr. and Blair) were caught out in a web of lies…..(and with) at least 1 million Iraqis and more than 3,800 American servicemen dead and 25,999 wounded….with the cost…..as of October 2005 exceeding $550 billion…..a state of affairs that demonstrates the power of the Tavistock Institute’s long range penetration and inner conditioning’ treatment of the American people, that would cause them docilely to accept such a turgid, horror-filled situation without ever taking to the streets in rage. On the other hand, the American people may very well be going through one of the three phases of what Dr. Fred Emery, at one time the senior psychiatrist at Tavistock, described as social environmental turbulence.”
That “social environmental turbulence” is exactly the phenomenon the global public, and in particular, the American public, are experiencing right now. See if this following explanation provides an insight about our current situation.
‘Large population groups manifest the following symptoms when subjected to conditions of violent social changes, stress and turbulence which can be divided into well-defined categories. Superficiality is the condition that manifests itself when the threatened population group reacts by adopting shallow sloganeering, which they attempt to pass off as ideals.’ (the slogan “Support Our Troops” masking our “preemptive wars.”)
“Very little ‘ego investment’ takes place making the first phase a ‘maladaptive response’ because, as Emery stated, ‘the cause of the crisis is not isolated and identified and the crisis and tension is not abated, but continues for as long as the controllers want it to last.”
“The second phase of the crisis reaction (since the crisis is continuing), is fragmentation, a condition in which panic strikes, social cohesion falls apart with the result that very small groups form and attempt to protect themselves from the crisis with little or no regard for the expense or cost to other fragmented, small groups. This phase Emery calls passive maladaptation, while still failing to identify the cause of the crisis.” (credible reports, or actual events, of bank runs, food shortages, radiation contamination, hyperinflation, infectious diseases, economic collapse)
“The third phase is when the victims turn away from the source of the induced crisis and the resulting tension. They take fantasy trips of internal migration, introspection and obsession with self. This is what Tavistock calls disassociation and self realization. Emery goes on to explain that the passive maladaptation responses are now coupled with active maladaptive responses. Emery states that over the past 50 years, experiments in applied social psychology and resultant ‘crisis management’ have taken over all aspects of life in America and the results are stored in the computers in major ‘think tanks’ such as Stanford University. The scenarios are taken out, used and revised from time to time and, according to Tavistock, the scenarios are in operation at the present time.”
Translated this means that Tavistock has the majority of the American people profiled and brainwashed. If any part of the American public is ever able to identify the cause of the crises that have washed over this nation in the past seventy years, the social engineering structure build by Tavistock will come crashing down. But that has not yet happened. Tavistock continues to drown the American public in its sea of created public opinion Let’s call it a ‘high wall of false reality.’ But here is a paradox: failing to discover the cause of crises confines us to Emery’s maladaptation phases, but when the actual cause of the crisis is presented, the majority of the general public will intensely ridicule it and will attempt to shut down any rational discourse that contradicts the false reality. My research indicates this is a programmed response engineered by Tavistock.
The Tavistock Institute’s Contribution to the Clique’s Playbook
My research indicates that the clique of families operates from a standard playbook that goes far back to the Roman Empire and has been perfected ever since by Venetians, Genoese, Byzantines and others of later European monarchies and then perfected by the practices of the British Empire. Definitions of Machiavellian behavior in most dictionaries use expressions such as ‘Byzantine intrigues’ or ‘he has the most Byzantine mind in politics’. There was a reason.
In my description of the clique’s standard playbook, I summarize it by referring only to massive bribery, coercion, violence and assassination. The Tavistock Institute contributes much more detail to the playbook and it could truly be called byzantine, i.e. reflecting literally millenniums of experience in grand deception and population control. According the clique’s standard playbook includes the following tools of their trade by general category:
- Maintenance of Strict Secrecy: The strict secrecy of the existence of the clique of families and their concealed schemes is one of Tavistock Institute’s most impressive skills. It is accomplished by:
- Creation of a high wall of false reality by strict control over all media, all education, and all entertainment; in other words, maximum information control that is beyond the comprehension of the general public.
- Strong repression of the occasional emergence of critical thought expressed in public, hammered down by bloviating accusations of being a “conspiracy theorist.”
- Creation of “secret societies” to recruit clique minions, such as The Order of Skull and Bones.
- Within that high wall of this false reality a fraudulent belief is constructed to suggest that war, famine, pestilence, political upheavals, assassinations, large scale corruption, looting, and the like are a natural part of life, in the same category as unavoidable weather events and not the intentional work of a concealed group of criminals.
- To disseminate information through its propaganda branches—media, entertainment, and education—to present fraudulent perspectives as if they were natural, evolutionary “changes in the times,” e.g., (i) globalization; (ii) the American economy “advancing” from a manufacturing-based to an “information-based economy;” and (iii) “trickle-down” economics.
- To disseminate information through its propaganda branches to bring about public acceptance of war in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan.
- To create a new mass fear (terrorism) that secretly facilitates concealed clique schemes, i.e., the fraudulent 9/11 attack on the World Trade buildings in New York City. Pull up: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgM6hjNedE0
- To secretly orchestrate a fraudulent series of Arab Spring uprisings to overthrow troublesome dictators to solidify clique control of the Middle East.
- To secretly send clique-controlled mercenary forces in Syria to attack the Syrian government and to disseminate fraudulent information through the clique’s propaganda branches of Syrian government atrocities (which atrocities were actually committed by the clique-controlled mercenary forces) as a stepping stone to fomenting a war between the U.S. military vs. Russia and China.
- To gain concealed control of the nomination and election processes of nation-states.
- To engineer concealed control of nation-state financial affairs by attaching clique private banks (mis-named as “central banks”) to nation-state banking systems .
The takeover of American education by the Carnegie Endowment and Rockefeller Foundation beginning in the early 1900s: (i) to shift the thinking of our next generations away from American principles of individual rights and government by consent of the governed and (ii) to dumb down education by corruption of curriculum, teaching methodologies, and the subverted organization of the learning process.
Orchestrated shocks to the American public: the assassinations of the Kennedy brothers and Martin Luther King; fomenting and prolonging the Vietnam war (1965-1975); the “controlled disintegration” of the American economy which is now in its advanced stage.
The media barrage of false and twisted information designed to confuse, disorient and disempower the American public, including orchestrated inflammatory issues such as liberal vs. conservative beliefs; abortion vs. right to life; gun rights vs. gun control; gay marriage vs. traditional values; socialism vs. capitalism; big government vs. individual responsibility; Social Security/Medicare vs. deficit spending, and so on. This tactic of “divide and conquer” has its time-honored place in the clique’s standard playbook.
Massive bribery and coercion in the nomination and election of American officials that undermines the American public’s sense of solidarity.
Fraudulent polling that misleads the public and undermines confidence.
The concealed selection and grooming of clique minions to take the highest positions in American government who are simply fraudulent figures with no legitimacy. There are countless examples of the American public observing this illegitimacy.
The federal government’s inadequate response to Hurricane Katrina in which an entirely inexperienced lawyer in charge of FEMA had to be replaced by the head of the U.S. Coast Guard.
The grooming of Barack Obama for president by the Rockefellers in which his birth certificate and Selective Service documents have been found to be forged, and his Columbia University diploma and transcript are unavailable. The public knows that important information is being suppressed. And Obama’s heavy reliance on teleprompters as well as his inadequate performance in debates now suggests that he is a fraudulent and inadequate figure being told what to say and do on behalf of the clique. The very idea of a Rockefeller-delivered fake U.S. president is a corruption well within the definition of psychological warfare.
The orchestration of “random shootings” by seemingly deranged individuals has become a subject of public attention. In other words, beginning with the public awareness that President Kennedy was not killed by a lone gunman, as was officially claimed, there has been a growing awareness that these more recent shootings may actually be arranged to cause general fear and a sense of public disempowerment. The CIA’s MK-ULTRA Project of testing and developing drug-impaired, mind-controlled persons has provided considerable support to this growing public perception.
Orchestrating False Flag Crises
After its probable involvement with the fraudulent 9/11 attack, the Tavistock Institute’s contribution to the clique’s playbook would not be complete without its capacity to orchestrate false flag crises that spread fear in the minds of whole populations as justification for installing martial law, including, but not limited to:
Orchestrating hyperinflation by the reckless use of more “quantitative easing.”
Orchestrating a fake, world-wide food shortage.
Orchestrating a fake series of deadly weather events, using HAARP technology.
Orchestrating an epidemic.
Setting off a tactical nuclear device in a heavily populated area of the U.S.
The most telling part of Dr. Lewin’s work is this commentary which needs repeating. Coleman wrote:
“After 1960, Tavistock changed the equation by placing greater emphasis on the technique of controlled environment not the behavior, but the desired personality. What Lewin set out to accomplish was for more drastic and permanent: altering the deeper structures of human personalities. In short, what Lewin succeeded in doing was to move beyond ‘behavior modification’ to ‘identity change.’
Lewin observed that:
‘…the inner self of the individual displays certain reactions when under tension from the environment. When there is no tension, then the normal inner self of a person is well differentiated, balanced multifaceted, versatile….When a reasonable amount of tension is applied from the environment, then all the various abilities and faculties of the inner self go on alert, ready for effective action.’
But, when an intolerable amount of tension is applied, then this geometry collapses into a blinded, undifferentiated soup; a primitive, a regressed personality. The person is reduced to an animal; the highly differentiated and versatile abilities disappear. The controlled environment takes over the personality.’”
“It is this Lewin ‘technique’ that is used on the captives held at the Guantanamo Bay prison camp in defiance of international law and the U.S. Constitution. This gross misconduct of the Bush administration at the camp is beyond the pale of normal Western Christian civilization, and its acceptance by a docile American public, might be the first sign that the American people have been so changed by Tavistock’s ‘long range penetration and inner-direction conditioning,’ that they are now ready to descend to the level of the New World Order in a One World Government where such barbaric ‘treatment’ will be regarded as normal and accepted without protest.”
But before we contemplate the possibility of this barbaric eventuality, let’s stop and consider the impact of the Tavistock Institute’s past and current efforts to apply considerable tension to our environment in America.
As surreal as this topic seems, we need to look at ourselves and the American public in general for any signs of identity change.
We know what earlier tensions have caused: the rising divorce rate; the advent of two-income families and the impact on family life; marrying later; the rising income inequality; and the disintegration of the middle class.
New tensions affecting identity?: the economic plunge, the colossal level of corporate fraud, over-the-top political gridlock and corruption, a deep suspicion of the media, the lack of public outrage—-all suggesting a growing public passivity and shock fatigue. Is identity change among Americans underway?
“Tavistock was founded as a research center for British Special Intelligence Service (SIS) by its founder Brig. Gen. John Rawlings Rees (right)…..It was Rees who launched the method of controlling political campaigns, as well as mind control techniques, which continue to this very day…..Lewin fled Germany when it became apparent that the (Nazi party) would take control. Lewin rose to become Tavistock’s director in 1932. He played a major role in preparing the American people for entry into WWII.”
“What was it that made the Rees method so successful? Basically, it was this: The same psychotherapy techniques used to cure a mentally sick individual could be applied in the opposite direction. It could also be used to make healthy people become mentally ill. Rees began his long series of experiments in the 1930s using British Army recruits as test cases. From there Rees progressed to perfect mass brainwashing techniques, which he was later to apply to countries slated for change. One such country was the United States, which remains the focus of attention of Tavistock. Rees began applying his behavior modifications techniques against the American people in 1946.”
“Few, if any, realized the extreme threat which Rees posed.”
“The British Army Psychological Warfare Bureau was set up at Tavistock through secret agreements with (Winston) Churchill, well before Churchill became prime minister. The agreements gave the British Special Operations Executive, commonly known as the SOE, full control over the policies of the U.S. Armed Forces, acting through civilian channels, and which invariably, became official U.S. Government policy. That agreement is still firmly in place, as unacceptable to patriotic Americans today as it was when established. It was the discovery of this agreement that led General Eisenhower to issue his historic warning about powers accumulated in the hands of the ‘military industrial complex.’
So that we fully understand the influence of Tavistock in the daily political, social, religious and economic life of Americans, allow me to explain that it was Kurt Lewin, the second in command who was responsible for founding the following American institutions, many of whom were responsible for making profound changes in U.S. foreign and local policies:
The Harvard Psychological Clinic
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
The Committee on National Morale
National Defense Resources Council
The National Institute for Mental Health
The National Training Laboratories
The Stanford Research Center
The Wharton School of Economics
The New York Police Department
The FBI (British subject, Major Louis Mortimer Bloomfield ran the FBI’s Division Five counter-intelligence during WWII)
The CIA (The British participated in the formation of America’s Office of Strategic Services (OSS) in 1942, which became the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in 1947.”
“….every aspect of America’s way of life, its customs, its traditions, its history, are examined to see if they can be subjected to change. Every aspect of our psychological and physiological life is constantly under scrutiny at Tavistock’s U.S. institutions. Their ‘change agents’ work tirelessly to change our way of life and make it look as (if) such changes are merely ‘changing times’ to which we must adapt. These forced changes are to be found in politics, religion, music, the way news is manufactured and reported, the style of delivery of the news readers. The outcome, the net result of these experimental programs determine how and where we shall live in the present and the future, how we will react to stressful situations in our national and personal life, and how our thinking on a national level regarding education, religion, morals, economics and politics can be channelled in the ‘right direction.’”
“We, the People,” have been and are being endlessly studied at Tavistock’s institutions. We are dissected, profiled, thought-read, and the data entered into computer data banks for the purposes of shaping and planning how we will react to planned future shocks and stressful situations. All this is done without our consent and in gross violation of our constitutional rights to privacy.”
Another perspective of Tavistock is described by L. Wolfe in 1997 in The American Almanac:
“Rees and a cadre group of Freudian and neo-Freudian psychiatrists, applied wartime experience of psychological collapse, to create theories about how such conditions of breakdown could be induced, absent the terror of war.
“The result was a theory of mass brainwashing, involving group experience, that could be used to alter the values of individuals, and through that, induce, over time, changes in the axiomatic assumptions that govern society.”
“It appears that the central focus of the concealed power ’s Tavistock organization was to develop means by which to break down the psychological resiliency of the individual, which extended to weakening the family unit, religious faith, national patriotism, and personal honor.”
This effort became know generically as “behavioral science,” and even extended into exploring ways to alter sexual behavior to further a sense of personal detachment from human bonding.”
The Tavistock Institute’s Propaganda/Psychological Warfare Channels in America
While this may appear to be tedious, it is vitally important that we grasp that the clique of families fully control the channels which the Tavistock Institute use to surround the American public with a high wall of false reality.
There are three channels: the (mainstream) media, American education, and the American entertainment industry:
An important part of this presentation of how the world actually works is that there are specific individuals who are key players in the tightly controlled Tavistock channels of propaganda and psychological warfare aimed at the American people.
We must get past the faceless networks and organizations that maintain the high wall of false reality and identify the actual individuals responsible for the gross deception and disorientation to which the American public is subjected on a daily basis.
The CIA Gives the Term “Rogue” a Whole New Meaning; Media Control, Psychological Operations (PsyOps) and Mind-Control
Before we delve into the deeds and substantial misdeeds of the Central Intelligence Agency, please understand that it is more than likely that the clique had complete control over a cabal of senior CIA personnel (referred to as The Secret Team) from the CIA’s inception in 1947. There were far too many circumstances in which CIA carried out operations as if they were working for some other authority than the U.S. government. Just a few oddities will suffice to explain this supposition:
- The CIA routinely ignored legal instructions from the U.S. Congress.
- The CIA routinely ignored demands from Congress for documents and other information about its activities.
- When the U.S. Congress cut off funds to the CIA to prevent it from continuing certain disapproved activities, the CIA developed its own source of funding—illegal narcotics trafficking—which entailed moving narcotics from growing areas in a region encompassing parts of Myanmar, Laos, and Thailand (The Golden Triangle) and selling the goods in America and elsewhere.
- In another arrangement, to cover its operating expenses, the CIA smuggled narcotics out of Nicaragua and sold them, in some cases, to drug dealers in Los Angeles.
- Without authority, the CIA sold large quantities of weapons to Iran, and sent the cash paid by the Iranians to the Contras, a band of mercenaries who the CIA was paying to overthrow the Nicaragua government.
- When President Kennedy asked the files on Extraterrestrial Activity, the CIA Director, Allen Dulles, refused to comply, saying that the President was not cleared for that level of classified documents. The President fired Dulles, but was assassinated before the files became available.
- The Illegal CIA Operation Mockingbird: Full Conversion of the U.S. and Worldwide Media To a Coordinated Psychological Warfare Weapon Against America and Other Targeted Nation-States.
- Another “tell” surfaced in 1948 when a tightening of U.S. and worldwide media control was orchestrated by a fraudulent shift in the use of America’s Central Intelligence Agency. There was an authorization by Congress to form an “Office of Policy Coordination (OPC),” directed by Wall Street lawyer Frank Wisner, from which covert operations were to be concentrated, which included:
“propaganda, economic warfare, preventive direct action (sabotage, anti-sabotage, demolition, and evacuation measures), subversion against hostile states, including assistance to underground resistance groups, and support of indigenous anti-communist elements in threatening countries of the free world.”
This was the opening created by the clique to slip in entirely un-American and unconstitutional use of the media as a false reality propaganda machine that grew, despite several Congressional investigations and official “cease and desist” directives from Congress. Frank Wisner referred to the illegal Operation Mockingbird as his “Mighty Wurlitzer,” after the giant pipe organs built and installed in theaters across the U.S. that acted as a one-man orchestra to accompany the first silent movies and carried the audiences along in emotional harmony with the script of the movie. Let’s substitute key words to show how the Mighty Wurlitzer worked: it carried the audiences (read the American public) along in emotional harmony with the script of each movie (read the high wall of false reality). Hugh Wilford’s The Mighty Wurlitzer: How the CIA Played America, describes the psychological warfare to which the American public was subjected by the clique, using their “pipe organ,”—the CIA’s total control over the American media and the media’s complicity in presenting a false reality to the American public. (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird)
The CIA began building its false reality machine by, first, recruiting foreign media owners, editors, managers, reporters and writers to disseminate CIA propaganda. But, covertly, this effort was expanded, based on a fraudulent cover story of anti-communist patriotism to the recruitment of: (i) American owners, editors, and reporters of news organizations; (ii) American magazine owners, editors and writers; (iii) American book publishers, editors and writers; (iv) American owners, managers and newscasters of television and radio stations; and (v) American movie studio owners in Hollywood, California.
From 1953 forward, a very large number of media figures began participated in the false reality propaganda effort, some of whom were induced by covert money, gifts and/or coercion. The most notable organizations to join the illegal, un-American, and un-Constitutional Operation Mockingbird were the Washington Post, the Washington Star, the New York Times, Reuters, Hearst Newspapers, United Press International, Newsweek magazine, the New York Herald Tribune, the Miami News, the Chattanooga Times, the Christian Science Monitor, Scripps-Howard News Service, the Louisville Courier-Journal, Copley News Services, Time magazine, Life magazine, ABC, NBC, CBS, RKO Pictures, Paramount Pictures, and Twentieth Century Fox. Key individuals who joined Operation Mockingbird included Philip Graham, Henry Luce, William Paley, Ben Bradlee, Arthur Hays Sulzberger, Fred Friendly, John Ford, Cecil B. DeMille, Darryl Zanuck, Howard Hughes, James Reston, Joe Alsop, Stewart Alsop, Drew Pearson, Jack Anderson, Walter Lippmann, Ed Morrow, Hal Hendrix, Barry Bingham Sr., James Copley, and Joseph Harrison. A number of these individuals were already long associated with and worked for the clique, including Walter Lippmann, William Paley, Arthur Hays Sulzberger, Joe and Stewart Alsop, Henry Luce, just to name a few.
Efforts to rein in the CIA’s un-Constitutional practices began in 1955 when President Eisenhower formed the 5412 Committee to define approved covert activities. By 1961, the CIA was covertly responsible for articles by Virginia Prewitt and editorials by Time-Life that challenged President Kennedy’s position on Cuba. In a series of episodes, the CIA attempted, and sometimes succeeded, in interfering with the publication of books and release of documentaries such as Invisible Government, by David Wise and Thomas Ross; The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia, by Alfred W. McCoy; and a documentary by Edward Yates, among others.
The CIA’s un-Constitutional activities inside the United States during the 1961-1968 period finally came to the surface in the findings of the 1975 Church Investigations under Congress’ “Select Committee To Study Government Operations With Respect To Intelligence Activities.” These findings included:
Over 50 U.S. journalists were employed directly by the Agency (CIA). Many more maintained close relationships and were being paid regularly for their services or received occasional gifts and reimbursements.
Because the CIA would not provide the names of its media agents or the names of the media organizations with which they are connected, and because CIA payments to media sources were undocumented, there was a presumption that the known degree of the CIA’s subversion of the American media was just the tip of the iceberg. (Carl Bernstein, who reported on the Watergate scandal, claimed in a Rolling Stone Magazine article in 1977 that over a 25-year period over 400 American journalists secretly carried out CIA assignments.)
In the Church Investigation’s followup “Otis Pike Report,” the concern was expressed that the CIA’s practice of undocumented expenditures could be a sign of financial corruption, which was later borne out in the CIA’a drug-running to finance the illegal Iran/Contra operation.
E. Howard Hunt of the CIA arrange for books to be reviewed by certain writers in the national press. And he arranged for a CIA writer under contract to write a hostile review in the New York Times of a book troublesome to the CIA.
The Church Congressional Investigation concluded that:
“In examining the CIA’s past and present use of the U.S. media, the Committee finds two reasons for concern. The first is the potential, inherent in covert media operations, for manipulating or incidentally misleading the American public. The second is the damage to the credibility and independence of a free press, which may be caused by covert relationships with the U.S. journalists and media organizations.”
Please give some consideration to the possibility that the clique controls a sufficient portion of the U.S. media—through covert bribery and coercion and by the direct concentrated ownership of the media by the clique’s transnational corporations—to have gained control of public opinion in America.
In other words, from an intelligence service that was formed after World War II, the CIA has been corrupted—as so many other American institutions—and has become an important part of the construction and maintenance of a false reality.
Thus, in the 1961-1968 period, the Kennedy/Johnson Administrations had to contend with not just a rogue CIA, but a CIA entrenched inside the U.S. government—much like the clique’s private bank— Federal Reserve—that routinely worked against the social and economic interests of the American people.
The CIA’s Illegal MK-ULTRA Project: Going Far Deeper Into Psychological Warfare
The April 1953 creation of the MK-ULTRA Project was an illegal, covert CIA operation running from 1953 through the late 1960s, focusing on the use of LSD and other narcotics for the purposes of mind control and illegal and violent human actions guided by hypnosis, including assassination, torture, and interrogation techniques. The Project was funded in part by the Rockefeller Foundation and the Ford Foundation. More than 150 individually funded research sub-projects were sponsored by the Project. Investigative efforts by Congress were hampered when, in 1975, the CIA Director Richard Helms ordered the destruction of all the relevant files. Speaking from the U.S. Senate, Senator Ted Kennedy stated:
“The Deputy Director of the CIA revealed that over thirty universities and institutions were involved in an ‘extensive testing and experimentation’ program which included covert drug tests on unwitting citizens ‘at all social levels, high and low, native Americans and foreign.’ Several of these tests involved the administration of LSD to ‘unwitting subjects in social situations.’ At least one death, that of Dr. Olson, resulted from these activities. The (CIA) itself acknowledged that these tests made little scientific sense. The agents doing the monitoring were not qualified scientific observers.”
While the CIA officially claims that it has ended the Project, Wikipedia, using CIA veteran and critic Victor Marchetti as a source, states:
“….that the CIA routinely conducts disinformation campaigns and that CIA mind control research continued. In a 1977 interview, Marchetti specifically called the CIA claim that MK-ULTRA was abandoned a ‘cover story.’ This CIA practice of keeping their operations and the funding sources secret from Congress, and, if necessary, from the President and Administration officials, was a serious problem for the Kennedy Administration and the Johnson Administration because, essential, the CIA had already turned into a “rogue” agency with no accountability. Even when funding to the CIA was cut off by Congress, it could receive funding from narcotics operations, from corporate foundations like the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations, and “siphoning funds intended from the Marshall Plan. This use of CIA resources to develop mind control of populations is a natural extension of psychological warfare applied to populations, their governments and their institutions since the formation in the early 1920s of their Tavistock Institute in London led by John Rawlings Rees.”
Accordingly, the information you receive from your position inside this high wall of false reality is not just passive messages to keep you grazing; it includes a powerful and steady stream of psychological warfare coming at you from all angles. What psychological warfare? Well, how about assassinations of our high public officials? Multiple wars? Bribing all U.S. officeholders to run the government like a theater of the absurd? Engineering financial panics? Getting everyone into debt up to their eyeballs and many losing their homes? Wouldn’t that be psychological warfare? Wearing down the sense of solidarity of the American people, wearing down your belief in government derived from the consent of the governed, wearing down your belief in your individual rights, the loosening of moral standards, the widespread use of narcotics, the excessive sexuality and shock-value depravity displayed in the film industry, and the explosion of Internet pornography, sometimes replacing personal intimacy and loving relationships, wearing down your personal identity, an exploding divorce rate, wearing down your family bonds, wearing down your faith in your religion, wearing down your sense of morality, wearing down your belief in yourself, and wearing down any sense of trust that has always been the most fundamental bond that holds a society together.
That’s psychological warfare. That is a real war being waged on the American people and over a long period of time. Incredible damage and debris has come to the surface that can be recognized by the public. A major impact on us is the perpetual false reality created by the concealed clique’s-controlled media, but there is also a second more deadly weapon in play: it is the Tavistock-designed psychological warfare features used to break down the psychological resiliency of the the American people. As the stress of the psychological warfare expands and intensifies, and as more and more bad economic news looms, and as more and more war threats and violent episodes arise, the American public gives the appearance of apathy no matter how atrocious the rising provocations. The question is asked more and more frequently: when is the American public going to react and demand immediate solutions instead of remaining seemingly passive? One answer is that the public is suffering from massive psychological fatigue and has no energy or passion or indignation left from which to draw the will to fight for their rights. This possibility suggests that American’s are not indifferent, or passive, but rather they are overwhelmed by sensory overload, disinformation, and the sense of a barrage that never seems to end. And the most troubling aspect of this kind of warfare is that the use of psychological warfare on the American people and our next generations has been an attempt to create a phenomenon referred to as “mass psychosis” throughout our society. A psychosis is defined as: “A severe mental disorder in which thought and emotions are so impaired that contact is lost with external reality.”
If You Have Read This Far—-Congratulations!—-You Have Been Presented With An Alternative Perspective Of How The World Actually Works, Which Includes The Existence of America’s Most Deadly Enemy, Namely, The Clique of Foreign, Dynastic Banking Families, Joined By Its Junior Partners: (i) Some of Wealthiest American Eastern Establishment Families, (ii) the Old Line International Narcotics Families, and (iii) the Remaining Royal Families of the Long Feudal Era’s Bygone European Monarchies.
We Now Close This Alternative Perspective With An Explanation Of The “Controlled Disintegration” Wreaked On America and Its Economy By This Most Deadly Foreign Enemy In An Effort To Destroy Our Independence And Return America To Its Earlier Feudal Status By Incorporating It Into The Clique’s One-World Government Fantasy
The Long “Controlled Disintegration” Of America and Its Economy
The best way to grasp the enormous extent of the clique’s “controlled disintegration” efforts is to simply update and revise our Declaration of Independence of 1776, as follows:
A PRELIMINARY FORMAT FOR AMERICA’S UPCOMING SECOND DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE
JULY 4, 2017
When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for a people to take certain actions that may cause concern among fellow world citizens, a decent respect for their opinions requires an explanation for the causes which impel these exertions.
We continue to hold certain truths to be self-evident, that all people are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among a people, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of a people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience has shown, that a people are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of the American people; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to purge their republic form of government of concealed foreign and criminal control. The discovery of a tiny concealed clique of foreign, dynastic British and European banking families using massive bribery and blackmail, deadly violence, and assassination to gain control of the American government and all of America’s vital institutions has resulted in a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over the American people. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.
This concealed clique of foreign, dynastic British and European banking families in the City of London has been discovered to be carrying out a long-planned “controlled disintegration”— disguised by massive fraud—of America, its people, and its economy in the following manner:
1. Bribing Wealthy American Eastern Establishment Families To Secretly Join the Clique as Junior Partners and Commit Crimes Against Humanity and Treasonous Acts Against the American People
Even during the American Revolution, this concealed clique drew under its control a number of disloyal American colonial families of great wealth and later Eastern Establishment families who set forth to secretly betray the United States of America in exchange for profitable commercial ties with Britain, to include participation in the British East India Company’s extraordinarily profitable, worldwide heroin trade as well as later participation in the clique’s expanding global monopoly of the narcotics trade.
2. Using Its Global Monopoly of the Narcotics Trade to Spread Debilitating Addiction and Bring About Personal Disempowerment To Rising Numbers of the American Public and Especially America’s Next Generations
In addition to achieving massive profit-taking through its narcotics monopoly, the concealed clique has carried out a scheme to flood America with narcotics, just as it did to the Chinese population, which precipitated the Opium Wars of 1839-1842 and 1856-1860. The clique-planned flood of narcotics into America began with (i) the engineered influx of Chinese workers in the second half of the 1800s to build the American railroads and serve as a narcotics pipeline, then (ii) during the Prohibition era (1920-1933) when narcotics demand spiked and supply followed along the black-market alcohol channels. Thereafter, the clique worked steadily to weaken America’s next generations and America’s economic productivity with its now well-entrenched narcotics networks.
3. Flooding America’s Cotton-Growing States With African Slaves, Using Its Near Monopoly in International Slave Trade
To further destabilize the American economy and its moral standards, the concealed clique used its vast slavery trade to flood America’s southern states with African slaves and achieve extraordinary profits.
4. Fomenting the War of 1812 To Wreck America’s Finances and Overthrow the American Government
The concealed clique orchestrated the War of 1812 in an attempt to overthrow the American government and Americans referred to the British effort as “America’s Second War of Independence.” The fighting ensued on three fronts: (i) naval battles at sea, (ii) along the U.S./Canadian border against British and allied Indian forces, and in large land battles on the southeastern and Gulf coastlines of America. The British Navy blockaded the Atlantic coast and British Army forces marched inland to engage in pitched battles, which included the British capture of Washington and the burning of certain federal buildings, include the White House.
5. Steadily Gaining Concealed Control of the American Government
By a long, concealed scheme that started immediately after America’s War of Independence, the concealed clique, using a system of deep bribery, blackmail, deadly violence, and assassination, gained control of the nominating and electoral processes at the federal, state and municipal levels of American government. Furthermore, the clique gained concealed control of the American Bar Association, the legal system, control of appointments to the U.S. Supreme Court and permeating down into federal, state and local courts.
6. Fomenting the American Civil War—Attempting To Balkanizing the American Continent—Assassinating President Abraham Lincoln In Retaliation For The Union Victory That Blocked The Break-Up Of The Country and Rejected Clique Banking Control
With its strong financial ties to America’s major southern-states plantation owners, the concealed clique carried out a subversive effort to precipitate a civil war to break America into two antagonistic political entities. The clique arranged for the Union Army to be commanded by clique-controlled General George B. McClellan, who frustrated President Abraham Lincoln by repeatedly not closing with and engaging the Confederate forces. When President Lincoln relieved McClellan, reorganized the Union Army leadership, and oversaw the surrender of the Confederacy, the clique arranged for President Lincoln’s assassination. The clique had arranged for the British and French forces to enter the American Civil War, to gain control of the divided parts, but the Russian Tsar Alexander II insured the Union victory by sending a large Russian fleet to foil the clique’s plan.
7. Constant Efforts To Gain Complete Control of America’s Banking System
Six months after the American Congress ratified the Treaty of Paris on January 14, 1784, which brought to a successful end the American War of Independence, the concealed clique commenced a long scheme to seize control of the banking system of the United States in the following sequence:
The Bank of New York was formed by the clique on June 9, 1784, with the complicity of the treasonous U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton. The Bank of England, which was controlled by the clique, secretly became its major stockholder.
The First Bank of the United States was formed on February 25, 1791, again with the complicity of Alexander Hamilton, who folded the Bank of New York into the First Bank of the United States, thereby positioning the Bank of England in a concealed control position.
The Second Bank of the United States was formed on April 10, 1816, following the end of the First Bank’s charter in March 1811, with the same concealed Bank of England control. The Second Bank was voted out of existence in April 1834 by the U.S. House of Representatives and actions by President Andrew Jackson to end the Second Bank’s destructive banking practices which worked directly against the interests of the American people.
The clique, in concert with the betraying American Eastern Establishment families, secretly fomented a long series of fraudulent financial panics, recessions and other economic crises in 1837, 1857, 1873, 1882-85, 1893 and 1907 for the purpose of: (i) maximizing its rigged stock and bond profit-taking, (ii) conditioning the American people to accept a fraudulent new “central” bank to “stabilize” America’s banking system, and (iii) achieving full control of the U.S. government. This scheme was culminated on December 23, 1913 with the enactment of the Federal Reserve Act by the clique-controlled U.S. Congress and signed into law by clique-controlled President Woodrow Wilson. At that date, the clique gained control of America’s financial resources and, thereby, destroyed its nation-state sovereignty and eliminated the ability of the American people to control their personal and national destinies.
8. Gaining Control of and Subverting American Education
In 1910, the concealed clique, used the American Carnegie family to commence a concealed scheme to gain control over American education. Its aim was to bring to an end the American principles of individual rights and government by the consent of the governed. In its place, the Carnegie family, through its deeply funded foundation that was disguised as a philanthropic institution, aimed to condition America’s next generations to surrender America’s national sovereignty and accept a one-world government. This scheme entailed: (i) the formation of a new set of clique-controlled historians to falsify and rewrite American history and, (ii) carry out the gradual elimination of un-corrupted historians throughout American education by withholding grant money. The Carnegie subversion of education placed a heavy emphasis on dumbing down America’s next generations by the systematic disruption of the learning process in the choice of curricula, textbooks and teaching methodologies.
The Carnegie Foundation (aka the “Carnegie Endowment”) was joined by the Guggenheim Foundation to grant scholarships to its selected academic candidates who were seeking graduate degrees. Furthermore, the Carnegie family formed an alliance with the Rockefeller family to divide these subversive activities, with American education to be under the control of the Rockefeller Foundation, and with the subversion of international education to be controlled by the Carnegie Endowment. Their huge foundations provided the massive funding for this monstrous scheme. The result has been profound damage to American democracy, productivity, and solidarity, as well as to the knowledge base and critical thinking capabilities of America’s next generations.
9. Fomenting World War I and Drawing America Into War Using Deception, Bribery, Blackmail, and Coercion
As Germany grew in industrial power in the late 1800s, it became a rising economic power which the concealed clique planned to demolish and simultaneously make enormous war profits. The clique fomented World War I, which it triggered on July 28th, 1914 with a coalition of British, French, and other European nations aimed at defeating Germany. On April 2nd, 1917, clique-controlled President Woodrow Wilson, who had already signed the illegal and un-Constitutional Federal Reserve Act of 1913, successfully requested a Congressional declaration of war against Germany. An authentic historical account would reveal that Woodrow Wilson was under the sway of American clique minion, “Colonel” Edward Mandell House, who managed Wilson’s political rise from president of Princeton University, to Governor of New Jersey, and on to the Presidency.
10. Gaining Control of, and Subverting, the American Free Press
In March 1915, the concealed clique, using its agent in America, the Eastern Establishment’s Morgan family, launched a scheme to bring the American free press under its control. This scheme was accomplished by the Morgan family using bribery and other forms of coercion to gain control of 25 of the largest American opinion-making newspapers. A clique-controlled editor was furnished to each newspaper to supervise and edit information to create a high wall of false reality around the American public.
The clique culminated its full control of American free press by using the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), which it controlled since its inception in 1947, to execute “Operation Mockingbird.” This operation strengthening the clique’s control over all news outlets to mislead, confuse, and disorient the American people.
11. Subjecting the American People and Other Nation-State Populations To Intense Psychological Warfare
The clique carried out a concealed scheme to build a psychological warfare organization consisting of the clique’s war propaganda Wellington House that evolved to become the Tavistock Institute in the City of London, funded with the intent of shaping a relentless propaganda center that would break down the stiff public resistance to the clique-planned World War I. A part of the Tavistock Institute funding was provided by the betraying Eastern Establishment’s Rockefeller family. In 1953 the clique’s CIA component carried out its MK-ULTRA Project, using over 30 American universities and institutions to help develop the project. This scheme entailed developing a mind-control capability, guided by narcotics and hypnosis to trigger illegal and violent human actions including assassinations, tasking, torture, and interrogation.
On November 18, 1978, the Tavistock Institute-orchestrated experiments undertaken at a Guyana base on the northern coast of South America led to the murder of 909 subjects of these experiments, including over 200 children, and the assassination of U.S. Congressman Leo Ryan of California, who, on behalf of a number of his constituents, appeared at the Guyana base with an entourage and an NBC film crew. The Tavistock Institute orchestrates the treasonous media/entertainment/education apparatus that has subjected America and other nation-states to advanced psychological warfare practices.
12. Engineering the Great Depression of the 1930s
The concealed clique carried out a series of financial manipulations that shifted financial resources from America to Great Britain that were designed to bail Great Britain out of its insolvency. The intended consequence was to severely weaken the expanding American economy and to shatter the social conditions of the American people. This intended consequence was fraudulently named the Great Depression of the 1930, when, in fact, it was an engineered collapse, not an accident of unfortunate economic dynamics.
13. Attempting to Overthrow the American Government During the Early Stage of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Administration As It Was Working Out Its Recovery Plan
While President Roosevelt was constructing New Deal legislation to reel in the runaway criminality of the American corporate and banking sectors, the concealed clique attempted the removal of President Roosevelt and the takeover of the American government. The clique approached Marine General Smedley Butler to head a veterans group of 400,000 men akin to fascist Benito Mussolini’s “Brownshirts” in order to play a paramilitary role in the planned government coup. Instead, General Butler reported the coup plans to the McCormack-Dickstein Congressional Committee. This broke the back of the coup effort, but there were no arrests and the news was swept under the rug due to clique bribery, blackmail, and control of the media. It appears that the engineered economic collapse was part of the clique’s controlled disintegration plan that was set back by the FDR New Deal, which led to full economic recovery. The clique-planned coup appears to have been arranged to thwart the FDR economic recovery.
14. Fomenting World War II and Drawing America Into War Using Deception, Bribery, Blackmail, and Coercion
The concealed clique determined that the spectacular economic recovery of a re-armed Germany and the rise of Russian economic power had to be shattered by a new engineered war. However, there was an intense global anti-war sentiment following World War I, just twenty-six years earlier. The Tavistock apparatus successfully used its full arsenal of psychological warfare to overcome this global resistance to another war. In the case of American anti-war sentiment, the Tavistock Institute orchestrated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. This concealed scheme involved the Rockefeller family providing enormous funding, using Richard Sorge, the master Soviet spy, as the conduit to a member of the Japanese imperial family to prompt Japan to launch the Pearl Harbor attack, which enabled the Roosevelt Administration to take the United States to war. The Tavistock Institute orchestrated waves of of anti-Japanese propaganda that overwhelmed American war resistance and pushed America into war with Japan, and subsequently, with more Tavistock machinations, into war with Germany.
15. Creating the Nation of Israel in 1948 To Become a Clique Base To Protect Its Middle East Oil Reserves and To Create an Israeli Trojan Horse Network To Infiltrate the Governments and Key Institutions of Nation-States Across the World, Particularly in America
The concealed clique has infested America with a termite-like hoard of Israeli operatives, spies, dual-citizen Israeli/American NeoCons, and American officials heavily bribed, blackmailed, and threatened by Israeli control fronts, i.e., the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Accordingly, the U.S. Congress no longer serves the America people and public confidence in the U.S. Congress has fallen to seven (7) percent. This mass infiltration by the clique will be referred to as the Israeli Trojan Horse Network. The NeoCon element of this Israeli Network, along with Saudi Arabia and treasonous American government officials, carried out the 9/11 false flag attack on the World Trade Center in New York City to launch the criminal scheme to shift public attention to a fake narrative referred to as “The War on Terrorism” to justify a series of regime changes in the Middle East.
16. Fomenting the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the Iraq War, the War in Afghanistan, and the Deadly Violence in Georgia, Egypt, Libya, Ukraine, and Syria
The concealed clique had a high incentive to perpetuate a constant flow of wars: (i) it had a fully-developed psychological warfare apparatus to foment wars, (ii) the profit-taking from war loans and weapons sales were one of its best profit-taking sources, and (iii) the wars were orchestrated to carry out the age-old “divide and conquer” geopolitical machinations right out of the clique’s playbook that insured its sustainability. Meanwhile, the clique routinely used the U.S. military to enforce its concealed schemes and insures its global dominance.
17. Gaining Control of the American Entertainment Industry
Using its transnational corporations to gain monopoly control and using its Israeli Trojan Horse Network, the clique orchestrated the infiltration of clique minions into control positions in the American entertainment industry. The clique has undertaken a long, concealed scheme to destroy American moral standards with ever-increasing degenerate programming. The clique-orchestrated consolidation of the entertainment industry culminated in control by just six clique-controlled transnational corporations. To mask its schemes, it intentionally created pedophilia rings and satanic ritual practices as a part of a massive extortion scheme that demanded (i) participation in pedophilia or satanic rituals plus (ii) a heavy cut of all performers’ income in exchange for promises to accelerate their future incomes and careers by the clique’s control over future roles and favored venues. The pedophile rings, satanic rituals, Illuminati member, and other compromising environments were simply tactics used by the clique to entrap the performers for future blackmail operations to keep them under control and squeeze them for more money as they become more successful and more wealthy.
18. Combining the CIA, the Israeli Mossad and the British Secret Intelligence Service to Become a Global Terrorist Organization To Implement the Clique’s Concealed Schemes
The clique successfully carried out a scheme to combine the resources of the Central Intelligence Agency, the Israeli Mossad, and the British Secret Intelligence Service to become a global terror organization to facilitate the clique’s schemes in accordance with its age-old playbook, which calls for massive bribery, blackmail, deadly violence, and assassination. The latest creation of the clique’s three-headed Global Terrorist Organization is the fraudulent Islamic State of Iraq and ash-Sham (ISIS aka ISIL), which is a mercenary army that plays the role of a new global “boogie man” to replace the stale boogie-man, Al-Qaeda. The principal purpose of ISIS is to force regime change in Syria and to cause maximum fear and confusion throughout the Middle East to facilitate clique schemes.
19. Manipulating the Global Financial System To Engineer an Acceleration of the “Controlled Disintegration” of America, the European Union, and Many Other Nation-States Through Extreme Dept Dependency
In a long, concealed scheme, the clique has, since the 1980s, greatly accelerated its “controlled disintegration” of those nation-state economies and to sabotage the economies of resistant nation-states such as China, Russia, and others of the BRICS, Bolivarian Alliance of the Americas, the Union of South American Nations, and the Shanghai Cooperative Organization, all for the purpose of maximizing its extraordinary profits by (i) massive looting of world populations with its transnational corporations, (ii) fomenting war for lending and arms profits, (iii) managing its global narcotics trade and (iv) managing its fraudulent, and now insolvent, global banking monopoly.
Specifically, in America, the clique precipitated the insolvency of the American banking system and then used its private bank, the Federal Reserve, to issue massive volumes of U.S. taxpayer money and credit in the initial amount of $16.3 trillion to resuscitate its global banking system and its transnational corporations. And the clique continues to destroy the purchasing power of America’s dollar currency by having its Federal Reserve create and issue massive new quantities of un-backed dollars to its insolvent global banking system in a fraudulent practice referred to as “quantitative easing.”
20. Gutting of the American Economy and Causing the Destruction of the American Middle Class
Since the 1980s, the clique has undertaken a long, concealed scheme to de-industrialize America by having its transnational corporations absorb its manufacturing sector and move it to lower-cost labor markets.
And it has used its Tavistock psychological warfare apparatus to mislead the American public on the fictitious benefits of “globalization” and of a “post-industrial information economy,” while, in the meantime, building a rising concentration of transnational corporations under clique control that create huge new monopolies, fix artificially high prices, avoid taxation and tariffs, escape regulation, and drive millions of domestic businesses in America and across the globe into insolvency.
21. Reshaping America and Other Nation-States To Reverse Authentic Capitalism and Democracy
The concealed clique uses its heavily privileged transnational corporations to reverse authentic capitalism, create extreme income inequality, severely limit the rights and freedoms of individuals, and make a mockery of the American Dream. The clique also has gained further control of America’s nomination and electoral processes and those of other nation-states. The clique’s transnational corporations destroy nation-state economies, their political institutions and the welfare and morale of their populations.
22. Enlisting Clique Minions Based On Profiling That Detects Personal Psychological Damage and Vulnerability
The clique enlists minions to infiltrate all key American institutions based on a profiling process that selects candidates who display significant personal psychological damage and vulnerability. This scheme places these profiled and groomed individuals in positions of increasing power and influence, thereby denying the availability of such positions to far more qualified Americans who would resist the participating in the controlled disintegration of America and its economy.
In America, this practice can be traced to the clique’s American junior partner of very wealthy families of the Eastern Establishment who funded the preparatory schools and Ivy League universities, thereby embedding large numbers of disturbed, incompetent and treasonous minions on fast tracks to high positions of the American government, key American institutions, transnational corporations, and fraudulent “global governance” institutions such as the World Bank, the IMF, the World Trade Organization, the World Health Organization, the Bank of International Settlements, and the numerous other “world” organizations created without public consent or public legitimacy. Two of the most obvious examples of disastrous fast-tracking of privileged youth are Yale and Skull and Bones numbskulls are George W. Bush and John F. Kerry, whose performances as President and U.S. Secretary of State, respectively, have revealed their gross incompetence.
To maintain control of its minions, the clique will routinely lure them into compromising situations, document their transgressions, and, thereby, establish a basis for future blackmail threats, if necessary.
23. Assassinations and Attempted Assassinations of American Presidents and other American Leaders
The clique has been responsible for the assassinations of President Garfield, President McKinley, President Abraham Lincoln, President John F. Kennedy, Senator Paul D. Wellstone, Congressman Louis McFadden, Congressman Leo Ryan, presidential candidate and U.S. Senator Robert F. Kennedy, and civil rights leader, Reverend Martin Luther King, among others. The clique has been responsible for the attempted assassinations of President Andrew Jackson, President Ronald Reagan, and Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords.
24. Carrying Out Depopulation and Mass Physical and Mental Impairment of Americans and Other Populations
The clique is engaged in a poorly concealed scheme of depopulation and weakening of the mental and physical condition of global populations, including the American people.
These crimes of genocide and mass impairment of the human species take the form of: (i) massive global aerial spraying of toxic barium, strontium, and aluminum nano-particles by jet tankers; (ii) infiltration of the American and global medical research and treatment systems to limit scientific discovery of new medical treatments, including cancer therapy; (iii) concealed creation and dissemination of laboratory-developed infected vaccines; (iv) laboratory-developed germ warfare diseases such as AIDS and Ebola; (v) toxic fluoride in drinking water that has now been proven by Harvard Medical School studies to harm brain development in children; (vi) toxic additives to food supplies and food containers, (vii) the toxic effect of genetically modified crops on health and the environment; and (viii) a new vaccine discovered to contain a toxin that blocks the natural immune system defense to cancer. All members of the medical research team working on this discovery were murdered. Click on link: http://wp.me/p6GDMS-h
25. Carrying Out the Concealed Scheme of 9/11 To Create a New Bogeyman (Faked Worldwide Terrorism) and Simultaneously Conduct a Massive “Divide and Conquer” Deception to Stigmatize the Muslim World and Set Western Nation-States and Their Populations Against It
The clique had a combined benefit of (i) fomenting a new string of highly profitable wars in the Middle East; (ii) substantially weakening selected Muslim countries which were becoming a rising economic power and were moving away from the clique’s global banking system, which employed usury, a practice that Mohammed deplored; (iii) speeding up the “controlled disintegration” of America, the European Union, and other nation-states by instituting the “protection racket” of offering bogus security for those populations in exchange for surrender of personal rights and liberties that were designed to hasten their loss of national sovereignty and their arrival at the gates of the clique’s New World Order fantasy.
26. Carrying Out the Concealed Scheme To Destroy the Fukushima Nuclear Plant in Japan by Exploding Nuclear Devices Inside the Facility and Offshore To Create a Powerful Tsunami
On March 11, 2011, good evidence suggests that the clique exploded a nuclear device offshore the Fukushima Nuclear Plant to create a powerful tsunami for the purpose of destroying the plant and causing an enormous release of radioactive material into the atmosphere and into the Pacific Ocean that is now spreading worldwide. The clique, which is besieged by multiple forces dedicated to its eradication, created this unimaginably destructive terror weapon to force Japan and other nation-states to surrender their largest caches of financial assets, particularly gold and silver. The clique’s psychological warfare operation has successfully prevented the world’s population from knowing the high worldwide danger posed by this radioactive release. The existence of the clique and now the existence of the spreading radiation from Japan have been heavily concealed from the global public by the clique’s international “mainstream media” aka its psychological warfare weapon.
27. Using HAARP Technology to Create Weather Weapons
The clique is creating massive weather disturbances, powerful earthquakes, severe draught (i.e. in California), and deadly tsunamis by the use of HAARP technology. In October of 2012, Hurricane Sandy began forming in the Atlantic Ocean and was artificially magnified in force and steered toward the New York/New Jersey metropolitan areas and struck land on October 28. The weather weapon was used as a distraction to depress local voting during November 6, 2012 Presidential Elections. This artificially strengthened weather event became the largest hurricane on record and was conveniently and fraudulently blamed on global warming.
28. Carrying On an Intense and Prolonged Psychological Warfare Operation To Convince Global Populations of the Existence of Global Warming To Prepare Them for the Introduction of Carbon Taxes Which Are Designed To Fund the One World Government
This is a fraudulent global public relations scheme with potential for a new massive source of clique profit-taking and a further economic blow to the 99.9 percent of the world’s populations. Much like the cooked statistics of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and other corrupted U.S. economic agencies that support the false narrative of the American economy in recovery, the science statistics supporting global warming are being revealed to be cooked.
29. Carrying On An Intense and Prolonged Psychological Warfare Operation That Includes a Long Series of the Fictitious “Lone-Gunman” Massacres To Try To Force Americans to Give Away Their Rights and Liberties
This is an old-fashioned protection racket like those of organized crime organizations throughout history. However, instead of extracting money from the public, the clique is attempting to cause Americans to surrender their of guns and accept the militarization of American law enforcement to insure their “safety” under increasing terror threats that are all engineered by the clique.
The modern version of this protection racket is now carried out by the clique’s Israeli Trojan Horse minions embedded in the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and some Israeli-trained American police departments.
30. Carrying Out Un-American and Un-Constitutional Surveillance by the Clique-Controlled National Security Agency
Part of the revelations that have surfaced is that NSA has been used for many years by the clique: (i) to eavesdrop on all worldwide communication as a means of population and information control, and (ii) to build a deep blackmail file directed at elected and appointed officials in government and private positions across the world to magnify its control (and to profile future clique minion candidates).
31. Orchestrating the Formation of a North American Union To Submerge America, Canada, and Mexico In a European Union-Like Association In Preparation For Being Absorbed Into The Clique’s One-World Government Fantasy
Since the year 2000, the clique has been using its psychological warfare operations to bring about the conditions under which the peoples of America, Canada, and Mexico would accept the loss of their national sovereignty in exchange for membership in a North American Union (NAU), the precursor to fitting the NAU into the clique’s New World Government fantasy.
32. Orchestrating the Crushing Debt-Dependency of America, the European Union, and Other Nation-States To Force the Pace of Disintegration By Way of Fraudulently-Termed “Austerity” Schemes
Austerity is the term for pushing a society nearly to the bottom of its social and economic disintegration, to include (i) scaling back wages and salaries, (ii) scaling back social services, pensions, health benefits, and (iii) privatizing national assets such as airports, seaports, highways, and other public infrastructure. Austerity is simply another tool to bring about the collapse of national sovereignty.
33. Controlling and Blocking Scientific Discovery and Innovation To Prevent Social and Economic Improvement, Including Medical Advances
The concealed clique controls global medical science and innovation and is blocking cures and treatments of diseases such as cancer: (i) to protect its monopoly of pharmaceutical treatments and substances, and (ii) to protect the profit-taking from current medical protocols, equipment, and treatments. The clique also controls and blocks other scientific discovery and innovation to bring social and economic improvement to a halt and reverse the natural evolutionary advance of humankind and return the 99.9% of the global population to a state of feudal serfdom.
34. Withholding All Information About Extraterrestrial Matters To Create a Monopoly on Advanced Anti-Gravitational Technology, Space Travel, the Science of Cosmology, and Relations With the Various ET Species Commonly Described By Members of The Discovery Project
There is now sufficient evidence that the clique is maintaining a blanket of secrecy that pertains to all extraterrestrial matters. There is a multitude of uncorrupted scientists who have banded together to form The Discovery Project under the leadership of Dr. Steven M. Greer. Its website states:
“The Disclosure Project is a research project working to fully disclose the facts about UFOs, extraterrestrial intelligence, and classified advanced energy and propulsion systems.”
“We have over 500 government, military, and intelligence community witnesses testifying to their direct, personal, first hand experience with UFOs, ETs, ET technology, and the cover-up that keeps this information secret.”
Furthermore, there is work being done by Richard Dolan that goes one stop further. He spoke of something he called a “breakaway civilization” or a secret group (clique-controlled) with technological knowledge light years beyond the everyday world. He is quoted as saying:
“The basic idea of the ‘breakaway civilization’ is simply that you have a secret group, a classified group of people, with access to radically advanced technology, radically advanced science, and they just don’t share it with the rest of the world.”
“One scientific breakthrough leads to another, and that leads to another and so on. So the next thing you know, you’ve got a separate group of humanity that is vastly far beyond the rest of the world.”
To grasp the significance of this last and deeply concealed clique machination, please use the links below:
Dr. Steven M. Greer’s website is: http://www.disclosureproject.org/ Dr.Richard Dolan’s website is: www.afterdisclosure.com
35. Subverting the 2016 Presidential Primaries and Election Process In Violation of The U.S. Constitution
The American public has awakened to the astounding level of criminality in the effort to subvert the 2016 Presidential Primaries and Election Process to insure that Hillary Clinton becomes the next President of the United States. This criminality includes,but is not limited to:
The Democratic National Committee (DNC), led by Debbie Wasserman Schultz, was caught successfully subverting the primary process to prevent Bernie Sanders, the Clinton opponent, from gaining the nomination, although there was a very strong following of Sanders supporters, which appeared to eclipsed the size and strength of the Clinton support.
The DNC was caught in organizing paid thugs to cause violence at Trump rallies and then conspired with the “mainstream media” to characterize the Trump followers as the source of the violence.
The “mainstream media” has clearly shown itself not to be the core of the American free press, but rather it is nothing more than a public relations and psychological warfare arm of the Clinton campaign and has launched countless false and damaging stories about Trump, which were coordinated with all the “mainstream media” outlets including ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNBC, The New York Times, The Washington Post, the Huffington Post, Time, and many other mainstream sources which are all controlled by six mega-corporations that have already destroyed the American free press and its Constitutional mandate to inform the American public fairly and accurately. This abomination has come to the attention of the American people and confirms that the false and deceptive narratives of the “mainstream media” are, in fact, an effort to subvert the primary and election process that violates the U.S. Constitution.
The DNC and the Clinton campaign were caught employing at least two organizations to carry on a nationwide rigging of the Presidential election, a clear example of subverting the election and violating the U.S. Constitution.
The DNC and the Clinton campaign, conspiring with the “mainstream media,” carried out a deception to prevent the American people from knowing that Hillary Clinton is not qualified to run as President because of severe health conditions including the probability that she has Parkinson’s Disease.
After becoming aware of the above-mentioned treasonous actions of the “mainstream media,” it became obvious to the public that allowing this untrustworthy and criminal gaggle to control the three debates between Trump and Clinton was going to lead to more subversion. The “mainstream media” moderators should have been removed immediately upon their display of transparent dishonesty.
Finally, the revelations that have cascaded down on the American people from the multitudes of e-mail leaks from Hillary Clinton, John Podesta, et al. are a godsend, in spite of all the criminal efforts of the “mainstream media” to lie to, deceive and distract the American public.
Accordingly, there will be a round-up of all clique members, their junior partners and their minions all across the world, starting with the criminal members of the “mainstream media,” and they will be brought to justice by way of criminal investigations and grand jury hearings with sentencing for those found to have subverted the 2016 Presidential Primaries and Election; violated the U.S. Constitution; committed crimes against humanity, war crimes, and other extraordinary global criminality. It is my hope that those found guilty will receive the awe-inspiring sentence described below:
PERMANENT DEPORTATION AND SOLITARY CONFINEMENT FOR LIFE
IN A FROZEN NETHERWORLD
Those found guilty and sentenced to deportation and solitary confinement for life will be delivered to various U.S. seaports to be incarcerated in 7 ft. x 12 ft. solitary confinement cells (SCCs) equipped with battery-powered utilities and MRE/water storage, to be loaded inside large steel storage containers for transport by seagoing container ships.
Destination: the north Arctic Ocean.
To be delivered to a distribution hub in the New Siberian Islands, above the Arctic Circle (upper right at 80 degrees N).
Where the SCCs will Be reload into smaller steel storage containers and placed aboard shallow-draft ships to be off-loaded on barren and quarantined ice islands in the north Arctic Ocean.
Then, tractor-towed to permanent and widely dispersed SCC pads.
There, the Solitary Confinement Cells will be positioned on their individual, widely separated pads and plugged into their support storage units containing battery-powered utilities, MRE and water dispensers, and surveillance equipment.
And periodically resupplied by tractor-towed storage containers of fresh batteries, additional MREs (meals-ready-to-eat), water, spare parts, and sundries.
The interior of a 7 ft. x 12 ft. Solitary Confinement Cell
American National Service
File-Sharing Download links to two e-books: http://spaces.hightail.com/space/elrhN
Restoring The Peace (2016)
A Grandfather’s Encouragement To Our Next Generation (2013)